The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people living with HIV: a cross-sectional study in Caracas, Venezuela.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted multiple health services, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing, care, and treatment services, jeopardizing the achievement of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 90-90-90 global target. While there are limited studies assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Latin America, there are none, to our knowledge, in Venezuela. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among PLHIV seen at the outpatient clinic of a reference hospital in Venezuela. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among PLHIV aged 18 years and over seen at the Infectious Diseases Department of the University Hospital of Caracas, Venezuela between March 2021 and February 2022. RESULTS: A total of 238 PLHIV were included in the study. The median age was 43 (IQR 31-55) years, and the majority were male (68.9%). Most patients (88.2%, n = 210) came for routine check-ups, while 28 (11.3%) were newly diagnosed. The majority of patients (96.1%) were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), but only 67.8% had a viral load test, with almost all (95.6%) being undetectable. Among those who attended regular appointments, 11.9% reported missing at least one medical consultation, and 3.3% reported an interruption in their ART refill. More than half of the patients (55.5%) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, while the rest expressed hesitancy to get vaccinated. Most patients with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were male (65.1%), younger than 44 years (57.5%), employed (47.2%), and had been diagnosed with HIV for less than one year (33%). However, no statistically significant differences were found between vaccinated patients and those with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Older age was a risk factor for missing consultations, while not having an alcoholic habit was identified as a protective factor against missing consultations. CONCLUSION: This study found that the COVID-19 pandemic had a limited impact on adherence to medical consultations and interruptions in ART among PLHIV seen at the University Hospital of Caracas, Venezuela.

Caracterización clínico-epidemiológica de endocarditis infecciosa en pediatría

La endocarditis infecciosa es un proceso inflamatorio infeccioso causado por distintos microorganismos afectando el endocardio. Es una entidad poco frecuente en niños previamente sanos; no obstante, no es rara su ocurrencia en niños con ciertas cardiopatías congénitas; encontrándose un aumento en la incidencia en los extremos de las edades pediátricas. Objetivo: Describir las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes pediátricos hospitalizados en el Hospital Universitario de Caracas, durante el período comprendido entre enero 2001 a diciembre 2020. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo, utilizando como criterio de inclusión todo paciente pediátrico entre 0-12 años que ingresa con el diagnóstico de endocarditis infecciosa. Se recolectaron datos como edad, sexo, nivel socioeconómico, comorbilidades, factores predisponentes, hallazgos clínicos, paraclínicos, ecocardiográficos y terapéutica indicada; analizándose con estadística descriptiva, con el fin de establecer tablas de distribución de frecuencias. Resultados: Se incluyeron 17 pacientes en el estudio; el género masculino, los recién nacidos y preescolares fueron los que desarrollaron mayormente esta patología, observándose una supervivencia del 70,8 %. El principal factor predisponente para su desarrollo fue la presencia de catéter venoso central. En el 42,9 % de los hemocultivos se aisló Candida spp. Conclusión: En endocarditis infecciosa, a pesar de su baja incidencia, las complicaciones y mortalidad pueden ser altas; por lo cual ante todo paciente portador de catéter venoso central, con clínica de fiebre, taquicardia y soplo cardíaco, con hallazgos paraclínicos de leucocitosis, anemia y elevación de reactantes de fase aguda se sugiere el descarte de la misma.

Infective endocarditis is an infectious inflammatory process caused by different microorganisms affecting the endocardium. It is a rare entity in previously healthy children; however, its occurrence in children with certain congenital heart diseases is not uncommon; finding an increase in incidence at the extremes of pediatric ages. Objective: To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of pediatric patients hospitalized at the Hospital Universitario de Caracas, during the period from January 2001 to December 2020. Method: Descriptive and retrospective study, using as inclusion criteria all pediatric patients between 0-12 years of age who are admitted with the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Data such as age, sex, socioeconomic level, comorbidities, predisposing factors, clinical, paraclinical, echocardiographic findings, and indicated therapy were collected; being analyzed with descriptive statistics, in order to establish frequency distribution tables. Results: 17 patients were included in the study, the male gender, the newborns and preschoolers were the ones who developed this pathology with survival of 70.8 %. The main predisposing factor for its development was the presence of central venous catheter. Candida spp was isolated in 42.9 % of blood cultures. Conclusion: In infective endocarditis, despite having low incidence, complications and mortality can be high; therefore, in all patients with a central venous catheter, with symptoms of fever, tachycardia and heart murmur, with paraclinical findings of leukocytosis, anemia and elevation of acute phase reactants, it is suggested to discard it.

