Abciximab, ticlopidine, and concomitant abciximab-ticlopidine therapy: ex vivo platelet aggregation inhibition profiles in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: We examined the ex vivo platelet aggregation profiles of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received either abciximab, ticlopidine, or both agents. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The trial was a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center, open-label study of 42 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who received the following regimens: group 1, abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus and 12-hour, 0.125 microg/kg per minute infusion); group 2, ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily for 14 consecutive days, initiated 12 to 18 hours before intervention); group 3, abciximab plus ticlopidine initiated 12 to 18 hours before procedure; and group 4, abciximab plus ticlopidine initiated 72 to 96 hours before procedure. Platelet aggregation measurements to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and a thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP, 8 micromol/L) were obtained before ticlopidine treatment, after initiation of ticlopidine, and immediately before abciximab treatment and intervention, then at several time periods after onset of abciximab treatment. Platelet surface abciximab levels were monitored by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Neither ticlopidine regimen resulted in appreciable platelet inhibition before intervention and before administration of abciximab. In the ticlopidine-only arm, suppression of platelet aggregation to the weakest stimuli (5 micromol/L ADP; 23% +/- 7.5%) was detected within 24 hours after intervention, with maximal inhibition to both 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP observed 7 days after intervention (48% +/- 7.9% and 18% +/- 8.7%, respectively). In contrast, ticlopidine marginally suppressed TRAP-mediated platelet activation at times when maximal effects on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation were evident. Neither ticlopidine regimen appreciably enhanced platelet inhibition during or shortly after cessation of abciximab treatment. For all 3 abciximab treatment arms, profound inhibition of ADP-induced (>80%) and TRAP-induced (>65%) platelet aggregation was observed 2 hours after treatment. In the abciximab-only arm, platelet aggregation responses gradually recovered, with the rate of response directly proportional to the strength of stimuli. However, in the ticlopidine plus abciximab arms, recovery of platelet aggregation at later times (7 and 14 days) reached a plateau and reflected the extent of inhibition observed in ticlopidine-treated patients. No difference in the clearance of surface-bound abciximab from circulating platelets was observed between the abciximab and abciximab plus ticlopidine arms. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant abciximab plus ticlopidine treatment yields a platelet inhibition profile that is a composite of the effects of the 2 agents. In the early stages of treatment, inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation was mediated primarily by abciximab; effects were more moderate and were predominately mediated by ticlopidine.

Ticlopidine enhances the platelet inhibitory capacity of abciximab in vitro.

Ticlopidine and abciximab are two antiplatelet agents that are frequently administered during percutaneous coronary interventions. Although they have different mechanisms of action and pharmacological profiles, the two agents are often concomitantly used in complicated stent placements. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of ticlopidine therapy on the capacity of abciximab to inhibit platelet aggregation, in vitro. Blood samples from 13 ticlopidine-treated stent placement patients and 8 patients undergoing PTCA who did not receive ticlopidine were obtained prior to, 12-36 hours and 7-10 days after initiating ticlopidine treatment. For each patient, the minimal ADP and the thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) concentrations that elicited maximal platelet aggregation responses at baseline were used to measure the extent of platelet aggregation and the abciximab concentration that gave a 50% decrease in aggregation (IC(50)) for both agonists at the three time points. The ticlopidine group baseline and 12-36 hour mean ADP aggregation responses were equivalent, but decreased by 34% (P = 0.009) at 7-10 days. The control group ADP and TRAP, as well as the ticlopidine group TRAP aggregation responses, were equivalent at all time points. The ticlopidine group baseline and 12-36 hour abciximab IC(50) values for ADP were comparable (1.58 +/- 1.1 ng/mL vs. 1.23 +/- 0.5 ng/mL; P = 0.266), but decreased to 1.00 +/- 0.6 ng/mL (36%; P = 0.004) at 7-10 days. In contrast, the abciximab IC(50) for TRAP increased from 1.48 +/- 1.0 ng/mL to 1.85 +/- 1.1 ng/mL (25%; P = 0.033) at 12-36 hours, but returned to baseline at 7-10 days (1.40 +/- 0.8; P = 0.975). The control group IC(50) abciximab values for ADP and TRAP were comparable throughout the monitoring period. The results demonstrate that ticlopidine elicits subtle potentiation of the platelet-inhibitory capacity of abciximab to the agonist ADP, but not TRAP, at 1 week after initiation of treatment.

Pharmacodynamic profile of short-term abciximab treatment demonstrates prolonged platelet inhibition with gradual recovery from GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade.

BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab is approved for use in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. The purpose of the present study was to establish the pharmacodynamic profile and platelet-bound life span of abciximab. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pharmacodynamics of abciximab (inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation and GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade) were measured in 41 individuals who were randomized to receive a 0.25-mg/kg bolus and a 12-hour infusion of either 10 microg/min (EPIC regimen) or 0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (EPILOG regimen) of the antiplatelet agent. At extended times, the amount and distribution of platelet-bound abciximab were monitored by flow cytometry. The EPIC and EPILOG infusion regimens exhibited equivalent blockade of both GP IIb/IIIa receptors and platelet aggregation throughout the duration of abciximab treatment. Flow cytometry revealed a single, highly fluorescent platelet population during treatment, consistent with complete saturation and homogeneous distribution of abciximab on circulating platelets. For 15 days after treatment, the fluorescence histograms remained unimodal with gradually diminishing fluorescence intensity, indicating decreasing levels of platelet-bound abciximab. At 8 and 15 days, which exceeds the normal circulating life span of platelets, median relative fluorescence intensity corresponded to 29100 (29% GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade) and 13300 (13% GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade) abciximab molecules bound per platelet, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with continuous reequilibration of abciximab among circulating platelets and may explain the gradual recovery of platelet function and long-term prevention of ischemic complications by abciximab after coronary intervention.

Rapid assessment of platelet function with a modified whole-blood aggregometer in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty patients receiving anti-GP IIb/IIIa therapy.

BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab (c7E3 Fab, ReoPro) is approved for use in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). At present, no "point of care" exists for measuring pharmacological GP IIb/IIIa blockade. To address this need, the Chrono-log Whole Blood Aggregometer, which measures platelet aggregation by electrical impedance, was adapted to test platelet function at the bedside. METHODS AND RESULTS: GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade, impedance (5 microg/mL collagen), and turbidimetric aggregation (5 and 20 micromol/L ADP) measurements were obtained on 14 PTCA patients who received the standard bolus plus a 12-hour infusion of abciximab. During abciximab administration, mean GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade was > 91%, and both impedance and turbidimetric aggregation were inhibited by > or = 90%. At 12 hours after abciximab treatment, the mean inhibition of turbidimetric platelet aggregation to 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP was 65+/-20% and 49+/-14%, respectively, and inhibition of impedance aggregation was 69+/-12%. GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade was 67+/-8%. At 36 hours after abciximab treatment (n=8), the mean inhibition of turbidimetric platelet aggregation to 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP was 44+/-21% and 30+/-14%, respectively, whereas impedance aggregation was inhibited by 60+/-14%. GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade was 57+/-7%. CONCLUSIONS: During and at 12 hours after abciximab therapy, impedance and turbidimetric platelet aggregation to 5 micromol/L ADP were comparable and closely correlated with GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. However, at 36 hours after abciximab treatment, impedance platelet aggregation more closely paralleled GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and indicated a slower recovery of platelet function than turbidimetric aggregometry.