Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography: Does Computed Tomography Have Incremental Value in All Appropriate Use Criteria Categories?

PURPOSE: Cardiac imaging expenditures have come under scrutiny, and a focus on appropriate use criteria (AUC) has arisen to ensure cost-effective resource utilization. Although AUC has been developed by clinical experts, it has not undergone rigorous quality assurance testing to ensure that inappropriate indications for testing yield little clinical benefit. The objective of the study was to evaluate the potential incremental prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in the different AUC categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients enrolled into a cardiac CT Registry were collated. Patient indications were reviewed and based on the 2010 AUC (appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate). Patients were followed-up for death, myocardial infarction (MI), and late revascularization, with the primary composite endpoint being cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and late revascularization. The prognostic value of CCTA over clinical variables in each of the AUC categories was assessed. RESULTS: Indications for CCTA were appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate in 1284 (66.5%), 312 (16.2%), and 334 (17.3%) patients, respectively. Rates of all-cause of death, cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and late revascularization were similar across patients with appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate indications for CCTA. Moreover, in each AUC category, CCTA had incremental prognostic value over a routine clinical risk score (National Cholesterol Education Program) with hazard ratios of 9.98, 7.39, and 5.61. CONCLUSIONS: CCTA has incremental prognostic value in all AUC categories, even when the reason for the study was deemed "inappropriate." This suggests that CCTA may still have clinical value in "inappropriate" indications and that further quality assurance AUC studies are needed.

Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography: Impact on Diagnostic Utility.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) guidelines for cardiac computed tomography (CCT) were developed to limit testing to reasonable clinical settings. However, significant testing is still done for inappropriate indications. This study investigates the impact of AUC on evaluability of CCT to determine if inappropriate tests result in a greater proportion of nondiagnostic results. METHODS: Investigators reviewed the medical records of 2417 consecutive patients who underwent CCT at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. We applied the 2010 AUC and classified them as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. Unclassifiable tests, as well as those with uncertain appropriateness, were excluded from the final analysis. Cardiac computed tomography results were classified as diagnostic if (1) all coronary segments were visualized, evaluable, and without obstructive stenosis; or (2) obstructive coronary artery disease with greater than 50% diameter stenosis in at least 1 coronary artery. All other test results were considered nondiagnostic. RESULTS: Of the 1984 patients included in the final analysis, 1522 patients (76.7%) had indications that were appropriate, whereas the remaining 462 (23.3%) were inappropriate. Inappropriate tests resulted in a higher rate of nondiagnostic results compared with appropriate CCT (9.0% vs 6.2%, P = 0.034). Inappropriate tests also had significantly more studies with nonevaluable segments than appropriate tests (24.5% vs 16.4%, P < 0.001) and were more likely to reveal obstructive coronary disease than appropriate CCT (50.5% vs 32.7%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac computed tomography done for inappropriate indications may be associated with lower diagnostic yield and could impact future downstream resource utilization and health care costs.