First wave of COVID-19 in Venezuela: Epidemiological, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics of first cases.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has particularly affected countries with weakened health services in Latin America, where proper patient management could be a critical step to address the epidemic. In this study, we aimed to characterize and identify which epidemiological, clinical, and paraclinical risk factors defined COVID-19 infection from the first confirmed cases through the first epidemic wave in Venezuela. A retrospective analysis of consecutive suspected cases of COVID-19 admitted to a sentinel hospital was carried out, including 576 patient cases subsequently confirmed for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Of these, 162 (28.1%) patients met the definition criteria for severe/critical disease, and 414 (71.2%) were classified as mild/moderate disease. The mean age was 47 (SD 16) years, the majority of which were men (59.5%), and the most frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (23.3%). The most common symptoms included fever (88.7%), headache (65.6%), and dry cough (63.9%). Severe/critical disease affected mostly older males with low schooling (p < 0.001). Similarly, higher levels of glycemia, urea, aminotransferases, total bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were observed in severe/critical disease patients compared to those with mild/moderate disease. Overall mortality was 7.6% (44/576), with 41.7% (28/68) dying in hospital. We identified risk factors related to COVID-19 infection, which could help healthcare providers take appropriate measures and prevent severe clinical outcomes. Our results suggest that the mortality registered by this disease in Venezuela during the first epidemic wave was underestimated. An increase in fatalities is expected to occur in the coming months unless measures that are more effective are implemented to mitigate the epidemic while the vaccination process is ongoing.

Remitting neuropsychiatric symptoms in COVID-19 patients: Viral cause or drug effect?

Numerous reports of neuropsychiatric symptoms highlighted the pathologic potential of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its relationship the onset and/or exacerbation of mental disease. However, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments, themselves, must be considered as potential catalysts for new-onset neuropsychiatric symptoms in COVID-19 patients. To date, immediate and long-term neuropsychiatric complications following SARS-CoV-2 infection are currently unknown. Here we report on five patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection with possible associated neuropsychiatric involvement, following them clinically until resolution of their symptoms. We will also discuss the contributory roles of chloroquine and dexamethasone in these neuropsychiatric presentations.

Infecciones del sitio quirúrgico en un hospital de enseñanza. Estudio observacional / Surgical site infections in a teaching hospital. Observacional study

Objetivo: determinar el número de pacientes que desarrollaron una infección postquirúrgica, posibles agentes etiológicos y complicaciones.Métodos : se realizó un estudio retrospectivo observacional que incluye a todos los supervivientes de las cirugías electivas y de emergencia de los servicios de Cirugía I, II y III del Hospital Universitario de Caracas durante el año 2019. Los datos fueron recopilados a través de la revisión de historias médicas. 48 historias cumplieron los criterios de inclusión, en estas se analizaron distintas variables como: días de hospitalización, síntomas, resultados de laboratorio, cultivos microbiológicos y tratamientos. A partir de estas se elaboraron tablas de frecuencia y análisis bivariado (Chi-cuadrado de Pearson) con el programa IBM SPSS Statistics 26.Resultados : la prevalencia de las infecciones postoperatorias fue de 4,69% CI 95% = (2,79-7,16%) en los servicios de Cirugía (I, II y III) del hospital durante el año 2019, la mayoría ocurrieron tras cirugías de emergencia (87,50%) tales como: apendicectomías (45,83%) y colecistectomías (10,41%). Solo al 22,91% de estos pacientes se les realizó cultivo microbiológico donde se encontró:E. coli (10,50%), Enterococcus sp. y Klebsiella pneumoniae (6,24%), Morganella morganii (2,1%) y Streptococcus pneumoniae (2,1%). Conclusión : las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico siguen siendo una de las principales causas de morbi-mortalidad y aumento de la estadía hospitalaria en los servicios de cirugía, son de diversa etiología bacteriana y están mayormente asociadas a cirugías abdominales, de emergencia(AU)

