ABSTRACT
A novel telescopic access sheath technique has been described to maintain access to the ureter in cases of stent encrustation, placing a suture on the externalised distal end of the stent followed by advancing a sheath over to peel off encrustations and maintain access in the ureter, as well as application of this technique in a child. Herein we present a modification of the telescopic sheath technique that allows exchange of luminally encrusted stents without requiring passage of the sheath into the ureter or ureteroscopy alongside the stent.
Subject(s)
Lithotripsy , Ureter , Child , Humans , Ureter/surgery , Lithotripsy/methods , Ureteroscopy/methods , Stents , Sutures , Device Removal/methodsABSTRACT
Ureteral stents are commonly externalised retrogradely by cystoscopy and exchanged under imaging guidance. When a ureteral stent has migrated proximally into the ureter, it may be snared by ureteroscopy or antegrade percutaneous access; however, ureteroscopy can be challenging in young infants where there is difficulty visualizing the ureteral orifice or a small-calibre ureter. The presented case describes a radiologic technique for retrieval of a proximally migrated ureteral stent in a young infant using a 0.025-in. hydrophilic wire, 4-Fr angiographic catheter, 8-Fr vascular sheath and cystoscopic forceps, without requiring transrenal antegrade access or surgical ureteral meatotomy.
Subject(s)
Ureter , Infant , Humans , Ureter/diagnostic imaging , Ureter/surgery , Urinary Bladder , Stents , Surgical InstrumentsABSTRACT
AIM: Studies report that most boys with undescended testis(UDT) are referred and operated beyond the recommended age of 1 year, possibly due to lack of awareness of treatment guidelines. We investigate the level of knowledge of UDT among potential referring health-care providers. METHOD: We devised a survey on the clinical features and appropriate management of UDT. Using convenience sampling, we approached health-care professionals with regular contact with paediatric patients and final year medical students. Respondents were allowed to remain anonymous. They were categorised according to specialty and level of experience/training. RESULTS: Of 1179 approached, 203 responded. Thirty-six (24%) of 149 qualified doctors had never seen a case of UDT. Median score was 6 (range 1-9). There was no significant difference in scores when comparing specialty. Mean scores decreased significantly in trend according to level of experience. When questioned regarding timings of referral and orchidopexy, 24% of qualified doctors would not refer until 9 months of age, and 66% thought orchidopexy should be done after 1 year old. Half would stop examining for UDT after 2 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Inexperience with UDT and outdated knowledge may contribute to delays in referral for UDT. Many would stop examining for UDT at 2 years old, placing undue reliance on accurate physical examination in early childhood and indicating lack of awareness of the ascending testis. Community health initiatives must emphasise recent changes in guidelines for management of UDT.
Subject(s)
Cryptorchidism/diagnosis , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/education , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Cryptorchidism/surgery , Humans , Infant , Male , Orchiopexy , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Testis/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Undescended testis (UDT) affects 1-6% of males. Current recommendations are to correct maldescent by 1 year of age. We identify the population characteristics of children referred and managed for UDT, age at referral and orchidopexy, and patterns of referral. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Retrospective 5-year review of all patients operated for UDT from 2007 to 2011 in our institution. Patient demographics, neonatal diagnosis of UDT, age at referral, referral source and age at first orchidopexy were recorded. Data are reported as median (range). RESULTS: There were 513 boys with 576 undescended gonads; 450 (88%) had unilateral UDT. Congenital (present at birth) UDT was diagnosed in 287 (56%) children. Seventy-nine (15%) were premature births, 41 (8%) had associated major genitourinary abnormalities. Median age at referral was 1.1 (0-16.2) years; median age at first orchidopexy was 1.6 (0-17.2) years. When corrected for age, those with a history of prematurity and associated major genitourinary malformations were referred and operated on earlier. There was no difference in age at referral and orchidopexy when comparing unilateral versus bilateral maldescent, and palpability of UDT. Of those with congenital UDT, 70% were operated at beyond 1 year of age. Those referred from public tertiary hospitals were younger than those referred from community clinics (p<0.0001) and private healthcare institutions (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Despite early diagnosis in many patients with UDT, most are referred and operated after 1 year of age, even in congenital UDT. Premature babies, those with major genitourinary anomalies, and those seen in public tertiary hospitals are referred earlier. Community health initiatives must emphasise prompt referral to allay the impact of delayed surgery.
Subject(s)
Cryptorchidism/epidemiology , Orchiopexy/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Testis/surgery , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Cryptorchidism/surgery , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We evaluated the incidence of congenital anomalies associated with anorectal malformations (ARMs) in relation to the anatomic type of ARM as defined by the Krickenbeck classification. METHODS: We reviewed 99 children with ARM in our institution from 2002 to 2011. Data were collected on patient demographics, type of ARM, and associated congenital anomalies, which were categorized according to organ systems. Statistical analysis was performed for comparison between groups using 'perineal fistula' as the base group. RESULTS: There were 62 (63%) male patients. The majority had perineal fistulas (35, 35%). Seventy-seven (78%) had at least one associated malformation. The most frequent malformations seen were genitourinary (28, 28%) and spinal anomalies (26, 26%). Those with rectovesical fistula had the highest proportion of genitourinary malformations (Odds Ratio [OR], 41.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-363.4). Those with cloaca (OR, 49.5; 95% CI, 3.4-718.9) and those with rectovestibular fistula (OR, 12.4; 95% CI, 2.3-65.6) were most likely to have major spinal abnormalities, with tethered cord seen in all groups. The rectovestibular group was also most likely to have other associated malformations (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 2.2-32.8). CONCLUSION: More than 75% of children with anorectal malformation have other associated malformations. Genitourinary anomalies are the most common. Major spinal anomalies are seen in all groups, affecting nearly half of those with rectovestibular fistula and those without fistula. The incidence of associated malformations in the rectovestibular group is higher than described in the literature. Thorough systematic evaluation of all infants with ARM should be done regardless of type of ARM.