Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0297568, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The newly developed COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective and safe. However, a small portion of vaccine recipients experience a wide range of adverse events. Recently, glomerular disease, including the development of Minimal Change Disease (MCD), has been observed after administration of different COVID-19 vaccines, although causality remains a matter of debate. AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to comprehensively examine the available literature and provide an overview of reported cases of MCD following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: We identified 46 eligible articles which included 94 cases with MCD following COVID-19 vaccination of which one case was reported twice due to a second relapse. Fifty-five participants were males (59.1%, 55/93) and 38 (40.9%, 38/93) were females with a mean age of 45.02 years (SD:20.95). From the included patients 50 (50/94, 53.1%) were described as new-onset and 44 (46.9%, 44/94) as relapse. On average, symptomatology developed 16.68 days (SD: 22.85) after the administration of the vaccine irrespective of the dose. Data about symptoms was reported in 68 cases with the most common being oedema (80.8%, 55/68), followed by weight gain (26.5%, 18/68) and hypertension (16.1%, 11/68). In terms of outcome, more than half of the patients went into remission (61%, 57/94), while 18 recovered or improved post treatment (19.1%, 18/94). Two people relapsed after treatment (2.1%, 2/94) and two cases (2.1%, 2/94) were reported as not recovered. CONCLUSION: MCD is possibly a condition clinicians may see in patients receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Although this adverse event is uncommon, considering the limited published data and the absence of confirmed causality, increased clinical awareness is crucial for the early recognition and optimal management of these patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Nephrosis, Lipoid , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Nephrosis, Lipoid/chemically induced , Recurrence , Vaccination/adverse effects
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 164(7): 1719-1746, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35230552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disease and dementia subtype involving disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) homeostasis. Patients with iNPH may improve clinically following CSF diversion through shunt surgery, but it remains a challenge to predict which patients respond to shunting. It has been proposed that CSF and blood biomarkers may be used to predict shunt response in iNPH. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify which CSF and venous biomarkers predict shunt-responsive iNPH most accurately. METHODS: Original studies that investigate the use of CSF and venous biomarkers to predict shunt response were searched using the following databases: Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and JSTOR. Included studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and eligible studies were evaluated utilising univariate meta-analyses. RESULTS: The study included 13 studies; seven addressed lumbar CSF levels of amyloid-ß 1-42, nine studies CSF levels of Total-Tau, six studies CSF levels of Phosphorylated-Tau, and seven studies miscellaneous biomarkers, proteomics, and genotyping. A meta-analysis of six eligible studies conducted for amyloid-ß 1-42, Total-Tau, and Phosphorylated-Tau demonstrated significantly increased lumbar CSF Phosphorylated-Tau (- 0.55 SMD, p = 0.04) and Total-Tau (- 0.50 SMD, p = 0.02) in shunt-non-responsive iNPH, though no differences were seen between shunt responders and non-responders for amyloid-ß 1-42 (- 0.26 SMD, p = 0.55) or the other included biomarkers. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found that lumbar CSF levels of Phosphorylated-Tau and Total-Tau are significantly increased in shunt non-responsive iNPH compared to shunt-responsive iNPH. The other biomarkers, including amyloid-ß 1-42, did not significantly differentiate shunt-responsive from shunt-non-responsive iNPH. More studies on the Tau proteins examining sensitivity and specificity at different cut-off levels are needed for a robust analysis of the diagnostic efficiency of the Tau proteins.


Subject(s)
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , Humans , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/cerebrospinal fluid , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/diagnosis , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/surgery , tau Proteins/cerebrospinal fluid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...