Resident Physicians Choices of Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to identify practice patterns of Canadian resident physicians pertaining to stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines. A Web-based survey consisting of 16 multiple-choice questions was distributed to 11 academic centres. Questions involved identification of risks of stroke, bleeding, and selection of appropriate therapy in clinical scenarios that involve a patient with AF with a Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (CHADS2) score of 3 and no absolute contraindications to anticoagulation. There were 1014 total respondents, of whom 570 were internal, 247 family, 137 emergency medicine, and 60 adult cardiology residents. For a patient with a new diagnosis of AF, warfarin was chosen by 80.3%, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) by 60.3%, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) by 7.2% of residents. To a patient with a history of gastrointestinal bleed during ASA treatment, warfarin was recommended by 75.1%, NOACs by 36.1%, ASA by 12.1%, and 4% were unsure. For a patient with a history of an intracranial bleed, warfarin was recommended by 38.8%, NOACs by 23%, ASA by 24.8%, and 18.2% were unsure. For a patient taking warfarin who had a labile international normalized ratio, 89% would switch to a NOAC and 29.5% would continue warfarin. This study revealed that, across a wide sampling of disciplines and centres, resident physician choices of anticoagulation in nonvalvular AF differ significantly from contemporary Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of idiopathic premature ventricular contractions originating from the right ventricular outflow tract: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Frequent idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) have been associated with left ventricular cardiomyopathy. Idiopathic PVCs often originate from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is being used as a treatment to alleviate symptoms. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate RFCA for the treatment of frequent idiopathic PVCs on heart function. METHODS AND RESULTS: A literature search was conducted using Medline and Embase to identify studies evaluating the effects of RFCA as treatment for PVCs originating from the RVOT. Articles were chosen if they reported the effect of RFCA on the quantity of PVCs or ventricular function. Only studies in English were included. Articles were excluded if they did not separate results for PVCs originating from areas other than the RVOT. A total of 450 articles were retrieved from electronic searches, and 14 articles were included in this systematic review. Six of these were meta-analyzed (N = 70) and showed a reduction in the total number of PVCs in 24 hours after RFCA by a mean of -30089.44 confidence interval [CI]: -31658.47, -28520.40, P < 0.00001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was reported in five of the 14 studies, which included 108 patients. RFCA significantly improved LVEF by a mean of 10.36 (CI: 8.75, 11.97, P < 0.00001) in patients with frequent PVCs from the RVOT. The remaining studies reported their results differently and were not included in the meta-analyses but were described separately. CONCLUSIONS: RFCA reduces the number of PVCs and improves the cardiac function in patients with idiopathic frequent PVCs originating from the RVOT.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treatment of sleep apnoea: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: Sleep apnoea (SA) is a common problem among congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Evidence has shown that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality associated with CHF. The aim of this paper was to review studies evaluating the reduction of the Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (AHI) in patients with SA after treatment with CRT and to perform a meta-analysis to estimate the true effect of CRT on SA. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in Medline and Embase to identify studies reporting on the effects of CRT on SA. A hand search of five major cardiology societies was performed to identify any unpublished studies through structured abstracts submitted to conference proceedings. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to include a comparison of CRT vs. no pacing and use AHI as an outcome. Non-English studies were excluded. Nine manuscripts and five abstracts were identified for review. Six manuscripts and three abstracts were included in meta-analysis, which included 170 patients. After treatment with CRT, a significant reduction in AHI was found in patients with central sleep apnoea (CSA) with a mean reduction of -13.05 (CI -16.74 to -9.36; P < 0.00001) but not in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (13.32; CI -9.04 to 2.39; P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the severity of SA. Major effects are seen in patients with CSA. The presence of SA may be an additional consideration when deciding on which heart failure patients will receive CRT.

Review of systematic reviews on acute procedural pain in children in the hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: Acute pain is a common experience for hospitalized children. Despite mounting research on treatments for acute procedure-related pain, it remains inadequately treated. OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise all systematic reviews on the effectiveness of acute procedure-related pain management in hospitalized children. METHODS: Published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of acute procedure-related pain in hospitalized children aged one to 18 years were evaluated. Electronic searches were conducted in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and PsycINFO. Two reviewers independently selected articles for review and assessed their quality using a validated seven-point quality assessment measure. Any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. RESULTS: Of 1469 published articles on interventions for acute pain in hospitalized children, eight systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. However, only five of these reviews were of high quality. Critical appraisal of pharmacological pain interventions indicated that amethocaine was superior to EMLA (AstraZeneca Canada Inc) for reducing needle pain. Distraction and hypnosis were nonpharmacological interventions effective for management of acute procedure-related pain in hospitalized children. CONCLUSIONS: There is growing evidence of rigorous evaluations of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies for acute procedure-related pain in children; however, the evidence underlying some commonly used strategies is limited. The present review will enable the creation of a future research plan to facilitate clinical decision making and to develop clinical policy for managing acute procedure-related pain in children.