Objective: to determine the number of patients that developed a surgical site infection (SSI), possible etiologic agents and complications.Methods : an observational and retrospective study that includes every patient that underwent and survived a surgical procedure at the general surgery I, II and III services at the University Hospital of Caracas between January and December 2019. The study data were collected through the review of the medical records. 48 medical records that met the inclusion criteria and different variables were analyzed, including: days of hospitalization, symptoms, laboratory results, microbiological cultures and treatments. From those variables, frequency tables and bivariate analysis (Pearson's Chi-Square) were created with the IBM SPSS Statistics 26 program.Results : the SSI prevalence was 4,69% CI 95%= (2,79-7,16%) including the three surgery services (I, II and III) at the University Hospital of Caracas during 2019. Most of these occurred after emergency surgeries (87,50%) among which stand out: appendectomy (45,83%) and cholecystectomies (10,41%). Microbiological cultures were performed only in 22,91% of these patients and the following bacteria were isolated:E. coli (10,50%), Enterococcus sp. plus Klebsiella pneumoniae (6,24%), Morganella morganii (2,1%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2,1%). Conclusion : Surgical Site Infection (SSI) continues to be one of the main causes of morbimortality and increased hospital stay in surgical services in the hospital. These infections have a diverse bacterial etiology and are mostly associated with abdominal or emergency surgeries(AU)

Caracterización de los niños con osteomielitis tratados en el Hospital Universitario de Caracas

La osteomielitis es una infección de importancia en la edad pediátrica dado su potencial para ocasionar secuelas que pueden llegar a la incapacidad temporal o permanente e incluso la muerte Objetivo: Describir las características de los pacientes pediátricos con diagnóstico de osteomielitis, hospitalizados entre 2013 y 2018 en el Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal, retrospectivo, descriptivo, se incluyeron los pacientes con el diagnóstico de osteomielitis que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión, analizados los datos mediante frecuencia, porcentaje, media y desviación estándar. Se compararon las variables en los pacientes con osteomielitis crónica y aguda mediante el cálculo de X2 . Resultados: Se encontró predominio masculino, edad promedio de 5,7 años ± 3,5 desviación estándar. La osteomielitis crónica fue más frecuente (68,5 % de los pacientes). La patología de base con mayor predisposición fue la drepanocitosis. El factor de riesgo más importante fue traumatismos. Las manifestaciones clínicas más comunes fueron la fiebre y el dolor. Los huesos más afectados: tibia (27,8 %) y fémur (20,4 %) de los casos. El microorganismo predominante fue Staphylococcus aureus en 31,5 % de los casos, tanto en la osteomielitis aguda como en la crónica, siendo meticilino resistente en 16,3 % de los aislamientos. El tratamiento antibiótico indicado fue combinado. El 94 % de los pacientes egresaron con buena evolución, no se registraron muertes. Conclusiones: Es importante sospechar tempranamente la osteomielitis, tomando conciencia de las manifestaciones clínicas, para agilizar los estudios diagnósticos que contribuyan a iniciar tratamiento precoz, y mejorar el pronóstico de los pacientes

Objective: To describe the characteristics of the pediatric hospitalized patients with diagnosis of osteomyelitis between 2013 and 2018 in the Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Methods: A transversal, retrospective, descriptive study was performed, in which every patient with diagnosis of acute and chronic osteomyelitis who met with all the inclusion criteria, were included. All data was collected in an instrument, designed for that matter, and then was analyzed with frequency, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Variables were compared in acute and chronic osteomyelitis with X2 calculation. Results: Male predominance was found, and average age between 5.7 years ± 3.5 standard deviation. Chronic osteomyelitis was the most frequent (68.5 % of all cases). The most predisposing underlying pathology was sickle cell disease. The most important risk factor was trauma. The most common clinical manifestations were fever and pain in both study groups. The most affected bones: tibia in 27.8 % and femur in 20.4 % of patients. The predominant microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus in 31.5 % of the cases, both in acute and chronic osteomyelitis, being methicillin resistant in 16.3 % of the isolates and in 23.3 % methicilline sensitive. The antibiotic treatment indicated in most cases was combined, followed by surgical treatment. 94 % of the patients were discharged with good outcome, no deaths were registered. Conclusions: The early suspicion of osteomyelitis is important, becoming aware of the clinical manifestations, so as to promptly apply the ideal diagnostic method and contribute to early treatment, in this way improve the patients' prognosis.

Prevalencia de malaria y utilidad de las pruebas de diagnóstico rápido en Playa Colorada. Una investigación de CUMIS UCV

