Combining scoping review and concept analysis methodologies to clarify the meaning of rehabilitation potential after acquired brain injury.

PURPOSE: Clinicians make judgments about patients' rehabilitation potential because it is considered by many as a prerequisite for referral to rehabilitation. However, the concept is rarely defined. This research aimed to clarify the concept of rehabilitation potential in the context of acquired brain injury patient referral to post-acute rehabilitation. METHOD: Literature search (conducted in Medline, CINAHL and Embase) and article selection followed a scoping review methodology while a concept analysis methodology guided data extraction and analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen documents met inclusion criteria. Findings suggest four defining attributes of the concept. Rehabilitation potential (1) emerges from clinicians' interpretation of patient characteristics and is influenced by the health care environment, (2) involves the prediction of how a patient might improve with rehabilitation interventions, (3) is a multi-level concept and (4) can change over time. The most critical consequence to assessing a patient's rehabilitation potential is the impact on the patient's opportunity to access post-acute rehabilitation services. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation potential is a concept rooted in clinical reasoning. We propose an operational definition and a conceptual model to provide a solid foundation for future research to advance policy and clinical decision-making regarding equitable access to post-acute rehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRehabilitation potential is a concept rooted in clinical reasoning and emerges from clinicians' prediction of how a patient might improve with rehabilitation interventions.Rehabilitation potential is not a dichotomous concept but a multi-level concept with each level falling along a continuum.It may be inaccurate/inappropriate to definitively state that a patient has or does not have rehabilitation potential, as patients may demonstrate varying levels of rehabilitation potential.Rehabilitation potential can change with time requiring re-assessment to readjust recommendations accordingly with regards to appropriate rehabilitation interventions at any given time.

Factors influencing clinicians' referral or admission decisions for post-acute stroke or traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A scoping review.

Demand for post-acute stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation outweighs resource availability. Every day, clinicians face the challenging task of deciding which patient will benefit or not from rehabilitation. The objectives of this scoping review were to map and compare factors reported by clinicians as influencing referral or admission decisions to post-acute rehabilitation for stroke and TBI patients, to identify most frequently reported factors and those perceived as most influential. We searched four major databases for articles published between 1946 and January 2021. Articles were included if they reported clinicians' perceptions, investigated referral or admission decisions to post-acute rehabilitation, and focused on patients with stroke or TBI. Twenty articles met inclusion criteria. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework was used to guide data extraction and summarizing. Patient-related factors most frequently reported by clinicians were age, mental status prior to stroke or TBI, and family support. The two latter were ranked among the most influential by clinicians working with stroke patients, whereas age was ranked of low importance. Organizational factors were reported to influence decisions (particularly the availability of post-acute care services) as well as clinicians' characteristics (eg, knowledge). Moreover, clinicians' prediction of patient outcome ranked among the most important driver of referral or admission decisions by clinicians working with stroke patients. Findings highlight the complex nature of decision-making regarding patient selection for rehabilitation and provide insight on important factors that frontline clinicians need to consider when having to make rapid decisions in high-pressured acute care environments.

Clinical reasoning underlying acute care occupational therapists' assessment of rehabilitation potential after stroke or brain injury: A constructivist grounded theory study.

INTRODUCTION: In acute care hospitals, clinicians are expected to rapidly provide recommendations regarding patients' rehabilitation potential and candidacy for postacute rehabilitation. Some studies have investigated factors influencing referral to rehabilitation, but few have examined clinical reasoning underlying referral decisions. This study aimed to investigate what occupational therapists were thinking about (factors influencing reasoning), how they reasoned (thought processes) when evaluating stroke or traumatic brain injury patients' rehabilitation potential, and how they decided on referral to postacute rehabilitation. METHODS: Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, the clinical reasoning of 10 acute care occupational therapists working in a large Canadian city was examined. Participant recruitment, data collection, and analysis were performed simultaneously following theoretical sampling procedures. Therapists' thoughts on patients' rehabilitation potential were collected twice (during chart consultation and initial patient assessment) using think-aloud protocols and semi-structured interviews. Constant comparison, memoing, and diagramming methods were employed during coding to help categorisation and conceptualisation. FINDINGS: Numerous patient, clinician, and organisation-related factors were found to influence clinical reasoning. Occupational therapists interpreted these factors in an attempt to (1) predict recovery, (2) estimate rehabilitation potential, and (3) determine rehabilitation candidacy. They used two types of thought processes: (1) building a representation of patients' rehabilitation potential (involving eight steps including gathering and interpreting factors); (2) activating bottom-up and top-down scripts (comparing the expected impact of impairments on activity performance to behaviours observed during activity performance). Furthermore, an algorithm was developed describing how occupational therapists decide on referral to postacute rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Findings can be used to teach students and novice occupational therapists how to identify and interpret key factors in the assessment of stroke or traumatic brain injury patients' rehabilitation potential. Results also provide insight on cognitive processes that can be taught for efficient assessment of rehabilitation potential and decision-making regarding referral to postacute rehabilitation.

Providing Verbal Assistance When Assessing Individuals Living with a Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background. Occupational therapists play a major role in identifying the assistance needs of individuals living with a traumatic brain injury. However, to obtain an accurate assessment, verbal assistance should be provided only when necessary, according to the person's needs. Purpose. This study aimed to understand (1) how verbal assistance is provided during an evaluation of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and (2) why it is provided in this manner. Method. Interviews were conducted with three expert occupational therapists using their own videotaped evaluation and a "think-aloud" method to explore their clinical reasoning when providing verbal assistance. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings. The process of providing verbal assistance was recognized as flexible and nonlinear, and influenced by various factors including the participants' level of understanding of the client's abilities. Implications. This information will help therapists better understand how and when to provide verbal assistance when assessing their clients.

