Visualization of endogenous G proteins on endosomes and other organelles.

Classical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling takes place in response to extracellular stimuli and involves receptors and heterotrimeric G proteins located at the plasma membrane. It has recently been established that GPCR signaling can also take place from intracellular membrane compartments, including endosomes that contain internalized receptors and ligands. While the mechanisms of GPCR endocytosis are well understood, it is not clear how internalized receptors are supplied with G proteins. To address this gap we use gene editing, confocal microscopy, and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to study the distribution and trafficking of endogenous G proteins. We show here that constitutive endocytosis is sufficient to supply newly internalized endocytic vesicles with 20-30% of the G protein density found at the plasma membrane. We find that G proteins are present on early, late, and recycling endosomes, are abundant on lysosomes, but are virtually undetectable on the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and the medial Golgi apparatus. Receptor activation does not change heterotrimer abundance on endosomes. Our results provide a detailed subcellular map of endogenous G protein distribution, suggest that G proteins may be partially excluded from nascent endocytic vesicles, and are likely to have implications for GPCR signaling from endosomes and other intracellular compartments.

In-Cell Arrestin-Receptor Interaction Assays.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent ∼30% of current drug targets. Ligand binding to these receptors activates G proteins and arrestins, which function in different signaling pathways. Given that functionally selective or biased ligands preferentially activate one of these two groups of pathways, they may be superior medications for certain disease states. The identification of such ligands requires robust drug screening assays for both G protein and arrestin activity. This unit describes protocols for assays that monitor reversible arrestin recruitment to GPCRs in living cells using either bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) or nanoluciferase complementation (NanoLuc). Two types of assays can be used: one configuration directly measures arrestin recruitment to a GPCR fused to a protein tag at its intracellular C-terminus, whereas the other configuration detects arrestin translocation to the plasma membrane in response to activation of an unmodified GPCR. Together, these assays are powerful tools for studying dynamic interactions between GPCRs and arrestins. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Receptor-arrestin BRET assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to receptors Basic Protocol 2: Receptor-arrestin NANOBIT assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to receptors Alternative Protocol 1: BRET assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to the plasma membrane Alternative Protocol 2: NANOBIT assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to the plasma membrane Support Protocol 1: Optimization of polyethylenimine (PEI) concentration for transfection.

GLP-1R signaling neighborhoods associate with the susceptibility to adverse drug reactions of incretin mimetics.

G protein-coupled receptors are important drug targets that engage and activate signaling transducers in multiple cellular compartments. Delineating therapeutic signaling from signaling associated with adverse events is an important step towards rational drug design. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a validated target for the treatment of diabetes and obesity, but drugs that target this receptor are a frequent cause of adverse events. Using recently developed biosensors, we explored the ability of GLP-1R to activate 15 pathways in 4 cellular compartments and demonstrate that modifications aimed at improving the therapeutic potential of GLP-1R agonists greatly influence compound efficacy, potency, and safety in a pathway- and compartment-selective manner. These findings, together with comparative structure analysis, time-lapse microscopy, and phosphoproteomics, reveal unique signaling signatures for GLP-1R agonists at the level of receptor conformation, functional selectivity, and location bias, thus associating signaling neighborhoods with functionally distinct cellular outcomes and clinical consequences.

Sequence-directed concentration of G protein-coupled receptors in COPII vesicles.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest superfamily of plasma membrane signaling proteins. However, virtually nothing is known about their recruitment to COPII vesicles for forward delivery after synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Here, we demonstrate that some GPCRs are highly concentrated at ER exit sites (ERES) before COPII budding. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) and CXCR4 concentration are directed by a di-acidic motif and a 9-residue domain, respectively, and these motifs also control receptor ER-Golgi traffic. We further show that AT2R interacts with Sar1 GTPase and that distinct GPCRs have different ER-Golgi transport rates via COPII which is independent of their concentration at ERES. Collectively, these data demonstrate that GPCRs can be actively captured by COPII via specific motifs and direct interaction with COPII components that in turn affects their export dynamics, and provide important insights into COPII targeting and forward trafficking of nascent GPCRs.

Pathway selectivity in Frizzleds is achieved by conserved micro-switches defining pathway-determining, active conformations.