La malaria es una de las enfermedades metaxénicas más importantes en la actualidad y en Venezuela, constituye la mayor epidemia del siglo XXI en la región de las Américas. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo determinar la prevalencia de casos de malaria en Playa Colorada, Estado Sucre, diagnosticados durante la jornada de trabajo de Campamento Universitario Multidisciplinario de Investigación y Servicio de la Universidad Central de Venezuela (CUMIS UCV) y comparar la utilidad diagnóstica de la prueba rápida SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v. Estudio epidemiológico, observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal y correlacional, realizado en 29 pacientes, entre el 22 y 24 de junio del año 2019. Se obtuvo una prevalencia de 1,05 % con respecto a los pacientes totales de la jornada, lo cual representa un 31 % de casos confirmados de malaria en los pacientes incluidos en el estudio. Las pruebas rápidas para malaria sólo reportaron un falso positivo y ningún falso negativo con respecto a la gota gruesa y extendido. A pesar de que el Estado Sucre constituye uno de los principales contribuyentes de casos de malaria en el país, la prevalencia reportada en este estudio fue baja, posiblemente debido a múltiples factores como las infecciones asintomáticas y submicroscópicas en zonas endémicas. Se recomienda el despistaje de pacientes asintomáticos y la utilización de métodos de diagnóstico molecular al momento de planificar estrategias de control de infecciones

Malaria is one of the most important metaxenic diseases today and in Venezuela, it constitutes the largest epidemic of the 21st century in the region of the Americas. The objective of this work is to determine the prevalence of malaria cases in Playa Colorada, Sucre state, diagnosed during the Multidisciplinary University Camp for Research and Service of the Central University of Venezuela (CUMIS UCV) field trip and to compare the diagnostic utility of the SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v rapid test. Epidemiological, observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and correlational study, carried out in 29 patients, between June 22 and 24, 2019. A prevalence of 1.05 % was obtained with respect to total day patients, which represents 31 % of confirmed cases of malaria in the patients included in the study. Rapid tests for malaria reported only one false positive and no false negatives for the thick and thin blood smear. Despite the fact that Sucre state constitutes one of the main contributors of malaria cases in the country, the prevalence reported in this study was low, possibly due to multiple factors such as asymptomatic and submicroscopic infections in endemic areas. Screening of asymptomatic patients and the use of molecular diagnostic methods is recommended when planning infection control strategies

Amoebic liver abscess in a COVID-19 patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Amoebiasis is a parasitic disease caused by Entamoeba histolytica, which affects people living in low- and middle-income countries and has intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. To date, knowledge on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) coinfection with enteric parasites is limited, and E. histolytica coinfection has not been previously described. Here we present the case of a patient with COVID-19 who, during hospitalisation, presented a clinical picture consistent with an amoebic liver abscess (ALA). CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old man, admitted as a suspected case of COVID-19, presented to our hospital with dyspnoea, malaise, fever and hypoxaemia. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. After 7 days, he developed diarrhoea, choluria and dysentery. An abdominal ultrasound showed a lesion compatible with a liver abscess; stool examination revealed E. histolytica trophozoites, and additional serology for E. histolytica was positive. After 12 days of treatment with metronidazole, ceftazidime and nitazoxanide, the patient reported acute abdominal pain, and an ultrasound examination revealed free liquid in the abdominal cavity. An emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed, finding 3000 mL of a thick fluid described as "anchovy paste". Computed tomography scan revealed a second abscess. He ended up receiving 21 days of antibiotic treatment and was discharged with satisfactory improvement. CONCLUSION: Here we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of ALA and COVID-19 co-presenting. Based on their pathophysiological similarities, coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and E. histolytica could change the patient's clinical course; however, larger studies are needed to fully understand the interaction between these pathogens.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to COVID-19 among patients at Hospital Universitario de Caracas triage tent: A cross-sectional study. / Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas relacionadas con COVID-19 en pacientes de la carpa de triaje del Hospital Universitario de Caracas: un estudio transversal

INTRODUCTION: The studies on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding COVID-19 help to identify erroneous concepts and inadequate practices related to the disease. This baseline information is essential to design effective strategies and improve adherence to prevention measures. OBJECTIVE: To identify the COVID-19-related KAP in Venezuelan patients screened at the Hospital Universitario de Caracas triage tent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 215 patients between April 25th and May 25th, 2020, with in-person interviews using a KAP survey. RESULTS: Most surveyed patients (53.5%) were asymptomatic. Most of them, both from the symptomatic and the asymptomatic groups, had adequate knowledge about the symptoms and transmission of the disease and the majority said they were practicing quarantine, frequent handwashing, and the use of face masks in public areas. However, the daily replacement of cloth face masks was more frequent in the asymptomatic group whereas replacement every three days was more frequent in the symptomatic group. Finally, more than half of the participants admitted having been in crowded places, a common practice among the symptomatic compared to the asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first KAP study in Venezuela about COVID-19. Knowledge and practices among Venezuelans could be improved by strengthening education and training programs. This information from the early phase of the pandemic in Venezuela may contribute to the design of COVID-19 promotion and prevention strategies.

