Predictors of later COVID-19 test seeking.

Background: Delays in COVID-19 testing may increase the risk of secondary household and community transmission. Little is known about what patient characteristics and symptom profiles are associated with delays in test seeking. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all symptomatic patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and assessed in a COVID Expansion to Outpatients (COVIDEO) virtual care program between March 2020 and June 2021. The primary outcome was later test seeking more than 3 days from symptom onset. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine predictors of later testing including patient characteristics and symptoms (30 individual symptoms or 7 symptom clusters). Results: Of 5,363 COVIDEO patients, 4,607 were eligible and 2,155/4,607 (46.8%) underwent later testing. Older age was associated with increased odds of late testing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.007/year; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01), as was history of recent travel (aOR 1.4; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.95). Health care workers had lower odds of late testing (aOR 0.50; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.62). Late testing was associated with symptoms in the cardiorespiratory (aOR 1.2; 95% CI 1.05, 1.36), gastrointestinal (aOR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.04, 1.4), neurological (aOR 1.1; 95% CI 1.003, 1.3) and psychiatric (aOR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1, 1.5) symptom clusters. Among individual symptoms, dyspnea, anosmia, dysgeusia, sputum, and anorexia were associated with late testing; pharyngitis, myalgia, and headache were associated with early testing. Conclusion: Certain patient characteristics and symptoms are associated with later testing, and warrant further efforts to encourage earlier testing to minimize transmission.

Historique: Les retards à effectuer les tests de dépistage de la COVID-19 peuvent accroître le risque de transmission secondaire dans la famille et la communauté. On ne sait pas vraiment quels sont les caractéristiques des patients et leurs profils de symptômes associés aux retards à se faire dépister. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont réalisé une étude de cohorte auprès de tous les patients symptomatiques ayant obtenu un diagnostic de COVID-19 évalués dans le cadre du programme de soins virtuels COVID Expansion to Outpatients (COVIDEO, ou expansion de la COVID aux patients ambulatoires) entre mars 2020 et juin 2021. Le résultat primaire était une demande de dépistage plus de trois jours après l'apparition des symptômes. Les chercheurs ont utilisé la régression logistique multivariable pour examiner les prédicteurs d'un dépistage tardif, y compris les caractéristiques et les symptômes des patients (30 symptômes individuels ou sept grappes de symptômes). Résultats: Des 5 363 patients ayant participé au programme COVIDEO, 4 607 étaient admissibles et 2 155 de ces 4 607 (46,8 %) se sont soumis à un dépistage tardif. Une plus grande probabilité de dépistage tardif était liée à un âge avancé (rapport de cotes corrigé [RCc] 1,007/année, IC à 95 %, 1,00 à 1,01), de même qu'à un voyage récent (RCc = 1,4, IC à 95 %, 1,01 à 1,95). Les travailleurs de la santé étaient moins susceptibles de se faire dépister tardivement (RCc = 0,50, IC à 95 %, 0,39 à 0,62). Le dépistage tardif était associé à des symptômes de la grappe cardiorespiratoire (RCc = 1,2, IC à 95 %, [1,05, 1,36]), gastrointestinale (RCc = 1,2, IC à 95 %, [1,04, 1,4]), neurologique (RCc = 1,1, IC à 95 %, [1,003, 1,3]) et psychiatrique (RCc = 1,3, IC à 95 %, [1,1, 1,5]). Parmi les symptômes individuels, la dyspnée, l'anosmie, la dysgueusie, les expectorations et l'anorexie étaient associées à un dépistage tardif, et la pharyngite, les myalgies et les céphalées, à un dépistage précoce. Conclusion: Certaines caractéristiques des patients et certains symptômes étaient associés à un dépistage tardif, ce qui justifie des efforts supplémentaires pour favoriser un dépistage plus rapide afin de limiter la transmission. Summary: This study of more than 4,000 patients with COVID-19 identified predictors of later test seeking, including older age, recent travel, non-health care worker occupation, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, neurologic and psychiatric symptom clusters, and dyspnea, anosmia, dysgeusia, sputum, and anorexia.

