Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Surg Educ ; 79(4): 957-963, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341710

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Effective education of orthopedic residents requires an understanding of how they process information. To date however no literature has described resident learning styles based on the updated Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI) v4.0. The purpose of this study is to identify common learning styles amongst orthopedic residents and attendings and evaluate the effect that race, gender, and resident/attending status have on learning styles. DESIGN: The KLSI v4.0 and a demographic survey were distributed to 103 orthopedic attendings and residents at two academic centers during the 2019 to 2020 academic year. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were reported. Learning styles based on gender, race, attending versus resident status, and institution were evaluated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. SETTING: This is a multi-center study performed at two academic, university based orthopedic surgery departments. PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic surgery residents and attending surgeons. RESULTS: At both institutions, the combined response rate for the KLSI v4.0 was 66% and 68% for the demographic surgery. The three most common learning styles recorded were: Deciding (26.5%), Acting (17.6%), and Thinking (17.6%). Learning styles were compared by gender, race, attending and/or resident status, and institution with no statistically significant difference found between any of the comparisons (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The majority of orthopedic surgeons have Deciding, Acting, or Thinking learning styles, which are categorized by motivation to achieve goals, disciplined and logical reasoning, and the use of theories and models to solve problems. However, not all residents and attendings utilize these common learning styles. A mismatch in learning styles between residents and attendings could result in poor educational experiences. Understanding the learning styles of orthopedic surgeons has implications for improving evaluation interpretation, mentorship pairing, quality of life, and resident remediation.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Orthopedics , Surgeons , Clinical Competence , Humans , Orthopedics/education , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
JAMA Surg ; 156(5): e207259, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33760010

ABSTRACT

Importance: Despite the widespread use of systemic antibiotics to prevent infections in surgically treated patients with fracture, high rates of surgical site infection persist. Objective: To examine the effect of intrawound vancomycin powder in reducing deep surgical site infections. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial enrolled adult patients with an operatively treated tibial plateau or pilon fracture who met the criteria for a high risk of infection from January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2017, with 12 months of follow-up (final follow-up assessments completed in April 2018) at 36 US trauma centers. Interventions: A standard infection prevention protocol with (n = 481) or without (n = 499) 1000 mg of intrawound vancomycin powder. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a deep surgical site infection within 182 days of definitive fracture fixation. A post hoc comparison assessed the treatment effect on gram-positive and gram-negative-only infections. Other secondary outcomes included superficial surgical site infection, nonunion, and wound dehiscence. Results: The analysis included 980 patients (mean [SD] age, 45.7 [13.7] years; 617 [63.0%] male) with 91% of the expected person-time of follow-up for the primary outcome. Within 182 days, deep surgical site infection was observed in 29 of 481 patients in the treatment group and 46 of 499 patients in the control group. The time-to-event estimated probability of deep infection by 182 days was 6.4% in the treatment group and 9.8% in the control group (risk difference, -3.4%; 95% CI, -6.9% to 0.1%; P = .06). A post hoc analysis of the effect of treatment on gram-positive (risk difference, -3.7%; 95% CI, -6.7% to -0.8%; P = .02) and gram-negative-only (risk difference, 0.3%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 2.1%; P = .78) infections found that the effect of vancomycin powder was a result of its reduction in gram-positive infections. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with operatively treated tibial articular fractures at a high risk of infection, intrawound vancomycin powder at the time of definitive fracture fixation reduced the risk of a gram-positive deep surgical site infection, consistent with the activity of vancomycin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02227446.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fractures, Ununited/etiology , Humans , Intra-Articular Fractures/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Powders , Probability , Prospective Studies , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Time Factors , Vancomycin/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...