The class Frizzled of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), consisting of ten Frizzled (FZD1-10) paralogs and Smoothened, remains one of the most enigmatic GPCR families. This class mediates signaling predominantly through Disheveled (DVL) or heterotrimeric G proteins. However, the mechanisms underlying pathway selection are elusive. Here we employ a structure-driven mutagenesis approach in combination with an extensive panel of functional signaling readouts to investigate the importance of conserved state-stabilizing residues in FZD5 for signal specification. Similar data were obtained for FZD4 and FZD10 suggesting that our findings can be extrapolated to other members of the FZD family. Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of wild type and selected FZD5 mutants further support the concept that distinct conformational changes in FZDs specify the signal outcome. In conclusion, we find that FZD5 and FZDs in general prefer coupling to DVL rather than heterotrimeric G proteins and that distinct active state micro-switches in the receptor are essential for pathway selection arguing for conformational changes in the receptor protein defining transducer selectivity.

Serotonin 5-HT7 receptor slows down the Gs protein: a single molecule perspective.

The 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor type 7 (5-HT7R) is a G protein-coupled receptor present primarily in the nervous system and gastrointestinal tract, where it regulates mood, cognition, digestion, and vasoconstriction. 5-HT7R has previously been shown to bind to its cognate stimulatory Gs protein in the inactive state. This phenomenon, termed "inverse coupling," is thought to counteract the atypically high intrinsic activity of 5-HT7R. However, it is not clear how active and inactive 5-HT7 receptors affect the mobility of the Gs protein in the plasma membrane. Here, we used single-molecule imaging of the Gs protein and 5-HT7R to evaluate Gs mobility in the membrane in the presence of 5-HT7R and its mutants. We show that expression of 5-HT7R dramatically reduces the diffusion rate of Gs. Expression of the constitutively active mutant 5-HT7R (L173A) is less effective at slowing Gs diffusion presumably due to the reduced ability to form long-lasting inactive complexes. An inactive 5-HT7R (N380K) mutant slows down Gs to the same extent as the wild-type receptor. We conclude that inactive 5-HT7R profoundly affects Gs mobility, which could lead to Gs redistribution in the plasma membrane and alter its availability to other G protein-coupled receptors and effectors.

A Non-Systemic Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Suppresses Colon Proliferation in Mice.

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are under investigation for repurposing for colon cancer prevention. A drawback to conventional PDE5i are their side-effects and drug-drug interactions. We designed an analog of the prototypical PDE5i sildenafil by replacing the methyl group on the piperazine ring with malonic acid to reduce lipophilicity, and measured its entry into the circulation and effects on colon epithelium. This modification did not affect pharmacology as malonyl-sildenafil had a similar IC50 to sildenafil but exhibited an almost 20-fold reduced EC50 for increasing cellular cGMP. Using an LC-MS/MS approach, malonyl-sildenafil was negligible in mouse plasma after oral administration but was detected at high levels in the feces. No bioactive metabolites of malonyl-sildenafil were detected in the circulation by measuring interactions with isosorbide mononitrate. The treatment of mice with malonyl-sildenafil in the drinking water resulted in a suppression of proliferation in the colon epithelium that is consistent with results previously published for mice treated with PDE5i. A carboxylic-acid-containing analog of sildenafil prohibits the systemic delivery of the compound but maintains sufficient penetration into the colon epithelium to suppress proliferation. This highlights a novel approach to generating a first-in-class drug for colon cancer chemoprevention.

The role of G protein conformation in receptor-G protein selectivity.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) selectively activate at least one of the four families of heterotrimeric G proteins, but the mechanism of coupling selectivity remains unclear. Structural studies emphasize structural complementarity of GPCRs and nucleotide-free G proteins, but selectivity is likely to be determined by transient intermediate-state complexes that exist before nucleotide release. Here we study coupling to nucleotide-decoupled G protein variants that can adopt conformations similar to receptor-bound G proteins without releasing nucleotide, and are therefore able to bypass intermediate-state complexes. We find that selectivity is degraded when nucleotide release is not required for GPCR-G protein complex formation, to the extent that most GPCRs interact with most nucleotide-decoupled G proteins. These findings demonstrate the absence of absolute structural incompatibility between noncognate receptor-G protein pairs, and are consistent with the hypothesis that transient intermediate states are partly responsible for coupling selectivity.

Time- and cost-efficient bacterial expression and purification of potato apyrase.

