Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Chin Med J (Engl) ; 121(2): 166-71, 2008 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18272045

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rosiglitazone is known as the most potent and specific peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) ligand. It has potentially far-reaching effects on pathophysiological processes, from cancer to atherosclerosis and diabetes. However, it is not clear whether rosiglitazone affects the protein expression of transforming growth factor beta3 (TGF-beta3) and the cell proliferation in human uterine leiomyoma cells in vitro. METHODS: Human uterine leiomyoma tissues were dissected and cultured. Cells were divided into 5 groups: one control group and other four groups with different concentrations of rosiglitazone (10(-7), 10(-8), 10(-9) and 10(-10) mol/L). Cells were cultured for 72 hours in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. MTT reduction assay was used to detect the cell proliferation. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to detect the mRNA expression of PPAR-gamma and TGF-beta3. Immunofluorescence staining was used to detect the expressions of PPAR-gamma and TGF-beta3 proteins. RESULTS: MTT reduction assay indicated that the treatment with rosiglitazone (from 10(-7) to 10(-9) mol/L) resulted in an inhibition of the cell growths after 72 hours (P < 0.01). RT-PCR analysis revealed that 10(-7) mol/L rosiglitazone significantly affected the gene expression at 72-hour: PPAR-gamma mRNA expression was up-regulated and TGF-beta3 mRNA was down-regulated and rosiglitazone at the concentration of 10(-7) mol/L affected these most effectively (P < 0.01). Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that treatment with 10(-7) mol/L rosiglitazone resulted in the significant changes of PPAR-gamma and TGF-beta3 protein expressions compared with the other treatment groups and the control group at 72-hour (P < 0.01). All the effects of rosiglitazone on uterine leiomyoma cells were dose- and time-dependent in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the PPAR-gamma activator, rosiglitazone, inhibits the cell proliferation partly through the regulations of PPAR-gamma and TGF-beta3 expressions. The cross-talk between the signal pathways of PPAR-gamma and TGF-beta3 may be involved in the process.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Leiomyoma/drug therapy , PPAR gamma/agonists , Thiazolidinediones/pharmacology , Transforming Growth Factor beta3/genetics , Uterine Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Female , Humans , Leiomyoma/pathology , PPAR gamma/analysis , PPAR gamma/genetics , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Rosiglitazone , Transforming Growth Factor beta3/analysis , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology
2.
Ai Zheng ; 23(8): 963-7, 2004 Aug.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15301725

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), and lung resistant protein (LRP) play important roles in multidrug resistance (MDR). This study was to determine P-gp, MRP, and LRP expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of stage III, and evaluate their predictive value in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analyses were performed on 31 patients with NSCLC of stage III before, and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: The frequency of P-gp, MRP, and LRP expression were 29.0% (9/31), 45.2% (14/31), and 38.7% (12/31) before chemotherapy, and were 61.3% (19/31), 51.6% (16/31), and 41.9% (13/31) after chemotherapy. Of 31 patients, 10 (10/31, 32.3%) expressed both MRP and LRP before chemotherapy, which indicated significant positive correlation between MRP and LRP expression (r=0.061, P< 0.001). In patients with P-gp, MRP, or LRP expression before chemotherapy, the response rates towards chemotherapy were 44.4% (4/9), 28.6% (4/14), and 16.7% (2/12). Of 10 patients with both MRP and LRP expression, only 1 (1/10, 10.0%) responded to chemotherapy. The median survival time of patients who responded to chemotherapy was 31 months, while that of patients who did not responded to chemotherapy was 15 months, that of patients who didn't receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery was 18 months. CONCLUSION: Patients with both MRP and LRP expression are probably resistant to chemotherapy, the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is limit in such patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Drug Resistance, Multiple/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Vault Ribonucleoprotein Particles/metabolism , Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Survival Rate , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinorelbine , Gemcitabine
3.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 38(9): 552-5, 2003 Sep.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14680611

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of high dose mifepristone and high dose progesterone in the treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma and to explore the possible mechanisms associating with them. METHODS: Thirty untreated patients diagnosed as endometrial carcinoma through dilation and curettage of the uteri were divided into 3 groups at random. Each group was given medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), (500 mg/day) or mifepristone (MIF), (100 mg/day) or MIF (100 mg/day) + MPA (500 mg/day) for 5 days respectively. On the sixth day, hysterectomy was performed on these patients. The endometrial cancer specimen of post-hysterectomy was compared with the one of pre-administrating. The morphologic changes of the endometrial cancer cells were observed through light microscope. Immunohistochemistry assay (SP method) was applied to determine the localization and immunoreactive intensity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), B-cell leukemia lymphoma-2 (bcl-2), bcl-2 associated X protein (bax) and CD(44v6). RESULTS: Better differentiation degree and active excretion were observed in all of the post-hysterectomy endometrial specimen. In the same time, apoptosis of carcinoma cells was observed. The most significant changes were seen in the MIF + MPA group. In the MPA group, the pre-treatment and post-treatment expression of PR (2.9 +/- 1.1, 1.6 +/- 0.8), ER (2.8 +/- 0.9, 1.4 +/- 0.9), PCNA (0.84 +/- 0.10, 0.60 +/- 0.12), bcl-2 (0.236 +/- 0.089, 0.157 +/- 0.981) and CD(44v6) (4.6 +/- 1.8, 2.5 +/- 1.9) were all decreased (all P < 0.01); the expression of bax (0.20 +/- 0.10, 0.42 +/- 0.07) was increased (P < 0.01). In the MIF group, the expression of PR (3.4 +/- 1.0, 1.9 +/- 0.8), ER (2.7 +/- 0.9, 1.2 +/- 0.7), PCNA (0.80 +/- 0.15, 0.65 +/- 0.10), bcl-2 (0.214 +/- 0.097, 0.121 +/- 0.073) were all decreased (all P < 0.01); the expression of bax (0.21 +/- 0.05, 0.44 +/- 0.09) was increased (P < 0.01); no significant change in the expression of CD(44v6) (4.2 +/- 2.0, 4.3 +/- 1.7) was seen (P > 0.05). In the MIF + MPA group, the expression of PR (3.2 +/- 1.0, 0.8 +/- 0.8), ER (2.7 +/- 0.9, 0.7 +/- 0.9), PCNA (0.81 +/- 0.09, 0.25 +/- 0.09), bcl-2 (0.225 +/- 0.091, 0.066 +/- 0.009) and CD(44v6) (4.5 +/- 1.9, 2.7 +/- 1.6) were all decreased (all P < 0.01); the expression of bax (0.22 +/- 0.06, 0.59 +/- 0.09) was increased (P < 0.01); there were significant different expression of PCNA, ER, PR, bax and bcl-2 as compared with the MIF group and the MPA group, respectively (all P < 0.01). The expression of CD(44v6) was significantly different (P < 0.01) between the MIF + MPA group, and the MIF group, but not significantly different between the MIF + MPA group and the MPA group. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that high dose progesterone could inhibit the growth, promote apoptosis and inhibit metastasis of endometrial carcinoma, MIF could inhibit the growth and promote apoptosis, MIF + MPA could more strongly inhibit the growth, promote apoptosis and inhibit metastasis of endometrial carcinoma than MIF or MPA, and synergistic effect was observed on the expression of PCNA, ER, PR, bax and bcl-2.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mifepristone/administration & dosage , Progesterone/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endometrial Neoplasms/chemistry , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Glycoproteins/analysis , Humans , Hyaluronan Receptors/analysis , Middle Aged , Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...