Adherence to Established Blood Pressure Targets and Associated Complications in Patients Presenting with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists surrounding systolic blood pressure (SBP) control in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The 2022 American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guidelines recommend targeting a SBP of 140 mm Hg while maintaining the range of 130-150 mm Hg. The current practice at our health system is to titrate antihypertensives to a SBP goal of < 160 mm Hg, which aligns with previous recommendations. We hypothesized that the prior lack of guidance to a specific SBP target range predisposed patients to hypotension leading to an increased risk of brain and renal adverse events. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, single health system cohort study included adults admitted to the neurointensive care unit or intermediate unit with acute ICH from June 2019 to June 2021. The primary objective evaluated the frequency of time within SBP range (140-160 mm Hg) in the first 48 h. Secondary and safety end points included the frequency of time above and below the established SBP range, episodes of hypotension (defined as a decrease in SBP < 140 mm Hg prompting discontinuation in antihypertensive[s] or the initiation of vasopressor[s]), the incidence of new brain or renal adverse events within 7 days, and modified Rankin Scale at discharge. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (59% men; median age 62 years) were included. The majority of ICHs in this cohort were intraparenchymal (70%). Nearly one third were attributed to systemic hypertension (31%). During the first 48 h of admission, the frequency of time spent above, within, and below the target SBP range were 6 h (12%), 16 h (34%), and 26 h (54%), respectively. Hypotension was associated with renal adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-11.44, p = 0.023). A relative SBP reduction > 20% in the first 48 h was associated with renal adverse events (OR 8.99, 95% CI 2.57-35.25, p < 0.001), brain ischemia (OR 22.5, 95% CI 1.92-300.11, p = 0.005), and an increased odd of a modified Rankin Scale of 4-6 at discharge (OR 11.79, 95% CI 2.79-57.02, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with nontraumatic/nonaneurysmal ICH, SBP measurements were observed to be < 140 mm Hg for > 50% of the initial 48 h following admission. Hypotension and relative SBP reduction > 20% were also independent predictors of renal adverse events. SBP reduction > 20% was also an independent predictor of brain ischemia. These data indicate that intensive SBP reduction following ICH predispose patients to secondary organ injury that may impact long-term outcomes. Our data suggest that a more modest lowering of the SBP within 48 h, as recommended in the most recent guidelines, may minimize the risk of further adverse events.

Perioperative glucocorticoid prescribing habits in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a call for standardization.

IMPORTANCE: High-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) are routinely given to surgical patients with a history of GC exposure to prevent perioperative acute adrenal insufficiency, but this practice is not well supported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability of perioperative GC dosing among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing major abdominal surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective study of 49 patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery at a single institution between July 2010 and August 2011. Data on patient comorbidities, intraoperative risk factors, surgical site infections, and 30-day readmission rates were prospectively collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Preoperative GC exposure at the time of the index admission and perioperative GC therapy during admission were collected by review of the medical records. Patients were divided into 3 groups at the time of surgery: (1) 1 week or more of prior GC exposure, not receiving maintenance therapy (n = 15); (2) currently receiving budesonide (n = 10); and (3) currently receiving oral prednisone (n = 24). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Perioperative GC exposure was the main outcome. Qualitative comparisons of perioperative exposure stratified by preoperative GC exposure were done. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant differences in surgical site infection and 30-day readmission rates among patients with and without perioperative GC exposure. RESULTS: Overall, 38 of 49 patients (78%) received perioperative GCs; intraoperative GCs were administered to 35 of 49 patients (71%), and 33 of 49 patients (67%) received postoperative GCs. Patients received intraoperative and postoperative GCs, respectively, as follows: 8 patients (53%) and 7 (47%) in group 1, 7 (70%) and 3 (30%) in group 2, and 20 (83%) and 23 (96%) in group 3. The median intraoperative GC dose was 100 mg (range, 50-267 mg of hydrocortisone or hydrocortisone equivalent for dexamethasone); the median total postoperative GC dose for the first 5 days after surgery was 485 mg (range, 50-890 mg of hydrocortisone or hydrocortisone equivalent for prednisone). The median duration of postoperative GC administration was 3 days for group 1, 6 days for group 2, and 7 days for group 3. No statistically significant difference in surgical site infection and 30-day readmission rates was detected in the GC exposure vs no-exposure groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Perioperative GC dosing among patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery is highly variable even within a single center. Additional studies are needed to define the risk of postoperative adrenal insufficiency and establish standardized practices for perioperative GC therapy, which may have the benefit of reducing GC overuse.