A sepsis treatment algorithm to improve early antibiotic de-escalation while maintaining adequacy of coverage (Early-IDEAS): A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Empiric antibiotic treatment selection should provide adequate coverage for potential pathogens while minimizing unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use. We sought to pilot a sepsis treatment algorithm to individualize antibiotic recommendations, and thereby improve early antibiotic de-escalation while maintaining adequacy of coverage (Early-IDEAS). METHODS: In this observational study, the Early-IDEAS decision support algorithm was derived from previous Gram- negative and Gram-positive prediction rules and models along with local guidelines, and then applied to prospectively identified consecutive adults within 24 hours of suspected sepsis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients for whom de-escalation of the primary antibiotic regimen was recommended by the algorithm. Secondary outcomes included: (1) proportion of patients for whom escalation was recommended; (2) number of recommended de-escalation steps along a pre-specified antibiotic cascade; and (3) adequacy of therapy in patients with culture-confirmed infection. RESULTS: We screened 578 patients, of whom 107 eligible patients were included. The Early-IDEAS treatment recommendation was informed by Gram-negative models in 76 (71%) patients, Gram-positive rules in 64 (59.8%), and local guidelines in 27 (25.2%). Antibiotic de-escalation was recommended in almost half of all patients (n = 52, 48.6%), with a median of 2 steps down the a priori antibiotic treatment cascade. No treatment change was recommended in 45 patients (42.1%), and escalation was recommended in 10 (9.3%). Among the 17 patients with positive blood cultures, both the clinician prescribed regimen and the algorithm recommendation provided adequate coverage for the isolated pathogen in 12 patients (70.6%), (p = 1). Among the 25 patients with positive relevant, non-blood cultures, both the clinician prescribed regimen and the algorithm recommendation provided adequate coverage in 20 (80%), (p = 1). CONCLUSION: An individualized decision support algorithm in early sepsis could lead to substantial antibiotic de-escalation without compromising adequate antibiotic coverage.

Patient predictors of pathogenic versus commensal Gram-positive bacilli organisms isolated from blood cultures.

Objective: Gram-positive bacilli represent a diverse species of bacteria that range from commensal flora to pathogens implicated in severe and life-threatening infection. Following the isolation of Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures, the time to species identification may take upward of 24 hours, leaving clinicians to conjecture whether they may represent a contaminant (inadvertent inoculation of commensal flora) or pathogenic organism. In this study, we sought to identify patient variables that could help predict the isolation of contaminant versus pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Settings: One quaternary academic medical center affiliated with the University of Toronto. Patients: Adult inpatients were admitted to hospital over a 5-year period (May 2014 to December 2019). Methods: A total of 260 unique Gram-positive bacilli blood culture results from adult inpatients were reviewed and analyzed in both a univariable and multivariable model. Results: Malignancy (aOR 2.78, 95% CI 1.33-5.91, p = 0.007), point increments in the Quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment score for sepsis (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.50-3.47, p < 0.001), peptic ulcer disease (aOR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43-21.0, p = 0.01), and the receipt of immunosuppression prior to a blood culture draw (aOR 3.80, 95% CI 1.86-8.01, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of speciating pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures such as Clostridium species and Listeria monocytogenes. Conclusion: Such predictors can help supplement a clinician's assessment on determining when empirical therapy is indicated when faced with Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures and may direct future stewardship interventions for responsible antimicrobial prescribing.

How standardised are antibiotic regimens in otologic surgery?

BACKGROUND: Within otologic surgery, a paucity of well-controlled studies assessing the use of systemic antibiotic to reduce surgical site infections exists. Moreover, discrepancies in wound classification of procedures challenge consensus in antimicrobial prescribing patterns. We sought to compare surgeons from two different health systems to examine how surgeons' prescribing habits compared to practice guidelines for numerous otologic procedures. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to 33 Canadian and 32 Austrian surgeons who regularly perform otologic surgery. Current systemic antibiotic prescribing habits for cochlear implantation, cholesteatoma surgery, stapes surgery, and tympanoplasty ± ossiculoplasty were collected. RESULTS: Eighteen of 33 (54.5%) Canadian surgeons provided responses, while 18 of 32 (56.3%) of Austrian surgeons answered. Clear consistency with clinical practice guidelines exists for pre-operative antibiotics use in cochlear implant surgery and infected cholesteatoma surgery. However, for stapes surgery and tympanoplasty ± ossiculoplasty, consensus is lacking for both pre- and post-operative antibiotic prescribing habits. Notable differences between the two countries include post-operative antibiotics for cochlear implant surgery (Austria: 36.4%, Canada: 71.4%) and uninfected cholesteatoma surgery (Austria: 33.3%, Canada: 77.8%). Across all procedures, both induction and post-operative antibiotic administration was not significantly associated with surgeon seniority when stratified by five-year increments. CONCLUSION: The lack of consensus among each country's otologic surgeons underscores the uncertainty in wound classification and thus, adherence to clinical practice guidelines.

