Verifying measurements on Siemens Atellica® instruments using clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications.

Measurements on clinical chemistry analysers must be verified to demonstrate applicability to their intended clinical use. We verified the performance of measurements on the Siemens Atellica® Solution chemistry analysers against the clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications, CAAPS, including the component of intra-individual biological variation, CVI. The relative standard uncertainty of measurement, i.e. analytical variation, CVA, was estimated for six example measurands, haemoglobin A1c in whole blood (B-HbA1c), albumin in urine (U-Alb), and the following measurands in plasma: sodium (P-Na), pancreatic amylase (P-AmylP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P-LDL-C), and creatinine (P-Crea). Experimental CVA was calculated from single-instrument imprecision using control samples, variation between measurements on parallel instruments, and estimation of bias with pooled patient specimens. Each obtained CVA was compared with previously developed CAAPS. The calculated CVA was 1.4% for B-HbA1c (CAAPS 1.9% for single diagnostic testing, CAAPS 2.0% for monitoring after duplicate tests; IFCC units), 10.9% for U-Alb (CAAPS 44.9%), 1.2% for P-Na (CAAPS 0.6%, after triplicate testing 1.5%), 8.2% for P-AmylP (CAAPS 22.9%). The CVA was 4.9% for P-LDL-C (CAAPS for cardiovascular risk stratification 4.9% after four replicates), and 4.2% for P-Crea (CAAPS 8.0%). Three of the six measurands fulfilled the estimated clinical need. Results from P-Na measurements indicate a general need for improving the P-Na assays for emergency patients. It is necessary to consider CVI when creating diagnostic targets for laboratory tests, as emphasised by the CAAPS estimates of B-HbA1c and P-LDL-C.

Changing Immunochemistry Platforms: Thyroid Function Test Comparison and Reference Intervals Based on Clinical Needs.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction relies on thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), and free tri-iodothyronine (FT3) tests against valid reference intervals (RIs). We changed the immunoassay platform from Abbott Architect to Siemens Atellica and aimed to establish Atellica RIs based on laboratory information system (LIS) patient data. METHODS: Atellica thyroid hormone immunoassays were verified against those of Architect. Real-life patient results were retrieved from LIS. A single result per patient dataset was used to establish the RIs by the indirect method. RESULTS: Atellica and Architect assays correlated well but Atellica showed a positive bias between 13% and 53%, the largest for FT4. Variations of the Atellica assays were ≤4%. The 95% Atellica RIs were 0.4-3.8 mU/L for TSH, 0.9-1.6 ng/dL for FT4, and 227-416 pg/dL for FT3. Considering the accumulating clinical experience with Atellica, the RIs for clinical use were adjusted as 0.5-4.0 mU/L, 0.9-1.8 ng/dL, and 169-409 pg/dL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We verified thyroid hormone RIs for Atellica by the indirect method for the first time. Our model proved reliable for selecting results of presumably healthy individuals from LIS data. Critical review of the RIs with local endocrinologists is essential.

Short interruptions of TNF-inhibitor treatment can be associated with treatment failure in patients with immune-mediated diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of immune-mediated diseases has increased in the past decades and despite the use of biological treatments all patients do not achieve remission. The aim of this study was to characterise the reasons for short interruptions during treatment with two commonly used TNF-inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab and to analyse the possible effects of the interruptions on immunisation and switching the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This case-control study was based on retrospective analyses of patient records and a questionnaire survey to clinicians. A total of 370 patients (194 immunised cases and 172 non-immunised controls, 4 excluded) were enrolled from eight hospitals around Finland. Eleven different diagnoses were represented, and the largest patient groups were those with inflammatory bowel or rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Treatment interruptions were associated with immunisation in patients using infliximab (p < .001) or adalimumab (p < .000001). Patients with treatment interruptions were more likely to have been treated with more than one biological agent compared to those without treatment interruptions. This was particularly prominent among patients with a rheumatic disease (p < .00001). The most frequent reason for a treatment interruption among the cases was an infection, whereas among the control patients it was remission. The median length of one interruption was one month (interquartile range 1-3 months). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the interruptions of the treatment with TNF-inhibitors expose patients to immunisation and increase the need for drug switching. These findings stress the importance of careful judgement of the need for a short interruption in the biological treatment in clinical work, especially during non-severe infections.