Assessing Rehabilitation Eligibility of Older Patients: An Ethical Analysis of the Impact of Bias.

Hospitalized older patients are more vulnerable to physical or cognitive functional decline. Inpatient rehabilitation programs improve significantly their functional status and may prevent their admission to nursing homes. While inpatient rehabilitation institutions have established admission criteria that can be seen as objective, the risk of bias remains and raises the question of equitable access for more vulnerable populations such as older patients. This paper reviews some established eligibility criteria for inpatient rehabilitation by examining a framework used in Montreal, Québec, Canada for assessing rehabilitation eligibility and by applying this framework to a case study. It also highlights the unique ethical challenges presented by the assessment of older patients. We conclude that in order to appropriately protect the vulnerable population of older patients in the context of priority setting and allocation of scarce resources, there is a need to establish more specific criteria that can better guide the assessment of this particular population.

Development and Pilot Testing of a Measure of Potential Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of a Standardized Assessment Tool.

INTRODUCTION: Standardized assessment tools (SATs) are essential to evidence-based assessment practices. Identifying what impedes clinicians' use of a SAT can help tailor strategies promoting its use in clinical practice. This article presents the development of the "Measure of potential barriers and facilitators to the Use of a Standardized assessment Tool (MUST)" questionnaire. Preliminary findings are also reported from pilot testing in which the MUST was used to investigate occupational therapists' (OTs) perceptions of potential barriers and facilitators to the use of the Activities of Daily Living Profile (ADL Profile), a SAT evaluating independence in everyday activities of cognitively impaired adults. METHODS: The MUST was administered to 41 OTs attending continuing education workshops on the ADL Profile. Internal consistency was explored using Chronbach alpha. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze scores for each statement. RESULTS: Internal consistency for subscales related to clinicians' characteristics (α = 0.7) and to the SAT's characteristics (α = 0.8) were adequate but lower for the subscale related to the clinical setting (α = 0.6). OTs' perceptions of potential barriers were associated with: OTs' perceived self-efficacy; ADL Profile's applicability to OTs' clienteles; ADL Profile's compatibility with values promoted in the work setting and with clients' preferences; limited peer support; time to implement the ADL Profile. DISCUSSION: The MUST, a theory-informed questionnaire, may prove useful in identifying potential barriers needing to be addressed in continuing education training promoting the use of SATs by clinicians. The MUST is quick to administer and initial testing provides support for its internal consistency.

Post-acute care referral and inpatient rehabilitation admission criteria for persons with brain injury across two Canadian provinces.

PURPOSE: Investigate health care providers' perceptions of referral and admission criteria to brain injury inpatient rehabilitation in two Canadian provinces. METHODS: Health care providers (n = 345) from brain injury programs (13 acute care and 16 rehabilitation facilities) participated in a cross-sectional web-based survey. The participants rated the likelihood of patients (traumatic brain injury and cerebral hypoxia) to be referred/admitted to rehabilitation and the influence of 19 additional factors (e.g., tracheostomy). The participants reported the perceived usefulness of referral/admission policies and assessment tools used. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent acute care and 98% rehabilitation participants reported the person with traumatic brain injury would likely or very likely be referred/admitted to rehabilitation compared to respectively 43% and 53% for the patient with hypoxia. Two additional factors significantly decreased the likelihood of referral/admission: older age and the combined presence of minimal learning ability, memory impairment and physical aggression. Some significant inter-provincial variations in the perceived referral/admission procedure were observed. Most participants reported policies were helpful. Similar assessment tools were used in acute care and rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers appear to consider various factors when making decisions regarding referral and admission to rehabilitation. Variations in the perceived likelihood of referral/admission suggest a need for standardized referral/admission practices. Implications for Rehabilitation Various patient characteristics influence clinicians' decisions when selecting appropriate candidates for inpatient rehabilitation. In this study, acute care clinicians were less likely to refer patients that their rehabilitation counter parts would likely have admitted and a patient with hypoxic brain injury was less likely to be referred or admitted in rehabilitation than a patient with a traumatic brain injury. Such discrepancies suggest that policy-makers, managers and clinicians should work together to develop and implement more standardized referral practices and more specific admission criteria in order to ensure equitable access to brain injury rehabilitation services.

Exploring factors influencing occupational therapists' perception of patients' rehabilitation potential after acquired brain injury.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Clinical practice guidelines advocate for early involvement of rehabilitation professionals in screening acquired brain injury patients' rehabilitation needs and determining the required rehabilitation services. Little is yet known about the nature of occupational therapists' role in this context. This exploratory study sought to identify factors influencing occupational therapists' perception of acquired brain injury patients' rehabilitation potential for inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: A qualitative approach was used to analyse data from a focus group involving 12 occupational therapists working in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation. A consensus-seeking technique was used to identify patient-related factors participants perceived as most important to consider when assessing rehabilitation potential. The transcription of the group discussion was analysed using an interpretive description approach to identify additional factors influencing occupational therapists' perception. RESULTS: Participants agreed on 11 patient-related factors most important to consider: age, behaviour, cognitive abilities, endurance, home environment, medical status, observed improvement in acute care post-injury, physical abilities, post-injury functional status, pre-injury functional status, patient and family expectations. Additional factors included the influence of the organisational context (i.e. acute care and broader health care context) as well as occupational therapists' professional expertise, knowledge of scientific evidence, concerns for ethical decisions and interpretive activities (i.e. clinician's interpretation of patients' characteristics in light of all other factors). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that assessing rehabilitation potential is a complex process that goes beyond strictly appraising patients' characteristics. Additional factors influence clinicians' perception of patients' rehabilitation potential. Clinicians should pay more attention to these factors when making evidence-based decisions regarding patients' potential to benefit from rehabilitation.