Optimizing Cefazolin Prophylaxis in Obstetrical Patients with Reported Beta-Lactam Allergy Undergoing Cesarean Delivery.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the impact of an allergy history-guided algorithm for optimizing perioperative cefazolin use in patients with reported beta-lactam allergy undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: The Allergy Clarification for Cefazolin Evidence-based Prescribing Tool (ACCEPT) was developed through consensus by allergists, anesthesiologists, and infectious diseases specialists, and implemented over a 2-month period (December 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019). A segmented regression on monthly cefazolin use was conducted during the baseline (January 1 to November 30, 2018) and intervention (February 1 to December 31, 2019) periods to evaluate the impact of ACCEPT on the monthly use of perioperative cefazolin in patients with reported beta-lactam allergy undergoing cesarean delivery. The frequency of perioperative allergic reactions and surgical site infections was collected during both periods. RESULTS: Of the 3128 eligible women who underwent a cesarean delivery, 282 (9%) reported a beta-lactam allergy. The most common beta-lactam allergens were penicillin (64.3%), amoxicillin (16.0%), and cefaclor (6.0%). The most frequently reported allergic reactions were rash (38.1%), hives (21.4%), and unknown (11.6%). Use of cefazolin increased from 52% (baseline) to 87% during the intervention period. Segmented regression analysis confirmed a statistically significant increase following implementation (incidence rate ratio 1.62, 95% CI 1.19-2.21, P = 0.002). There was 1 perioperative allergic reaction in the baseline period and 2 during the intervention period. Cefazolin use remained high (92%) 2 years after algorithm implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a simple allergy history-guided algorithm in obstetrical patients with reported beta-lactam allergy resulted in a sustained increase in perioperative cefazolin prophylaxis.

Evaluating the impact of a virtual outpatient care programme in preventing hospitalizations, emergency department visits and mortality for patients with COVID-19: a matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of virtual care in preventing unnecessary healthcare visits for patients with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study, evaluating the COVID-19 Expansion to Outpatients (COVIDEO) programme involving virtual assessments for all positive patients in the Sunnybrook assessment centre from January 2020 to June 2021, followed by risk-stratified routine follow-up, couriering of oxygen saturation devices, and 24 hour/day direct-to-physician pager for urgent questions. We linked COVIDEO data to province-wide datasets, matching each eligible COVIDEO patient to ≤10 other Ontario SARS-CoV-2 patients on age, sex, neighbourhood, and date. The primary outcome was emergency department (ED) visit, hospitalization or death within 30 days. Multivariable regression accounted for comorbidities, vaccination, and pre-pandemic healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Among 6508 eligible COVIDEO patients, 4763 (73.1%) were matched to ≥1 non-COVIDEO patient. COVIDEO care was protective against the primary composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.91, 95% CI, 0.82-1.02), with a reduction in ED visits (7.8% vs. 9.6%; aOR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.70-0.89), but increase in hospitalizations (3.8% vs. 2.7%, aOR 1.37, 95% CI, 1.14-1.63) reflecting more direct-to-ward admissions (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.0001). Results were similar when matched comparators were limited to patients who had not received virtual care elsewhere with a decrease in ED visits (7.8 vs. 8.6%, aOR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.99) and an increase in hospitalizations (3.7 vs. 2.4%, aOR 1.45, 95% CI, 1.17-1.80). DISCUSSION: An intensive remote care programme can prevent unnecessary ED visits and facilitate direct-to-ward hospitalizations and thereby mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the healthcare system.