Apyrase from potato (Solanum tuberosum) is a divalent metal ion-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of nucleoside di- and tri-phosphates with broad substrate specificity. The enzyme is widely used to manipulate nucleotide levels such as in the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) field where it is used to deplete guanine nucleotides to stabilize nucleotide-free ternary agonist-GPCR-G protein complexes. Potato apyrase is available commercially as the native enzyme purified from potatoes or as a recombinant protein, but these are prohibitively expensive for some research applications. Here, we report a relatively simple method for the bacterial production of soluble, active potato apyrase. Apyrase has several disulfide bonds, so we co-expressed the enzyme bearing a C-terminal (His)6 tag with the E. coli disulfide isomerase DsbC at low temperature (18 °C) in the oxidizing cytoplasm of E. coli Origami B (DE3). This allowed low level production of soluble apyrase. A two-step purification procedure involving Ni-affinity followed by Cibacron Blue-affinity chromatography yielded highly purified apyrase at a level of ∼0.5 mg per L of bacterial culture. The purified enzyme was functional for ATP hydrolysis in an ATPase assay and for GTP/GDP hydrolysis in a GPCR-G protein coupling assay. This methodology enables the time- and cost-efficient production of recombinant apyrase for various research applications.

Activation of a novel α2AAR-spinophilin-cofilin axis determines the effect of α2 adrenergic drugs on fear memory reconsolidation.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after the pandemic has emerged as a major neuropsychiatric component of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, yet the current pharmacotherapy for PTSD is limited. The use of adrenergic drugs to treat PTSD has been suggested; however, it is hindered by conflicting clinical results and a lack of mechanistic understanding of drug actions. Our studies, using both genetically modified mice and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons, reveal a novel α2A adrenergic receptor (α2AAR)-spinophilin-cofilin axis in the hippocampus that is critical for regulation of contextual fear memory reconsolidation. In addition, we have found that two α2 ligands, clonidine and guanfacine, exhibit differential abilities in activating this signaling axis to disrupt fear memory reconsolidation. Stimulation of α2AAR with clonidine, but not guanfacine, promotes the interaction of the actin binding protein cofilin with the receptor and with the dendritic spine scaffolding protein spinophilin to induce cofilin activation at the synapse. Spinophilin-dependent regulation of cofilin is required for clonidine-induced disruption of contextual fear memory reconsolidation. Our results inform the interpretation of differential clinical observations of these two drugs on PTSD and suggest that clonidine could provide immediate treatment for PTSD symptoms related to the current pandemic. Furthermore, our study indicates that modulation of dendritic spine morphology may represent an effective strategy for the development of new pharmacotherapies for PTSD.

S-nitrosylation is required for ß2AR desensitization and experimental asthma.

The ß2-adrenergic receptor (ß2AR), a prototypic G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), is a powerful driver of bronchorelaxation, but the effectiveness of ß-agonist drugs in asthma is limited by desensitization and tachyphylaxis. We find that during activation, the ß2AR is modified by S-nitrosylation, which is essential for both classic desensitization by PKA as well as desensitization of NO-based signaling that mediates bronchorelaxation. Strikingly, S-nitrosylation alone can drive ß2AR internalization in the absence of traditional agonist. Mutant ß2AR refractory to S-nitrosylation (Cys265Ser) exhibits reduced desensitization and internalization, thereby amplifying NO-based signaling, and mice with Cys265Ser mutation are resistant to bronchoconstriction, inflammation, and the development of asthma. S-nitrosylation is thus a central mechanism in ß2AR signaling that may be operative widely among GPCRs and targeted for therapeutic gain.

GPCR-mediated ß-arrestin activation deconvoluted with single-molecule precision.

ß-arrestins bind G protein-coupled receptors to terminate G protein signaling and to facilitate other downstream signaling pathways. Using single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging, we show that ß-arrestin is strongly autoinhibited in its basal state. Its engagement with a phosphopeptide mimicking phosphorylated receptor tail efficiently releases the ß-arrestin tail from its N domain to assume distinct conformations. Unexpectedly, we find that ß-arrestin binding to phosphorylated receptor, with a phosphorylation barcode identical to the isolated phosphopeptide, is highly inefficient and that agonist-promoted receptor activation is required for ß-arrestin activation, consistent with the release of a sequestered receptor C tail. These findings, together with focused cellular investigations, reveal that agonism and receptor C-tail release are specific determinants of the rate and efficiency of ß-arrestin activation by phosphorylated receptor. We infer that receptor phosphorylation patterns, in combination with receptor agonism, synergistically establish the strength and specificity with which diverse, downstream ß-arrestin-mediated events are directed.

