Biologics Targeting in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Conundrum.

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic, gastrointestinal disorder which is classified into Crohns' disease and ulcerative colitis. It has a strong effect on the quality of life and is characterized by chronic periods of exacerbation and remission. It has an unknown etiology but is driven due to excessive immune response in the gut wall. The triggered immune response causes overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules. Biological therapies are the monoclonal antibodies that are created in the laboratory to stop certain proteins in the body causing inflammation. These biologics have dramatically changed the therapeutic approach to inflammatory bowel disease. Biologics has three classes: anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-integrins, and anti-interleukin (IL) 12/23. This article offers a critical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of biological agents in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. We compared different studies that were available in the PubMed database. All the biologics showed a better clinical response and mucosal healing than placebo. Infliximab has the highest efficacy, but it can make antibodies to infliximab that causes loss of response; then golimumab is effective in these patients. Certolizumab is more effective if it is used as a first-line drug. If corticosteroid and immunomodulator therapy has failed then vedolizumab is effective. As steroid therapy causes major adverse effects and involves the whole body, biological therapy should take over. Still, we need more studies to make biological therapy as a first option in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Is There a Correlation Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Lactose Intolerance?

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a poorly understood gastrointestinal disorder that affects a significant percentage of the population and has a strong negative effect on the quality of life. The lack of known pathophysiologic mechanisms has made finding effective treatment strategies difficult. One of the common recommendations by clinicians is a trial of a lactose-free diet. We have wondered if there was sufficient evidence in the currently available literature to support such a recommendation. We have also looked into other possible relationships between malabsorption syndromes and IBS. All the articles used for this review have been found in the PubMed database. We have taken into consideration the possibility that there may be both genetic differences and differences in the gut microbiome between populations living in different geographic regions. Therefore, we have included articles from different geographic regions to increase the generalizability of the findings. While there is a plethora of evidence that IBS patients commonly report milk intolerance, we have not found any conclusive evidence to suggest an objective link between IBS and any known malabsorption syndromes, including lactose malabsorption. Furthermore, trials of lactase supplementation have not led to clinical benefit. We concluded that there was no evidence to support routinely recommending a lactose-free diet for patients diagnosed with IBS, but including hydrogen breath testing in routine workup of IBS is a reasonable clinical decision. Ultimately, we believe that more clinical trials and chemical studies of the feces are needed to determine the pathophysiology and explore possible dietary recommendations for patients with IBS.