Antibiotic-Induced Neutropenia in Patients Receiving Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Our research objective was to describe the incidence and management of antibiotic-induced neutropenia in patients receiving outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) at our institution over a 7-year period. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients followed by the OPAT clinic from 1 July 2016 to 30 March 2022 who developed antibiotic-induced neutropenia (defined as an absolute neutrophil count of ≤1.5 × 109/L). Patients receiving vancomycin in the OPAT clinic received weekly laboratory monitoring, while those receiving other antibiotics received laboratory monitoring at week 3 of therapy. Out of the 2,513 treatment courses, 55 cases of antibiotic-induced neutropenia were identified, resulting in an incidence of 2.2 cases per 100 treatment courses (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 2.9). Of the 45 cases for which a sole cause was identified, the three most common intravenous antibiotic culprits were vancomycin (21/541; 3.9%), ceftriaxone (10/490; 2.0%), and cloxacillin (2/103; 1.9%). Five (9.1%) patients had symptoms accompanying neutropenia that warranted hospital admission. There were no deaths, and all patients recovered their neutrophil count after antibiotic discontinuation or completion. In nine cases (16.3%), the culprit beta-lactam antibiotic was changed to another beta-lactam agent containing a structurally different side chain, with successful recovery of the neutrophil count in 9/9 (100%). The highest risk of antibiotic-induced neutropenia was associated with vancomycin, ceftriaxone, and cloxacillin in our cohort. With standardized outpatient monitoring during the third week of OPAT, cases of neutropenia can be detected early and managed without hospitalization. Data from our study also support the safety of switching to alternate beta-lactams with structurally different side chains.

Addition of anaerobic coverage for treatment of biliary tract infections: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Objectives: To evaluate whether additional antibiotics that target anaerobes, including Bacteroides spp., are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with biliary tract infections (BTIs). Methods: This was a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort of adults aged ≥18 years with BTIs, admitted to hospital between 1 April 2015 and 30 March 2021. Eligible patients treated with antibiotics that provided coverage of anaerobes were compared with those treated with comparable regimens without anaerobic coverage. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality within 30 days or relapse within 90 days of source control or completion of antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), duration of antibiotic therapy and adverse drug reactions. ORs were calculated using a weighted generalized linear regression model with propensity-score matching. Results: Among 398 patients included, 209 were treated without anaerobic coverage and 189 with anaerobic coverage. After propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference in primary outcome between propensity-matched patients who received additional anaerobic coverage and those who did not [adjusted OR (aOR) 1.23; 95% CI 0.69-2.22)]. Those with anti-anaerobic coverage had longer LOS (aOR 4.85; 95% CI 1.68-13.98) and longer duration of antibiotic treatment (aOR 4.14; 95% CI 2.61-6.57) than those who did not receive additional anaerobic therapy, but not more adverse drug reactions (aOR 1.01; 95% CI 0.97-1.05). Conclusions: Omitting anti-anaerobic antibiotics may be a safe antimicrobial stewardship intervention. However, a randomized controlled trial may be warranted to definitively conclude whether additional anaerobic coverage in BTI treatment is necessary.

The utility of routine autologous bone-flap swab cultures in predicting post-cranioplasty infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of autologous bone-flap swab cultures performed at the time of cranioplasty in predicting postcranioplasty surgical site infection (SSI). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing craniectomy (with bone-flap storage in tissue bank), followed by delayed autologous bone-flap replacement cranioplasty between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2020. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic hospital. METHODS: We framed the bone-flap swab culture taken at the time of cranioplasty as a diagnostic test for predicting postcranioplasty SSI. We calculated, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Among 282 unique eligible cases, 16 (5.6%) developed SSI after cranioplasty. A high percentage of bone-flap swab cultures were positive at the time of craniectomy (66.7%) and cranioplasty (59.5%). Most organisms from bone-flap swab cultures were Cutibacterium acnes or coagulase-negative staphylococci (76%-85%), and most SSI pathogens were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (38%). Bone-flap swab culture had poor sensitivity (0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.31), specificity (0.4; 95% CI, 0.34-0.45), and positive likelihood ratio (0.12) for predicting postcranioplasty SSI. CONCLUSION: Overall, autologous bone-flap swab cultures performed at the time of cranioplasty have poor utility in predicting postcranioplasty SSI. Eliminating this low-value practice would result in significant workload reductions and associated healthcare costs.

Post-traumatic Fungal Keratitis and Endophthalmitis Caused by Coniochaeta Hoffmannii with Late Recurrence following Therapeutic Full-thickness Penetrating Keratoplasty.

