Analytical sensitivity of the Rapid Antigen Test kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant BA.2 sublineage.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron was classified as a variant of concern in November 2021. The sublineage BA.2 spreads rapidly worldwide. Currently, there is a lack of data for the parallel comparison of Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) Kits to detect SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2. We evaluated the analytical sensitivity of 12 RAT kits to detect Omicron BA.2 in the present study. Analytical sensitivity was determined by means of the limit of detection (LOD). We prepared a dilution set using a respiratory specimen collected from a COVID-19 patient infected by Omicron BA.2. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used as a reference method. The LOD results showed that all 12 RAT kits had comparable analytical sensitivity to detect Omicron BA.2. The RAT kits selected in the current study may be used for the first-line screening of the rapid spreading Omicron BA.2.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 VOC-Omicron using commercial sample-to-answer real-time RT-PCR platforms and melting curve-based SNP assays.

Objectives: The World Health Organization (WHO) had designated the SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.529 as the new Variant of Concern Omicron (VOC-Omicron) on 26th November 20211. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) tests were widely employed to detect SARS-CoV-2 and its variant. Yet, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection performance of commercial real-time RT-PCR platforms and SARS-CoV-2 spike SNP assays remain to be elucidated. Methods: In the first part of this study, we evaluated the VOC-Omicron detection performance of three commercial RT-PCR sample-to-answer platforms i.e. Roche cobas® 6800/8800, Roche cobas® Liat®, and Cepheid GeneXpert® systems. The detection performances were compared to one commercial conventional real-time RT-PCR assay (TIB MOLBIOL LightMix Modular SARS and Wuhan CoV E-gene) and one in-house real-time RT-PCR assay targeting RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) gene of SARS-CoV-2 in the WHO COVID-19 Reference Laboratory at Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. In the second part of this study, we evaluated the SNP detection performance of four TIB MOLBIOL melting curve-based assays (1. Spike S371L/S373P, 2. Spike E484A, 3. Spike E484K and 4. Spike N501Y) in clinical samples obtained from hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong. The SNP results were compared to whole genome sequences generated by Illumina platform. Results: The VOC-Omicron detection limits of three commercial sample-to-answer assays were tested to be ≤ 2.35 Log10 dC/ml. The detection performances of the sample-to-answer platforms were comparable to the two tested conventional real-time RT-PCR assays. The test sensitivities of TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike S371L/S373P assay and the Spike E484A assays were 100% and 96.6% respectively and the test specificities of both assays were 100%. An aberrant melting peak at Tm 42-44°C was observed when the specimens with Omicron variant were tested with the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484K assay. Notably, the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike N501Y assay failed to detect the spike N501Y mutation of Omicron variant in the tested specimens. Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 detection sensitivity of three commercial platforms, Roche cobas® 6800/8800, Roche cobas® Liat®, and Cepheid GeneXpert® systems were shown not to be impacted by the large number of mutations of VOC-Omicron. Also, the signature mutations i.e. Spike S371L/Spike S373P and Spike E484A in VOC-Omicron were correctly identified by the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike S371L/S373P and VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484A assays. Unexpected findings including a shifted melting peak or absence of amplification curve/melting peak were observed when specimens with Omicron variant were tested with the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484K assay and Spike N501Y assay, suggesting a potential alert for Omicron variant, prior confirmation by whole genome sequencing.

Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 virus.

Aim: Currently, there is lack of data regarding rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits to detect SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 virus. Objective: The purpose of this evaluation is to assess analytical sensitivity of 12 RAD kits against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2. Study design: Analytical sensitivity was determined by limit of detection (LOD). A serial tenfold dilution set from a respiratory specimen collected from a COVID-19 patient infected by SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 was used. RT-PCR was used as a reference method. Results: The LOD results showed that 11 and one RAD kits were 100- and 1000-fold less sensitive than RT-PCR respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that the RAD kits evaluated in this study may be used for first-line screening of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 variant.

Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in combined nasal-and-throat swabs collected from COVID-19 individuals under the Universal Community Testing Programme in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Combined nasal-and-throat swabs (CNTS) is less invasive and easy to execute. CNTS also induces lower risk to healthcare workers upon collection. However, there is a lack of data on viral load assessment for population-wide testing. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed if CNTS is suitable as an alternative specimen type for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We assessed the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in CNTS collected from COVID-19 individuals through the 2-week period of the Universal Community Testing Programme (UCTP) conducted in Hong Kong. In addition, we compared viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 for the paired CNTS and non-CNTS specimens among these individuals. RESULTS: This UCTP identified 48 COVID-19 individuals from nearly 2 million specimens collected. The viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 varied widely, cycle threshold values Ct 16.28-36.94, among symptoms and asymptomatic individuals. The viral loads for the paired CNTS and non-CNTS specimens were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CNTS could be a specimen of choice for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.

Evaluation of automated antigen detection test for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

RT-PCR is the gold standard to detect SARS-CoV-2, however, its capacity is limited. We evaluated an automated antigen detection (AAD) test, Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Roche, Germany), for detecting SARS-CoV-2. We compared the limit of detection (LOD) between AAD test, rapid antigen detection (RAD) test; SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (SD Biosensor, Korea), and in-house RT-PCR test. LOD results showed that the AAD test was 100 fold more sensitive than the RAD test, while the sensitivity of the AAD test was comparable to the RT-PCR test. The AAD test detected between 85.7% and 88.6% of RT-PCR-positive specimens collected from COVID-19 patients, false negative results were observed for specimens with Ct values >30. Although clinical sensitivity for the AAD test was not superior or comparable to the RT-PCR test in the present study, the AAD test may be an alternative to RT-PCR test in terms of turn-around time and throughput.

The surveillance of spike protein for patients with COVID-19 detected in Hong Kong in 2020.

In 2020, numerous fast-spreading severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have been reported. These variants had unusually high genetic changes in the spike (S) protein. In an attempt to understand the genetic background of SARS-CoV-2 viruses in Hong Kong, especially before vaccination, the purpose of this study is to summarize the S protein mutations detected among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Hong Kong in 2020. COVID-19 cases were selected every month in 2020. One virus from each case was analyzed. The full encoding region of the S proteins was sequenced. From January 2020 to December 2020, a total of 340 COVID-19 viruses were sequenced. The amino acids of the S protein for 44 (12.9%) were identical to the reference sequence, WIV04 (GenBank accession MN996528). For the remaining 296 sequences (87.1%), a total of 43 nonsynonymous substitution patterns were found. Of the nonsynonymous substitutions found, some of them were only detected at specific time intervals and then they disappeared. The ongoing genetic surveillance system is important. It would facilitate early detection of mutations that can increase infectivity as well as mutations that are selected for the virus to escape immunological restraint.

Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kit from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are two rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: The Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device was selected to evaluate the performance for detecting SARS-CoV-2. STUDY DESIGN: Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined by limit of detection (LOD) using RT-PCR as a reference method. Clinical sensitivity was evaluated by using respiratory specimens collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The LOD results showed that the RAD kit was 100 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. Clinical sensitivity of the RAD kit was 68.6 % for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The RAD kit evaluated in the present study shared similar performance with another kit from the WHO Emergency Use List, the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag. Understanding the clinical characteristics of RAD kits can guide us to decide different testing strategies in different settings.

Early detection of community acquired of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.351 in Hong Kong.

Background: Prior to this report, variants of concern for SARS-CoV-2 were only detected from imported cases in Hong Kong. Objective: Multiple cases of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.351 have been identified in local community. We reported the phylogenetic relationship of these cases. Study design: SARS-CoV-2 cases were screened for the key non-synonymous substitutions in spike protein by different assays. Preliminary positive cases were further tested by whole genome sequencing. Results: From Dec 2020 to May 2021, 55 SARS-CoV-2 cases belonged to lineage B.1.351. Among them, eight genomes were clustered together, all of them were local cases with epidemiological link. Conclusions: To track variants of SARS-CoV-2 and to allow early implementation of control measures, SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance must be consistently performed.

Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.

BACKGROUND: Numerous rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits for diagnosing COVID-19 patients are available in the market recently. OBJECTIVE: To compare analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity for the three commercially available RAD kits. STUDY DESIGN: Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined by limit of detection (LOD) using RT-PCR as a reference method. Clinical sensitivity was evaluated by using respiratory specimens collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The LOD results showed that the three RAD kits varied from 102-105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. Clinical sensitivity of RAD kits ranged from 22.9 %-71.4 % for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although RAD kits were less sensitive than RT-PCR, understanding the clinical characteristics of different RAD kits can guide us to obtain suitable specimens for testing. The likelihood of positive results for RAD kits will be higher.