Introducción: Los estudios sobre conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas (CAP) sobre COVID-19 ayudan a identificar conceptos erróneos y prácticas inadecuadas relacionadas con la enfermedad. Esta información de referencia es fundamental para diseñar estrategias efectivas y mejorar la adherencia a las medidas de prevención. Objetivo: Identificar la CAP relacionada con COVID-19 en pacientes venezolanos cribados en la carpa de triaje del Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Materiales y métodos: Realizamos un estudio transversal entre 215 pacientes entre el 25 de abril y el 25 de mayo de 2020, con entrevistas en persona utilizando una encuesta KAP. Resultados: La mayoría de los pacientes encuestados (53,5%) se encontraban asintomáticos. La mayoría de ellos, tanto del grupo sintomático como asintomático, tenían un conocimiento adecuado sobre los síntomas y la transmisión de la enfermedad y la mayoría dijo que practicaban la cuarentena, el lavado frecuente de manos y el uso de mascarillas en las áreas públicas. Sin embargo, el reemplazo diario de mascarillas de tela fue más frecuente en el grupo asintomático, mientras que el reemplazo cada tres días fue más frecuente en el grupo sintomático. Finalmente, más de la mitad de los participantes admitieron haber estado en lugares concurridos, una práctica común entre los sintomáticos en comparación con los asintomáticos. Conclusiones: Este es el primer estudio CAP en Venezuela sobre COVID-19. El conocimiento y las prácticas entre los venezolanos podrían mejorarse fortaleciendo los programas de educación y capacitación. Esta información de la fase inicial de la pandemia en Venezuela puede contribuir al diseño de estrategias de promoción y prevención del COVID-19.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to COVID-19 among patients at Hospital Universitario de Caracas triage tent: A cross-sectional study / Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas relacionadas con la Covid-19 en pacientes atendidos en la carpa de triaje del Hospital Universitario de Caracas: un estudio transversal

Abstract | Introduction: The studies on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding COVID-19 help to identify erroneous concepts and inadequate practices related to the disease. This baseline information is essential to design effective strategies and improve adherence to prevention measures. Objective: To identify the COVID-19-related KAP in Venezuelan patients screened at the Hospital Universitario de Caracas triage tent. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 215 patients between April 25th and May 25th, 2020, with in-person interviews using a KAP survey. Results: Most surveyed patients (53.5%) were asymptomatic. Most of them, both from the symptomatic and the asymptomatic groups, had adequate knowledge about the symptoms and transmission of the disease and the majority said they were practicing quarantine, frequent handwashing, and the use of face masks in public areas. However, the daily replacement of cloth face masks was more frequent in the asymptomatic group whereas replacement every three days was more frequent in the symptomatic group. Finally, more than half of the participants admitted having been in crowded places, a common practice among the symptomatic compared to the asymptomatic patients. Conclusions: This is the first KAP study in Venezuela about COVID-19. Knowledge and practices among Venezuelans could be improved by strengthening education and training programs. This information from the early phase of the pandemic in Venezuela may contribute to the design of COVID-19 promotion and prevention strategies.

Resumen | Introducción. Los estudios de conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas (CAP) relacionados con la Covid-19 permiten establecer los conceptos erróneos y las prácticas inadecuadas en torno a esta enfermedad, información fundamental para diseñar estrategias eficaces y mejorar el cumplimiento de las medidas de prevención. Objetivo. Establecer los conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas relacionadas con la Covid-19 en pacientes venezolanos cribados en la carpa de triaje del Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio transversal en 215 pacientes entre el 25 de abril y el 25 de mayo de 2020, mediante entrevistas personales y utilizando una encuesta sobre conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas. Resultados. La mayoría (53,5 %) de los pacientes encuestados se encontraba asintomática; los encuestados tenían un conocimiento adecuado sobre los síntomas y la transmisión de la enfermedad, sin distinción entre sintomáticos y asintomáticos. La mayoría de ellos indicó estar respetando las prácticas de cuarentena, lavado de manos frecuente y uso de tapabocas en público; sin embargo, el reemplazo diario de los tapabocas de tela fue más frecuente en el grupo de los asintomáticos, en tanto que el reemplazo cada tres días fue más común entre los sintomáticos. Por último, más de la mitad de los participantes admitió haber estado en lugares concurridos, siendo esta práctica más frecuente entre los sintomáticos que entre los asintomáticos. Conclusiones. Este es el primer estudio de conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas sobre la Covid-19 en Venezuela. El conocimiento y las prácticas de los venezolanos podrían mejorar mediante el fortalecimiento de los programas de educación y capacitación. Esta información, obtenida durante la fase inicial de la pandemia en Venezuela, podría contribuir al diseño de estrategias de promoción y prevención de la Covid-19.

