T-cell-rich B-cell lymphomas: diagnosis and response to therapy of 44 patients.

PURPOSE: Clinicopathologic features of 44 patients with well-documented T-cell-rich B-cell lymphomas (TCRBCLs) were reviewed to determine if there were distinguishing clinical characteristics and to evaluate the responsiveness to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients had de novo TCRBCL, while three patients had a prior diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Seventeen TCRBCLs were identified from a retrospective analysis of 176 lymphomas diagnosed before 1988 as peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCLs). The initial pathologic diagnosis was incorrect in 36 of 44 cases (82%), usually due to the absence of adequate immunophenotypic and/or genotypic studies at the initial study. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 53 years (range, 17 to 92), and the male-to-female ratio was 1.4:1. B symptoms were present in 22 of 41 patients (54%); splenomegaly was detected in 11 patients (25%). Clinical stage at diagnosis was as follows: I (n = 8), II (n = 6), III (n = 15), IV (n = 14), and unstaged (n = 1). Although therapy was heterogeneous, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years for patients with de novo TCRBCL were 29% and 46%, respectively. A complete response (CR) to combination chemotherapy for intermediate-grade lymphomas was observed in 16 of 26 patients (62%); 11 of these patients (42%) had a continuous CR, compared with one of 14 patients (7%) who received radiation therapy or therapy for low-grade lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease (HD) (P < .05). However, there was no difference in OS between patients who received chemotherapy for intermediate-grade lymphoma versus other therapies (49% v 48%) due to a high response rate to salvage therapies, including seven patients without disease after marrow transplantation. CONCLUSION: TCRBCLs are difficult to recognize without immunoperoxidase studies. Patients with TCRBCL have clinical features similar to patients with other large B-cell lymphomas, except they may have more splenomegaly and advanced-stage disease; they should receive combination chemotherapy directed at large-cell lymphomas.

High-dose, brief duration, multiagent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated a high-intensity inpatient regimen using augmented but subtransplantation doses of multiple agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Two high-dose courses were given in an attempt to improve the efficacy of high-dose regimens using a single course. METHODS: Forty women received treatment between October 1988 and October 1991. The median age was 38 years (range, 24-56 years). Twenty-five patients were receiving their first chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 15 patients had received one or more prior regimens. The patients received two courses of chemotherapy, which consisted of the following: cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 2; doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 2; cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10; 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 on days 8, 9, and 10 (continuous infusion); methotrexate 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 15 and 22; leucovorin 15 mg/m2 i.v. or by mouth for four doses beginning 24 hours after methotrexate. Etoposide 400 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2, and 3 was substituted for doxorubicin in 14 patients who had received prior doxorubicin. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 40 patients (73%) had objective response to therapy, with 10 (25%) complete responses. Four patients who obtained a complete response remain disease-free at 14, 21, 28, and 32 months, respectively; all of these patients received this regimen as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was severe, with median durations of leukocytes less than 1000/microliters and platelets less than 50,000/microliters of 15 days (range, 7-48 days) and 13 days (range, 3-49 days), respectively. Moderate or severe mucositis occurred in 56 of 68 courses. Four patients (10%) had treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen produced high overall response and complete response rates compared with standard regimens. However, only 15% of patients who received this therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer remain disease-free, and median response duration was shorter than that reported using high-dose therapy with bone marrow support. Toxicity with this regimen was greater than anticipated, although myelosuppression and stomatitis would be reduced by the use of cytokines. This regimen does not improve results achieved with standard therapy sufficiently to justify its toxicity and expense.