BACKGROUND: To report a rare case of fungal keratitis and endophthalmitis due to Coniochaeta hoffmannii. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 71-year-old immunocompetent male sustained a corneal laceration, traumatic cataract, and retinal detachment due to penetrating injury from a nail pulled from a wooden deck. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by infectious keratitis. Fungal cultures, DNA sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacer sequence confirmed Coniochaeta hoffmannii. Topical and oral voriconazole treatments were initiated; however, due to impending perforation, a therapeutic corneal transplant was required. One year later, the patient developed a new corneal infiltrate at the graft-host junction: Corneal scrapings were culture positive for Coniochaeta hoffmannii. This was treated with topical and intrastromal voriconazole along with oral itraconazole 200 mg once daily for 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Coniochaeta hoffmannii may cause recalcitrant keratitis and endophthalmitis, which required longstanding antifungal treatment.

Trends in hospital antibiotic utilization during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A multicenter interrupted time-series analysis.

Objective: To describe the evolution of respiratory antibiotic prescribing during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic across 3 large hospitals that maintained antimicrobial stewardship services throughout the pandemic. Design: Retrospective interrupted time-series analysis. Setting: A multicenter study was conducted including medical and intensive care units (ICUs) from 3 hospitals within a Canadian epicenter for COVID-19. Methods: Interrupted time-series analysis was used to analyze rates of respiratory antibiotic utilization measured in days of therapy per 1,000 patient days (DOT/1,000 PD) in medical units and ICUs. Each of the first 3 waves of the pandemic were compared to the baseline. Results: Within the medical units, use of respiratory antibiotics increased during the first wave of the pandemic (rate ratio [RR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.38-2.25) but returned to the baseline in waves 2 and 3 despite more COVID-19 admissions. In ICU, the use of respiratory antibiotics increased in wave 1 (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.46) and wave 2 of the pandemic (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33) and returned to the baseline in the third wave, which had the most COVID-19 admissions. Conclusions: After an initial surge in respiratory antibiotic prescribing, we observed the normalization of prescribing trends at 3 large hospitals throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This trend may have been due to the timely generation of new research and guidelines developed with frontline clinicians, allowing for the active application of new research to clinical practice.

Use of virtual care by infectious disease specialists in Canada: A national survey.

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the type and extent of virtual care use among infectious disease specialists in Canada, with a focus on the clinical factors that influence the decision to provide virtual versus in-person care. Methods: Infectious disease physicians practicing in Canada were invited to complete a survey regarding their experiences with virtual care. The survey included 14 vignettes depicting new outpatient and post-hospital-discharge referrals. Participants were asked to select which (if any) virtual care modalities they would feel comfortable using and to specify a reason if they did not feel comfortable providing care virtually. Machine learning and natural language processing techniques were used to identify themes. Results: In total, 57 infectious disease physicians completed the survey. Respondents reported devoting 36.5% (SD, 18.4%) of their infectious disease practice to outpatient care, with 44.2% (SD, 23.2%) of it being delivered virtually. Respondents were more comfortable providing virtual care to post-hospital-discharge referrals who had been seen by an infectious disease physician compared to new outpatient referrals. When respondents were not comfortable with using any virtual care modality, the following common themes emerged: the need for physical examination, the importance of establishing a therapeutic relationship, the need for additional in-person tests or diagnostics, and patient counselling. Conclusion: This study provides a glimpse into the current state of virtual care use in Canada and some of the major themes that affect decision making for virtual versus in-person care.

Infective endocarditis of a native aortic valve due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa complicated by progressive multi-drug resistance.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of infective endocarditis secondary to Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be challenging because of this organism's ability to acquire antimicrobial resistance over time. METHODS: We describe a patient with native aortic valve infective endocarditis due to P. aeruginosa who developed progressive multi-drug resistance while on therapy. The resistance mechanisms were characterized using whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: We identified two mutations in subsequent isolates (dacB and OprD) that conferred resistance to anti-pseudomonal penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. The patient was treated with combination high-dose continuous infusion meropenem and ciprofloxacin therapy, in addition to bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement and repair of ventricular septal wall defect. Antibiotics were continued for 6 weeks post-cardiac surgery and the patient remains infection free 18 months post-completion of antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the ability of P. aeruginosa to acquire resistance mechanisms in response to selective antibiotic pressures in high-inoculum infections such as infective endocarditis. The mutations identified in this case report correlated well with the evolving antimicrobial resistance profile observed.