Infection Risks Faced by Public Health Laboratory Services Teams When Handling Specimens Associated With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Infection risks of handling specimens associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by public health laboratory services teams were assessed to scrutinize the potential hazards arising from the work procedures. Through risk assessments of all work sequences, laboratory equipment, and workplace environments, no aerosol-generating procedures could be identified except the procedures (mixing and transfer steps) inside biological safety cabinets. Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) such as surgical masks, protective gowns, face shields/safety goggles, and disposable gloves, together with pertinent safety training, was provided for laboratory work. Proper disinfection and good hand hygiene practices could minimize the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection at work. All residual risk levels of the potential hazards identified were within the acceptable level. Contamination by gloved hands was considered as a major exposure route for SARS-CoV-2 when compared with eye protection equipment. Competence in proper donning and doffing of PPE accompanied by hand washing techniques was of utmost importance for infection control.

Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.

BACKGROUND: The rapid diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is essential to reduce the disease spread. Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are available, however, there is scanty data on the performance of RAD tests. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the commercially available BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag test and compare it with RT-PCR for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined for the RAD test using viral culture and RT-PCR as reference methods. The RAD test was further evaluated using respiratory samples collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. The results were compared with RT-PCR test. RESULTS: The detection limits between RAD test, viral culture and RT-PCR varied hugely. RAD was 103 fold less sensitive than viral culture while RAD was 105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. The RAD test detected between 11.1 % and 45.7 % of RT-PCR-positive samples from COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the RAD test serves only as adjunct to RT-PCR test because of potential for false-negative results.

Use of cerebrospinal fluid enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of neurosyphilis.

Neurosyphilis is a difficult clinical stage of syphilis as there is no ideal method for diagnosis and workup requires lumbar puncture which may sometimes provide ambiguous results especially in HIV co-infected patients. Enzyme immunoassay is a widely used screening test for syphilis in serum, but its test performance was not well studied in cerebrospinal fluid. To examine the diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid-enzyme immunoassay (CSF-EIA) in neurosyphilis, we conducted a prospective study for two years. All consecutive patients admitted for workup of neurosyphilis under the Social Hygiene Service, in Hong Kong, were included. Laboratory tests on CSF included several serological tests, CSF cell count, and protein. Forty-five patients were prospectively recruited, of which 29 people were living with HIV / AIDS. Using diagnostic case definition standard stipulated in the IUSTI 2008 guidelines, 17 patients satisfied the diagnosis of neurosyphilis. The CSF-EIA test provided 100% in both sensitivity and negative predictive value; its specificity was 46.4% (13/28, 95% CI 31.8-61%). Specificity improved to 80.8% (95% CI: 68.4-93.2%) with optical density cut-off value at 1.4 for cases with CSF red cell counts <600/mm(3) This is the first study on use of CSF-EIA in neurosyphilis. CSF-EIA showed high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the study population and the presence of CSF red cells < 600/mm(3)might not affect its accuracy.

Failure to confirm HIV infection in two end-stage HIV/AIDS patients using a popular commercial line immunoassay.

Immunoassays using either viral lysate (Western blot) or recombinant/synthetic antigen (immunoblot) for anti-HIV capture are still the preferred method to confirm HIV infection. Two cases of HIV-1-infected patients presented with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining illnesses. Laboratory tests were performed using multiple commercial HIV test kits on multiple sera from both patients over several weeks. Both patients were strongly positive on the anti-HIV/p24 antigen combined screening assay. Yet, HIV-1 infection could not be confirmed using a popular commercial immunoassay. Eventually, HIV infection was confirmed using an alternative commercial Western blot assay as well as an HIV quantitative PCR test. In laboratories without nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HIV, indeterminate results may delay confirmation of HIV infection, if commercial line immunoassays alone are available. Some end-stage HIV/AIDS patients may not produce antibodies to specific HIV antigens and may therefore give indeterminant or negative results on some immunoassays, depending on the type of antigen used. This report highlights the utility of having NAT available when diagnosing difficult cases of HIV infection, especially in light of the recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention move towards more universal, routine, HIV testing.