Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Sci Med Sport ; 27(4): 257-265, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267294

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To synthesise and evaluate the quality of the recommendations for exercise therapy and physical activity from guidelines for the prevention and/or management of low back pain. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Included clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain published between 2014 and 2022 and searched in 9 databases until September 2022. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation tool (AGREE-II instrument). RESULTS: After screening 3448 studies, 18 clinical practice guidelines were included in this review. Only five (27 %) guidelines were judged as having a satisfactory quality of evidence (i.e., rigour of development and applicability), and 13 (72 %) of guidelines are discussed and rated as critical. Regarding physical activity, no guidelines provided recommendations for the primary prevention of low back pain or incorporated adequate physical activity aspects considering type, dosage, frequency, and intensity. For exercises, all (100 %) guidelines recommended at least one type of supervised exercise in the management of low back pain, and 16 (88 %) provided an overall recommendation for people to stay active. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines offer minimal or, sometimes, no detail regarding physical activity or specific exercise regimens for the management and prevention of low back pain. When some guidance is provided, the recommendations typically lack specificity concerning the type, intensity, duration, and frequency of exercise and, in many cases, they represent a combination of scarce available evidence and stakeholder perspectives.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Humans , Low Back Pain/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy , Exercise
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 294: 180-190, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286038

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the association between musculoskeletal pain during pregnancy and birth outcomes including caesarean section, newborn birthweight, newborn birth length, and gestational age at birth. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cinahl and Scopus were systematically searched to identify eligible studies. Odds ratios, mean differences, and confidence intervals were used to describe results. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. GRADE (The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to assess the quality of each outcome. RESULTS: Seven studies were included with a total population of 85,991 participants. There is low- quality evidence that pregnant women with musculoskeletal pain had 1.59 greater odds to experience delivery by caesarean section compared to those without musculoskeletal pain ([OR] 1.59, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 2.31). Both newborn birth weight (Mean Difference [MD] 77.79 g, 95 % [CI] -23.09 to 178.67) and newborn birth length ([MD] 0.55 cm, 95 % [CI] -0.47 to 1.56) were not affected by musculoskeletal pain, with very low-quality and low-quality evidence, respectively. There was moderate evidence that pregnant women with musculoskeletal pain had shorter gestational age (weeks), although the effect was small and possibly not clinically relevant ([MD] -0.41, 95 % [CI] -0.41 to -0.07). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women experiencing musculoskeletal pain are at greater odds of delivering their babies via caesarean than those without musculoskeletal pain, however, musculoskeletal pain during pregnancy does not appear to affect newborn birth weight, length, or gestational age at birth.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Musculoskeletal Pain , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Birth Weight , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Gestational Age , Pregnancy Outcome
3.
Sleep Med Rev ; 65: 101672, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36087458

ABSTRACT

Chronic low back pain (LBP) shares a bidirectional relationship with sleep disturbance. Analgesics are often used for chronic LBP management however, the effects on sleep have not been thoroughly reviewed. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effect of opioid and non-opioid medications on sleep in people with chronic LBP. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials which resulted in 16 eligible articles (14 studies). Sleep measures were secondary outcomes, with one study assessing sleep objectively and all other studies reporting subjective sleep. Twelve studies assessed opioid therapies whilst two studies examined non-opioid therapies. Eight studies (all opioid) were included in meta-analyses of sleep quality and sleep disturbance comparing opioid therapies with placebo-controls. Opioid therapies significantly improved sleep quality (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17-0.36) and reduced sleep disturbance (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.25-0.40) compared to placebo-control. These findings show a clear improvement in subjective sleep associated with opioid therapies however, future studies should examine objective sleep outcomes which remain largely unexplored in chronic LBP. Addressing both pain and sleep together is important for effective management of comorbid conditions of chronic LBP and sleep disturbance due to their bidirectional relationship.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Low Back Pain , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Humans , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sleep
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...