The use of non- invasive ventilation in asthma exacerbation - a two year retrospective analysis of outcomes.

Background: The use of Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in acute asthma exacerbation remains controversial. Comparative data on patient characteristics that benefit from NIV in asthma exacerbation to those patients that fail NIV remains limited. Our study compares some of these patient characteristics and examines if NIV is safe and effective in carefully selected patients. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, we extracted from the electronic medical record and conducted a retrospective chart-based review of those patients who received NIV in the emergency room for a diagnosis of asthma exacerbation from January 2017 to December 2018. Results and Conclusion: The rate of failure of NIV overall was low, at 9.17%, with younger patients more likely to fail NIV (P = 0.03) and need invasive mechanical ventilation. Surprisingly, baseline asthma severity did not impact NIV failure rate, and neither did body mass index, smoking history, and a host of clinical characteristics. Understandably, the length of stay was significantly longer in the group of patients that failed NIV. There were no adverse events, such as an increased rate of barotrauma events in either group. In conclusion, this study contributes to the growing body of evidence that NIV is a safe and effective adjunct to routine care in the management of patients with asthma exacerbation.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers in Venezuela: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey.

Background: The deterioration of Venezuela's health system in recent years undoubtedly contributes to an increased impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding healthcare workers' (HCWs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) toward COVID-19 in the early stages of the pandemic could inform their medical training and improve their preparedness. Methods: A online national cross-sectional survey was conducted between May 26th and May 30th, 2020, to assess KAPs among HCWs in Venezuela. Results: A total of 1,441 HCWs from all 24 regions of the country responded to the survey. The mean age of the HCWs was 44 (SD [standard deviation] 14) years; most were women (66.4%). Most HCWs were specialized doctors (48%), followed by nurses (13%) and resident doctors (12.3%). The majority of HCWs had good knowledge (76.3%), obtained information mainly from scientific literature (85.4%); had negative attitudes (53.6%), felt uncomfortable with their work during the current pandemic (59.8%); and reported appropriate practices (76.9%). However, participation in COVID-19 related training was absent in more than half of the HCWs. Positive attitudes were significantly more frequent in frontline workers than in non-frontline workers (p = 0.001). Bioanalysts, students, and doctors were more likely to have good knowledge; participating in training was a predictor for positive attitudes and older age was an appropriate practice predictor. Conclusions: HCWs, knowledge in Venezuela could be improved by strengthening education and training programs. Strategies should focus on reducing fear and improving attitudes toward the care of COVID-19 patients, as well as the promotion of preventive practices.

Complications following symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction.

BACKGROUND: Thoracentesis using suction is perceived to have increased risk of complications, including pneumothorax and re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPO). Current guidelines recommend limiting drainage to 1.5 L to avoid REPO. Our purpose was to examine the incidence of complications with symptom-limited drainage of pleural fluid using suction and identify risk factors for REPO. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction at our institution between January 1, 2004 and August 31, 2018 was performed, and a total of 10 344 thoracenteses were included. RESULTS: Pleural fluid ≥1.5 L was removed in 19% of the procedures. Thoracentesis was stopped due to chest discomfort (39%), complete drainage of fluid (37%) and persistent cough (13%). Pneumothorax based on chest radiography was detected in 3.98%, but only 0.28% required intervention. The incidence of REPO was 0.08%. The incidence of REPO increased with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥3 compounded with ≥1.5 L (0.04-0.54%; 95% CI 0.13-2.06 L). Thoracentesis in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift did not increase complications, but less fluid was removed (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction is safe even with large volumes. Pneumothorax requiring intervention and REPO are both rare. There were no increased procedural complications in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift. REPO increased with poor ECOG PS and drainage ≥1.5 L. Symptom-limited drainage using suction without pleural manometry is safe.

COVID-19: abordaje terapéutico y recomendaciones de la Sociedad Venezolana de Infectología