BRET-based effector membrane translocation assay monitors GPCR-promoted and endocytosis-mediated Gq activation at early endosomes.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are gatekeepers of cellular homeostasis and the targets of a large proportion of drugs. In addition to their signaling activity at the plasma membrane, it has been proposed that their actions may result from translocation and activation of G proteins at endomembranes-namely endosomes. This could have a significant impact on our understanding of how signals from GPCR-targeting drugs are propagated within the cell. However, little is known about the mechanisms that drive G protein movement and activation in subcellular compartments. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based effector membrane translocation assays, we dissected the mechanisms underlying endosomal Gq trafficking and activity following activation of Gq-coupled receptors, including the angiotensin II type 1, bradykinin B2, oxytocin, thromboxane A2 alpha isoform, and muscarinic acetylcholine M3 receptors. Our data reveal that GPCR-promoted activation of Gq at the plasma membrane induces its translocation to endosomes independently of ß-arrestin engagement and receptor endocytosis. In contrast, Gq activity at endosomes was found to rely on both receptor endocytosis-dependent and -independent mechanisms. In addition to shedding light on the molecular processes controlling subcellular Gq signaling, our study provides a set of tools that will be generally applicable to the study of G protein translocation and activation at endosomes and other subcellular organelles, as well as the contribution of signal propagation to drug action.

Constitutive G protein coupling profiles of understudied orphan GPCRs.

A large number of GPCRs are potentially valuable drug targets but remain understudied. Many of these lack well-validated activating ligands and are considered "orphan" receptors, and G protein coupling profiles have not been defined for many orphan GPCRs. Here we asked if constitutive receptor activity can be used to determine G protein coupling profiles of orphan GPCRs. We monitored nucleotide-sensitive interactions between 48 understudied orphan GPCRs and five G proteins (240 combinations) using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). No receptor ligands were used, but GDP was used as a common G protein ligand to disrupt receptor-G protein complexes. Constitutive BRET between the same receptors and ß-arrestins was also measured. We found sufficient GDP-sensitive BRET to generate G protein coupling profiles for 22 of the 48 receptors we studied. Altogether we identified 48 coupled receptor-G protein pairs, many of which have not been described previously. We conclude that receptor-G protein complexes that form spontaneously in the absence of guanine nucleotides can be used to profile G protein coupling of constitutively-active GPCRs. This approach may prove useful for studying G protein coupling of other GPCRs for which activating ligands are not available.

Circulating Bile Acids in Liver Failure Activate TGR5 and Induce Monocyte Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Retention of bile acids in the blood is a hallmark of liver failure. Recent studies have shown that increased serum bile acid levels correlate with bacterial infection and increased mortality. However, the mechanisms by which circulating bile acids influence patient outcomes still are elusive. METHODS: Serum bile acid profiles in 33 critically ill patients with liver failure and their effects on Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), an immunomodulatory receptor that is highly expressed in monocytes, were analyzed using tandem mass spectrometry, novel highly sensitive TGR5 bioluminescence resonance energy transfer using nanoluciferase (NanoBRET, Promega Corp, Madison, WI) technology, and in vitro assays with human monocytes. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (67%) had serum bile acids that led to distinct TGR5 activation. These TGR5-activating serum bile acids severely compromised monocyte function. The release of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, tumor necrosis factor α or interleukin 6) in response to bacterial challenge was reduced significantly if monocytes were incubated with TGR5-activating serum bile acids from patients with liver failure. By contrast, serum bile acids from healthy volunteers did not influence cytokine release. Monocytes that did not express TGR5 were protected from the bile acid effects. TGR5-activating serum bile acids were a risk factor for a fatal outcome in patients with liver failure, independent of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on their composition and quantity, serum bile acids in liver failure activate TGR5. TGR5 activation leads to monocyte dysfunction and correlates with mortality, independent of disease activity. This indicates an active role of TGR5 in liver failure. Therefore, TGR5 and bile acid metabolism might be promising targets for the treatment of immune dysfunction in liver failure.

G protein ßγ translocation to the Golgi apparatus activates MAPK via p110γ-p101 heterodimers.

