Association of Membership at a Medical Fitness Facility With Adverse Health Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Interventions that increase physical activity behavior can reduce morbidity and prolong life, but long-term effects in large populations are unproven. This study investigates the association of medical fitness facility membership and frequency of attendance with all-cause mortality and rate of hospitalization. METHODS: A propensity weighted retrospective cohort study was conducted by linking individuals who attended medical fitness facilities in Winnipeg, Canada to provincial health administrative databases. Members aged ≥18 years who had ≥1 year of provincial health coverage from their index date between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015 were included. Controls were assigned a pseudo-index date at random on the basis of the frequency distribution of index dates in the intervention group. Members were stratified into low-frequency attenders (<1 weekly visit), moderate-frequency attenders (1-3 weekly visits), and high-frequency attenders (>3 weekly visits). The primary outcomes were time to all-cause mortality and rate of hospitalizations. Statistical analyses were performed between 2018 and 2020. RESULTS: Among 19,300 adult members and 515,810 controls, members had a 60% lower risk of all-cause mortality during the first 651 days and 48% after 651 days. Membership was associated with a 13% lower risk of hospitalizations. A dose-response effect was apparent because higher weekly attendance was associated with a lower risk of hospitalizations (low frequency: 9%, moderate frequency: 20%, high frequency: 39%). CONCLUSIONS: Membership at a medical fitness facility was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalizations. Healthcare systems should consider the medical fitness model as a preventative public health strategy to encourage physical activity participation.

Examining Patient Outcome Quality Indicators Based on Wait Time From Referral to Entry Into Cardiac Rehabilitation: A PILOT OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether meeting the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) ≤60-day wait time from cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral to enrollment is associated with CCS patient-level quality indicator outcomes. METHODS: This pilot observational study consisted of 69 participants entering CR separated into 2 groups based on wait time (≤60-day, n = 45; >60-day, n = 24). Data were collected at baseline, and 1, 4 (CR completion), 6, and 12 months after baseline. Quality indicators for achieving a 0.5 peak metabolic equivalent (MET) improvement at CR completion, physical activity of 150 min/wk of moderate-vigorous physical activity, and CR adherence were assessed. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty participants completed the study (≤60-day, n = 40; >60-day, n = 20). In the ≤60-day group, 92% of participants achieved the 0.5 MET improvement upon CR completion; whereas 60% of the >60-day group met this criteria (P ≤ .05). For the 150 min/wk of moderate-vigorous physical activity and CR adherence, both groups were not significantly different at any time. Elevated depressive symptoms were initially observed in 45% of participants in the ≤60-day group and 35% in the >60-day group (NS) and decreased to 8% in the ≤60-day group compared with 30% in the >60-day group at 12 months (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Meeting the CCS 60-day acceptable wait time is associated with improvements in METs and depressive symptoms, but not with physical activity or CR adherence. A larger observational study is warranted to explore patient-level CCS quality indicators during and after CR.

Prehabilitation program for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients: a pilot randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a cardiac prehabilitation (Prehab) program for patients waiting for elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). DESIGN: A two-group parallel randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Medical fitness facility. SUBJECTS: Seventeen preoperative elective CABG surgery patients were randomized to standard care (n = 9) or Prehab (n = 8). INTERVENTION: Standard care: three-hour preassessment appointment. Prehab: exercise and education classes for 60 minutes/day, twice weekly for at least four weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Data were collected at baseline, one week preoperatively, and three months postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was walking distance using a 6-minute walk test. Secondary outcome variables included 5-meter gait speed, and cardiac rehabilitation attendance three months postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (standard care, n = 7; Prehab, n = 8) completed the study. No Prehab patients developed cardiac symptoms during study participation. Walking distance remained unchanged in the standard care group; whereas, the Prehab group increased their walking distance to mean ± SD 474 ±101 and 487 ±106 m at the preoperative and three month postoperative assessments (p < 0.05). Gait speed was unchanged in the standard care group, but improved in the Prehab group by 27% and 33% preoperatively and three months postoperatively, respectively (p < 0.05). Enrollment in cardiac rehabilitation three months postoperatively was higher for Prehab participants (100%) than standard care participants (43%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence for the feasibility of a Prehab intervention to improve the health status of patients waiting for elective CABG surgery. A larger trial of 92 patients will be utilized to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Prehab.