Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 33(3): 113-8, 2005 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15848082

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the gynaecological symptoms of women who have undergone an induced abortion to those who have not. We also compare the gynaecological side effects, in particular the infectious symptoms, following an induced abortion, according to the abortion technique, medical and surgical, in the year after the abortion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A representative sample of 2863 women, aged 18 to 44, was interviewed by telephone between September 2000 and January 2001. Of these women, 401 declared an abortion in the last 5 years. Analysis of the gynaecological side effects according to the abortion technique was performed among the 199 women who terminated their pregnancy before the 8th week of amenorrhoea. RESULTS: Women with a history of induced abortion had a higher sexual risk profile than those with no such history. They also more frequently reported genital infectious symptoms. The comparison between medical and surgical abortions shows that women who had a medical abortion were more likely to report heavy and prolonged bleeding. On the contrary, we found no difference of infectious symptoms between the two techniques. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our study does not support the idea of a reduction of infectious complications related to medical as opposed to surgical abortions. However, given the rapid diffusion of medical abortion, it seems important to carry on the investigations on the side effects related to medical abortions, in order to prevent them if necessary.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortifacient Agents/adverse effects , Abortifacient Agents/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Infections/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects
2.
Acta Paediatr ; 93(10): 1340-5, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15499955

ABSTRACT

AIM: To estimate the re-hospitalization rate of extremely preterm children during infancy and associated factors after the recent improvement in survival rates. METHOD: The cohort included all children born before 29 wk of gestation in nine French regions in 1997. All admissions between discharge from initial hospitalization and 9 mo after birth were considered. Factors studied included the child's characteristics at birth and during neonatal hospitalization, risk factors for infection after discharge and parents' socio-demographic characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for re-hospitalization for all reasons and for respiratory disorders were obtained from logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 376 children, 178 were re-admitted at least once (47.3%; 95% CI: 42.3-52.4). Fifty-five percent of the hospitalized children were admitted at least once for respiratory disorders. The re-hospitalization rate was higher for children who had had chronic lung disease (aOR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3-3.7), those initially discharged between August and October (aOR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-5.1) or between November and January (aOR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5-6.8), and children living with other children under six (aOR: 3.4; 95 %CI: 1.6-7.5). Re-hospitalizations were associated with neither gestational age nor the duration of neonatal hospitalization. Adjusted odds ratios for re-hospitalization for respiratory tract disorders were very similar to those for the overall hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Infants born before 29 wk have a very high risk of re-hospitalization. The associated factors can help define high-risk groups at discharge from the neonatal unit who need special surveillance.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature, Diseases/therapy , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Respiratory Tract Diseases/therapy , Risk Factors
3.
Arch Pediatr ; 10(11): 960-8, 2003 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14613689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of health and social services between children born before 33 weeks (very preterm), children born at 33 or 34 weeks (moderately preterm) and children born at 39 or 40 weeks (full term). POPULATION AND METHODS: All very preterm children born in 1997 in nine French regions and a representative sample of the two other groups were followed up since birth. Data on the use of services between discharge from initial neonatal hospitalisation and the 9 months after birth were obtained by mail questionnaire filled in by parents. RESULTS: 38.2% of very preterm children, 24.3% of moderately preterm children and 10.3% of full term children were admitted to hospital at least once. Respiratory tract disorder was the main reason for rehospitalisation of very preterm children. The total number of visits, visits to specialists, and chest therapy were more frequent among very preterm children than among the two other groups. CONCLUSION: Medical care of very preterm children is intensive after discharge from initial neonatal hospitalisation. Need of services are also substantial for moderately preterm children.


Subject(s)
Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Premature , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Social Work , Cohort Studies , Female , France , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Patient Discharge , Respiratory Tract Diseases/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...