Alrededor del 80 % de los casos sintomáticos de COVID-19 tienen una enfermedad leve a moderada, que no suele progresar a fases más avanzadas. El 14 % de los casos pueden progresar en unos 7 a 10 días a un cuadro severo pulmonar, mientras que un 6 % siguen deteriorándose en el tiempo ante una respuesta hiperinflamatoria o de tormenta de citoquinas, que conlleva a shock y falla de múltiples órganos. En general tienen mayor riesgo de progresión los individuos con factores de riesgo como edad mayor de 60 años, género masculino, obesidad, diabetes, hipertensión, inmunosupresión, trasplante de órganos sólidos, enfermedad renal, tabaquismo; pero eso no descarta la posibilidad aislada que individuos aparentemente sanos puedan presentar una evolución severa o diversas complicaciones pulmonares, renales, cardiovasculares, neurológicas, endocrinológicas, entre otras. Este consenso busca orientar al personal de salud en Venezuela en el abordaje terapéutico y la atención de las personas con COVID-19, estableciendo recomendaciones con base a la mejor evidencia para la fecha. Las recomendaciones no solo se limitan a definir qué opciones terapéuticas han mostrado mayor eficacia y seguridad, sino que determina cuáles drogas carecen todavía de suficiente evidencia, y qué alternativas no deberían utilizarse por carecer de beneficios y/o de seguridad establecida. La medicina basada en la evidencia busca fundamentar las decisiones clínicas con base en evidencias; que son todos los elementos y hechos que demuestran jerárquicamente el nivel de veracidad y validez de diversos planteamientos en medicina. El mayor nivel de evidencia terapéutica se construye por medio de metaanálisis y revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura con base en estudios clínicos controlados, prospectivos, con asignación al azar por doble ciego, y con una muestra lo suficientemente importante; y es este tipo de evidencia la que se ha considerado más relevante para establecer las recomendaciones.

About 80 % of symptomatic COVID-19 cases have mild to moderate illness, which does not usually progress to more advanced stages. 14 % of cases can progress in about 7 to 10 days to a severe pulmonary condition, while 6 % continue to deteriorate over time in the face of a hyperinflammatory response or cytokine storm, which leads to shock and failure of multiple organs. In general, individuals with risk factors such as age over 60 years, male gender, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, immunosuppression, solid organ transplantation, kidney disease, smoking, generally have a higher risk of progression. but that does not rule out the isolated possibility that apparently healthy individuals may present a severe evolution or various pulmonary, renal, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrinological complications, among others. This consensus seeks to guide health personnel in Venezuela in the therapeutic approach and care of people with COVID-19, establishing recommendations based on the best evidence to date. The recommendations are not only limited to defining which therapeutic options have shown greater efficacy and safety, but also determine which drugs still lack sufficient evidence, and which alternatives should not be used due to lack of benefits and / or established safety. Evidence-based medicine seeks to base evidencebased clinical decisions; which are all the elements and facts that hierarchically demonstrate the level of veracity and validity of various approaches in medicine. The highest level of therapeutic evidence is constructed through meta-analysis and systematic reviews of the literature based on controlled, prospective clinical studies, with double-blind randomization, and with a sufficiently large sample; and it is this type of evidence that has been considered most relevant to establish the recommendations.

Aislamiento microbiológico en trabajadores de salud posterior a la higiene de manos

Introducción: La higiene de manos es un paso fundamental para prevenir la transmisión y diseminación de infecciones asociadas a la atención en salud (IAAS), por esto, es de vital importancia su correcta ejecución según los 5 momentos sugeridos por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Objetivo: Aislar bacterias y hongos posterior a la higiene de las manos en el personal de salud. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, experimental, transversal, con una muestra de 16 individuos que laboraban en el Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas del Adulto del Hospital Universitario de Caracas, divididos en dos grupos de 8 participantes, quienes realizaron la higiene de manos de acuerdo a las técnicas descritas por la Organización Mundial de la Salud con agua y jabón (grupo A) y con gel antibacterial a base de alcohol al 70 % (grupo B). Consecutivamente, se tomó muestra de las manos mediante aposición en placas de Petri, en Agar Endo (HiMedia™) y Agar Sabouraud (Oxoid™). Los crecimientos positivos fueron repicados a otros agares y se realizaron pruebas bioquímicas para su identificación. Resultados: En 56,25 % (9/16) de las muestras hubo crecimiento de levaduras, a partir de las cuales se identificaron C. parapsilosis (77,7 %), C. tropicalis (11,3 %) y C. kefyr (11,3 %). Por su parte, 50 % (8/16) tuvieron crecimiento positivo para bacilos Gram negativos fermentadores y no fermentadores. Conclusiones: En las manos de los trabajadores de salud se aislaron bacilos Gram negativos fermentadores y no fermentadores, así como especies de Candida. Se observó una mayor eficacia antimicrobiana con el uso de agua y jabón líquido con respecto a la eliminación de Candida spp.