HISTORIQUE: Il peut être difficile de traiter une endocardite infectieuse causée par un Pseudomonas aeruginosa en raison de la capacité de cet organisme à acquérir une résistance aux antimicrobiens. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs décrivent un patient atteint d'une endocardite infectieuse de la valve aortique d'origine, attribuable à un P. aeruginosa, qui a acquis une multirésistance progressive pendant son traitement. Le mécanisme de résistance était caractérisé par le séquençage du génome entier. RÉSULTATS: Les auteurs ont dépisté deux mutations dans les isolats subséquents (dacB et OprD ), responsables d'une résistance aux pénicillines, aux céphalosporines et aux carbapénèmes antipseudomonaux. Le patient a reçu une polythérapie de perfusion continue de méropénem à forte dose et de ciprofloxacine, en plus du remplacement d'une valve aortique bioprothétique et de la réparation d'une communication interventriculaire. L'antibiothérapie s'est poursuivie six semaines après l'opération, et le patient n'avait pas d'infection 18 mois après la fin de l'antibiothérapie. CONCLUSION: Les cliniciens devraient savoir que le P. aeruginosa peut acquérir des mécanismes de résistance en réponse aux pressions antibiotiques sélectives en cas d'infections comportant un titre élevé d'inoculum comme une endocardite infectieuse. Les mutations constatées dans le présent rapport de cas étaient bien corrélées avec l'évolution du profil de résistance antimicrobienne observé.

Prevalence and predictors of persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic has affected hundreds of millions of people; early reports suggesting high rates of prolonged symptoms may be prone to selection bias. METHODS: In a program caring for all SARS-CoV-2 positive inpatients and outpatients between March to October 2020, and offering universal 90-day follow-up, we compared those who died prior to 90 days, not responding to follow-up, declining, or accepting follow-up. Among those seen or declining follow-up, we determined the prevalence and predictors of persistent symptoms. RESULTS: Among 993 patients, 21 (2.1%) died prior to 90 days, 506 (50.9%) did not respond, 260 (26.1%) declined follow-up because they were well, and 206 (20.7%) were fully assessed. Of 466 who responded to follow-up inquiry, 133 (28.5%) reported ≥1 persistent symptom, including constitutional (15.5%), psychiatric (14.2%), rheumatologic (13.1%), neurologic (13.1%), cardiorespiratory (12.0%), and gastrointestinal (1.7%). Predictors differed for each symptom type. Any persistent symptom was more common in older patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.18/5 years), those diagnosed in hospital (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.33) and those with initial constitutional and rheumatologic symptoms. Patients not responding to follow-up were younger and healthier at baseline. CONCLUSION: Persistent symptoms are common and diverse 3 months post-COVID-19 but are likely over-estimated by most reports.

HISTORIQUE: La pandémie touche des centaines de millions de gens. Les rapports précoces laissant croire à des symptômes prolongés pourraient être assujettis à un biais de sélection. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Dans un programme de soins auprès de tous les patients ambulatoires et hospitalisés ayant reçu un résultat positif au SRAS-CoV-2 entre mars et octobre 2020, assorti d'un suivi universel de 90 jours, les chercheurs ont comparé les personnes qui ont succombé avant 90 jours, n'ont pas répondu au suivi ou ont décliné ou accepté le suivi. Chez celles qui ont été vues ou ont décliné le suivi, ils ont déterminé la prévalence et les prédicteurs de symptômes persistants. RÉSULTATS: Chez les 993 patients, 21 (2,1 %) sont décédés avant les 90 jours, 506 (50,9 %) n'ont pas répondu, 260 (26,1 %) ont décliné le suivi parce qu'ils se sentaient bien et 206 (20,7 %) se sont soumis à une évaluation complète. Des 466 qui ont répondu à l'offre de suivi, 133 (28,5 %) ont signalé ressentir au moins un symptôme persistant, y compris d'ordre constitutionnel (15,5 %), psychiatrique (14,2 %), rhumatologique (13,1 %), neurologique (13,1 %), cardiorespiratoire (12,0 %) et gastro-intestinal (1,7 %). Les prédicteurs différaient en fonction de chaque type de symptômes. Les symptômes persistants étaient courants chez les personnes âgées (rapport de cotes corrigé [RCc] 1,11, IC à 95 %, 1,04 à 1,18/cinq ans), les personnes diagnostiquées à l'hôpital (RCc 2,03, IC à 95 %, 1,24 à 3,33) et celles dont les manifestations initiales comportaient des symptômes constitutionnels et rhumatologiques. Les patients qui ne répondaient pas au suivi étaient plus jeunes et en meilleure santé au départ. CONCLUSION: Les symptômes persistants sont courants et diversifiés trois mois après la COVID-19, mais sont probablement surestimés dans la plupart des rapports.

