Alcoholism, depression, and abnormal cognition in head and neck cancer: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of alcohol abuse and dependency, depression, and cognitive impairment in presurgical head and neck cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: Standardized testing by diagnostic interview was used to determine major depression and alcoholism. Mattis Dementia Rating Scale examined cognitive ability preoperatively. Twenty-four patients with advanced head and neck cancer participated. SETTING: University hospital. RESULTS: A total of 63.6% met criteria for alcohol abuse and 62 percent for alcohol dependence; 26.1 % of patients met criteria for major depression. Testing in multiple subsets of cognitive function demonstrated measurable deficits in both alcohol dependents and abusers. All deficits were significant when compared with population norms. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that prevalence of alcohol abuse, major depression, and cognitive impairment is common in head and neck cancer patients preoperatively. Early diagnosis and management of these disorders should be considered in care of the head and neck cancer patient.

Relation of family history of prostate cancer to perceived vulnerability and screening behavior.

Men with a positive family history of prostate cancer are known to be at increased risk for the disease; however, relatively little is known about their risk perceptions or screening behavior. To address these issues, the current study examined the relationship of family history of prostate cancer to perceived vulnerability of developing prostate cancer and prostate cancer screening practices. Participants were 83 men with a positive family history of prostate cancer and 83 men with a negative family history of prostate cancer. As predicted, men with a positive family history reported greater (p< or =0.05) perceived vulnerability of developing prostate cancer and stronger intentions to undergo screening (p< or =0.05). They also reported greater past performance of prostate-specific antigen screening and were more likely to request information about prostate cancer (p< or =0.05). Additional analyses indicated that perceived vulnerability mediated the relation between family history and intentions to undergo prostate cancer screening. Findings confirm the increased likelihood of men with a positive family history to undergo prostate cancer screening and suggest that heightened concerns about developing the disease are an important motivating factor.

Predictors of depression and life satisfaction among spousal caregivers in hospice: application of a stress process model.

Using a stress process model, risk factors (caregiving stressors, caregiver health, and negative social interactions) and protective factors (caregiving appraisals and social resources) were examined as predictors of family caregiver well-being (depression and life satisfaction). Eighty spousal caregivers of hospice patients with dementia or lung cancer completed structured interviews and self-report measures assessing components of the stress process model. Results suggest that objective measures of patient impairment or amount of care provided are not strong predictors of caregiver depression or life satisfaction. Female gender, caregiver health problems, and negative social interactions were risk factors for poorer caregiver well-being. Caregivers who subjectively appraised caregiving tasks as less stressful, who found meaning and subjective benefits from caregiving, and with more social resources had lower depression and higher life satisfaction, even after controlling for patient impairment and caregiver appraisal variables. Regression models accounted for 42% of variance in caregiver depression and 52% of variance in caregiver life satisfaction. Counseling for hospice family caregivers could utilize the stress process framework, and pay particular attention to finding meaning or subjective benefits from caregiving, and remaining active in social roles. Further research providing evidence on caregiver risk and protective factors could improve the conceptual and empirical basis for psychosocial interventions for hospice family caregivers.