Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 45(6): 305-10, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8580473

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the range of health surveillance activities which can be utilized in the workplace by occupational health professionals for assessing fitness for work and contributing to the prevention of occupational illness and promotion of good health. The systematic approach described categorizes health surveillance procedures into occupational or non-occupational, risk-based or unfocused, and as primary, secondary or tertiary preventive measures. All categories of health surveillance are currently being practised to some extent, but the type of surveillance may not match the needs of the workplace in some situation. In order to aid health professionals in deciding which procedures should be implemented, recommendations based on an assessment of health risks are made. The key proposal is to establish a minimum level of periodic health surveillance for all workers based on a targeted lifestyle health risk assessment and a structured health questionnaire. Additional procedures can then be added sequentially as appropriate to manage any health risks in the workplace. The role of the unfocused periodic general medical examination is discussed in the context of the systematic approach and allows occupational professionals to critically appraise its usefulness.


Subject(s)
Health Status Indicators , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Health , Population Surveillance , Health Promotion , Humans , Life Style , Workplace
2.
Occup Environ Med ; 52(2): 129-33, 1995 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7757166

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of allergy to laboratory animals (ALA) during the first two years of employment, and to study the effect on ALA of atopy and sensitisation. METHODS: A follow up prospective study of ALA at the Zeneca (formerly ICI) Research Laboratories. RESULTS: The incidence of the disease during the first year of employment has remained at about 10% since the mid-1980s. This compares with an incidence of 37% in the early 1980s. The reduction in incidence and its maintenance at a lower level is thought to be due to the introduction and management of improved engineering controls, working practices, and educational programmes designed to reduce exposure to allergens from laboratory animals. The underlying incidence of immunological sensitisation to animals (the presence of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies to animal allergens) is much higher (40% after one and 53% after two years of exposure). Both atopic diathesis and presensitisation to laboratory animals increased the likelihood that a person would develop ALA. CONCLUSION: Neither factor predicted the disease accurately so their use should be restricted to the identification of people who may be more susceptible to the development of ALA (and thus who may need to pay particular attention to the use of personal protective equipment) rather than to their exclusion.


Subject(s)
Animals, Laboratory , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , England/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Guinea Pigs , Humans , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Immunologic Tests , Incidence , Medical Laboratory Personnel , Mice , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Prospective Studies , Rabbits , Rats , Swine , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...