The Golgi apparatus (GA) is a cellular organelle that plays a critical role in the processing of proteins for secretion. Activation of G protein-coupled receptors at the plasma membrane (PM) induces the translocation of G protein ßγ dimers to the GA. However, the functional significance of this translocation is largely unknown. Here, we study PM-GA translocation of all 12 Gγ subunits in response to chemokine receptor CXCR4 activation and demonstrate that Gγ9 is a unique Golgi-translocating Gγ subunit. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of Gγ9 abolishes activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), two members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family, by CXCR4. We show that chemically induced recruitment to the GA of Gßγ dimers containing different Gγ subunits activates ERK1/2, whereas recruitment to the PM is ineffective. We also demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ (PI3Kγ) and depletion of its subunits p110γ and p101 abrogate ERK1/2 activation by CXCR4 and Gßγ recruitment to the GA. Knockout of either Gγ9 or PI3Kγ significantly suppresses prostate cancer PC3 cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Collectively, our data demonstrate a novel function for Gßγ translocation to the GA, via activating PI3Kγ heterodimers p110γ-p101, to spatiotemporally regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by G protein-coupled receptors and ultimately control tumor progression.

An inactive receptor-G protein complex maintains the dynamic range of agonist-induced signaling.

Agonist binding promotes activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and association of active receptors with G protein heterotrimers. The resulting active-state ternary complex is the basis for conventional stimulus-response coupling. Although GPCRs can also associate with G proteins before agonist binding, the impact of such preassociated complexes on agonist-induced signaling is poorly understood. Here we show that preassociation of 5-HT7 serotonin receptors with Gs heterotrimers is necessary for agonist-induced signaling. 5-HT7 receptors in their inactive state associate with Gs, as these complexes are stabilized by inverse agonists and receptor mutations that favor the inactive state. Inactive-state 5-HT7-Gs complexes dissociate in response to agonists, allowing the formation of conventional agonist-5-HT7-Gs ternary complexes and subsequent Gs activation. Inactive-state 5-HT7-Gs complexes are required for the full dynamic range of agonist-induced signaling, as 5-HT7 receptors spontaneously activate Gs variants that cannot form inactive-state complexes. Therefore, agonist-induced signaling in this system involves two distinct receptor-G protein complexes, a conventional ternary complex that activates G proteins and an inverse-coupled binary complex that maintains the inactive state when agonist is not present.

Agonist-induced formation of unproductive receptor-G12 complexes.

G proteins are activated when they associate with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), often in response to agonist-mediated receptor activation. It is generally thought that agonist-induced receptor-G protein association necessarily promotes G protein activation and, conversely, that activated GPCRs do not interact with G proteins that they do not activate. Here we show that GPCRs can form agonist-dependent complexes with G proteins that they do not activate. Using cell-based bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and luminescence assays we find that vasopressin V2 receptors (V2R) associate with both Gs and G12 heterotrimers when stimulated with the agonist arginine vasopressin (AVP). However, unlike V2R-Gs complexes, V2R-G12 complexes are not destabilized by guanine nucleotides and do not promote G12 activation. Activating V2R does not lead to signaling responses downstream of G12 activation, but instead inhibits basal G12-mediated signaling, presumably by sequestering G12 heterotrimers. Overexpressing G12 inhibits G protein receptor kinase (GRK) and arrestin recruitment to V2R and receptor internalization. Formyl peptide (FPR1 and FPR2) and Smoothened (Smo) receptors also form complexes with G12 that are insensitive to nucleotides, suggesting that unproductive GPCR-G12 complexes are not unique to V2R. These results indicate that agonist-dependent receptor-G protein association does not always lead to G protein activation and may in fact inhibit G protein activation.

Publisher Correction: G12/13 is activated by acute tethered agonist exposure in the adhesion GPCR ADGRL3.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

G12/13 is activated by acute tethered agonist exposure in the adhesion GPCR ADGRL3.

The adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) latrophilin 3 (ADGRL3) has been associated with increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and substance use in human genetic studies. Knockdown in multiple species leads to hyperlocomotion and altered dopamine signaling. Thus, ADGRL3 is a potential target for treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders that involve dopamine dysfunction, but its basic signaling properties are poorly understood. Identification of adhesion GPCR signaling partners has been limited by a lack of tools to acutely activate these receptors in living cells. Here, we design a novel acute activation strategy to characterize ADGRL3 signaling by engineering a receptor construct in which we could trigger acute activation enzymatically. Using this assay, we found that ADGRL3 signals through G12/G13 and Gq, with G12/13 the most robustly activated. Gα12/13 is a new player in ADGRL3 biology, opening up unexplored roles for ADGRL3 in the brain. Our methodological advancements should be broadly useful in adhesion GPCR research.