Evaluation of different antimicrobial stewardship models at a rehabilitation hospital: An interrupted time series (ITS) study.

Objective: To evaluate different prospective audit-and-feedback models on antimicrobial prescribing at a rehabilitation hospital. Design: Retrospective interrupted time series (ITS) and qualitative methods. Setting: A 178-bed rehabilitation hospital within an academic health sciences center. Methods: ITS analysis was used to analyze monthly days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days (PD) and monthly urine cultures ordered per 1,000 PD. We compared 2 sequential intervention periods to the baseline: (1) a period when a dedicated antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) pharmacist performed prospective audit and feedback and provided urine culture education followed by (2) a period when ward pharmacists performing audit and feedback. We conducted an electronic survey with physicians and semistructured interviews with pharmacists, respectively. Results: Audit and feedback conducted by an AMS pharmacist resulted in a 24.3% relative reduction in total DOT per 1,000 PD (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.99; P = .04), whereas we detected no difference between ward pharmacist audit and feedback and the baseline (IRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.53-2.70; P = .65). We detected no statistically significant change in monthly urine-culture orders between the AMS pharmacist period and the baseline (level coefficient, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.01; P = .07). Compared to baseline, the ward pharmacist period showed a statistically significant increase in urine-culture ordering over time (slope coefficient, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .02). The barrier most identified by pharmacists was insufficient time. Conclusions: Audit and feedback conducted by an AMS pharmacist in a rehabilitation hospital was associated with decreased antimicrobial use.

Improving mobility in the intensive care unit with a protocolized, early mobilization program: observations of a single center before-and-after the implementation of a multidisciplinary program.

BACKGROUND: Early intensive care unit (ICU) protocolized rehabilitative programs have been described previously, yet with differing starting time points and mostly on mechanically ventilated patients. We extended the concept to all admitted ICU patients and investigate the efficacy of early mobilization in improving mobility of the critically ill, address issues surrounding the timing and intensity of an early rehabilitative program. METHODS: Prospective cohorts of patients admitted consecutively before-and-after (control, n=92; intervention, n=90) the introduction of an early mobilization program in a single center, general hospital ICU. Improvement in mobility as assessed by ICU mobility score, on ICU admission and upon ICU discharge, was measured as a primary outcome. RESULTS: Those receiving early mobilization in the intensive care unit had higher ICU mobility score (2.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-4.61; P<0.001) upon discharge from the intensive care, with earlier out of bed mobilization on day 5 compared to the control group of day 21 (P<0.001). No differences were found in terms of mortality, intensive care hospitalization and subsequent hospitalization duration after discharge from ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we report that improvement in mobility score earlier in the course of intensive care hospitalization with the introduction of a protocolized early rehabilitative program.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: measures to improve the outlook in sub-Saharan Africa.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a leading public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa, and it is most prevalent in young adults (median 45 years [IQR 35-57]). Overall, outcomes are poor, with a median survival of 2·5 months after presentation. Major risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma are hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus, aflatoxin B1 exposure, and alcohol consumption, with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease slowly emerging as a risk factor over the past few years. Crucially, these risk factors are preventable and manageable with effective implementation of the HBV birth-dose vaccination, treatment of chronic viral hepatitis, provision of harm reduction services, and by decreasing aflatoxin B1 exposure and harmful alcohol consumption. Primary prevention is central to the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, especially in poorly resourced environments. Effective screening and surveillance programmes with recall policies need to be implemented, because detection and curative management of hepatocellular carcinoma is possible if it is detected at an early stage, even in countries with minimal resources, with appropriate upskilling of medical personnel. The establishment of centres of excellence with advanced diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities within countries should improve hepatocellular carcinoma outcomes and assist in driving the implementation of much needed systematic data systems focused on hepatocellular carcinoma to establish the accurate burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Such data would support the public health importance of hepatocellular carcinoma and provide a strong basis for advocacy, programme development, resource allocation, and monitoring of progress in reducing mortality.