Introduction: Hand washing is a key tool to prevent transmission and dissemination of hospital associated infections; thus it is a very important to elaborate the proper technique to achieve hand antisepsis, throughout several methods including the 5 times to hand washing proposed by World Health Organization (WHO). Aim: To isolate bacteria and fungi after handwashing in a group of healthcare personnel. Methods: This was an experimental, descriptive and cross-sectional study carried out with 16 healthcare personnel from the Adult Infectious Disease Department at the Hospital Universitario de Caracas, divided in 2 groups (A and B) of 8 participants who was asked and instructed to performed the handwashing technique stablished by the WHO. Group A used conventional soap and water, while group B used 70 % alcohol-based hand sanitizer. After hand sanitization with any of both substances, sample collection was performed throughout hand apposition in Petri dishes with Endo agar (HiMedia™) and Sabouraud dextrose agar with chloramphenicol (Oxoid™) and incubated during 36h in an aerobic 37 °C atmosphere. Positive growth in each case was replied and biochemical tests were performed to each isolation to confirm its identification. Results: 56.25 % (9/16) of the growth was represented by Candida sp: C. parapsilosis (77.7 %), C. tropicalis (11.33 %) and C. kefyr (11.3 %). About bacteria, 50 % (8/16) of the samples collected had growth for gram negative fermenting and nonfermenting bacilli. Conclusions: There were presence of gram-negative bacilli and fungi after handwashing in the hands of the healthcare personnel studied. It was observed that water and soap had a better antimicrobial outcome in comparison with alcohol-based sanitizer to eliminate Candida sp.

Conocimientos, prácticas y actitudes para la higiene de manos del personal médico durante la pandemia COVID-19 en el Hospital Universitario de Caracas

Introducción: La práctica de la higiene de manos por el personal de salud es un elemento esencial para prevenir la transmisión de las infecciones asociadas a la atención sanitaria. El objetivo es evaluar el conocimiento, las prácticas y la actitud del personal de salud médico para la higiene de las manos y las condiciones sanitarias mínimas durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en el Hospital Universitario de Caracas, mayo 2020. Metodología: Estudio de corte transversal intrahospitalario. Población: Médicos adjuntos y residentes, y estudiantes presentes al momento de la visita al Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Instrumentos: Entrevistas, cuestionarios, inspecciones y observaciones del lavado de las manos en trabajo intrahospitalario. Análisis estadístico. Programa SPSS 21 para las estadísticas descriptivas con tablas de distribuciones de frecuencia, promedios, porcentajes, desviaciones estándar y percentiles. Pruebas de Chi2 con límites de confianza del 95 %. Resultados: 42 autocuestionarios, 32 a adjuntos y residentes, 75,6 % jóvenes menores de 30 años y 59 % femeninos. Conocimiento suficiente 74 %, las prácticas auto reportadas el 69 % correctas, y la actitud positiva 87 %. 51 áreas inspeccionadas con fallas de agua 16 %, lavamanos funcionales en 28 % de los ambientes, y falta de jabón, gel alcoholado o toallas desechables. 59 % de los baños para pacientes en malas condiciones sanitarias. Observaciones de higiene de manos durante el acto médico (100 momentos), solo 9 % correctos. La inspección del área de triaje de COVID-19 muestra que se cumplen con lavado de manos con gel alcoholado. La inspección del hospital (OMS) reporta 95 puntos nivel de higiene inadecuado con prácticas de HM y promoción deficientes. Formulario inspección de la OMS ante la COVID-19 arroja fallas en infraestructura, insumos y disponibilidad de EPP y falta de auditorías. Discusión: El conocimiento y las prácticas en puntajes moderados requieren educación médica continua, y la actitud muy positiva del personal de salud permitirán mejorar las prácticas en el lugar de trabajo, siempre que se disponga de la infraestructura, agua y jabón, y de gel alcoholado para el cumplimiento del lavado de las manos en los 5 momentos del acto médico. Conclusión: El hospital requiere mejoras importantes de la infraestructura y la entrega de materiales para la correcta higiene de las manos.

Background: The practice of correct hand hygiene by health workers is a key element in the prevention of health care associated infections. The aim of the study is to assess the knowledge, practice and attitudes of the medical staff on hand hygiene and the minimum sanitary conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic at the Hospital Universitario de Caracas during May 2020. Methods: Transversal study based at the Hospital. Population: medical staff, residents, and medical students present when the inspection team visited the Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Instruments: interviews, questionnaires, inspection and observation of the hand hygiene process during hospital work. Statistical analysis: SPSS 21 software for the descriptive statistics, with frequency distribution tables average, percentage, standard deviation and percentiles. Chi2 test with 95 % confidence limits. Results: 42 self-administered questionnaires, 32 to medical staff and residents, 75,6 % were less than 30 years old and 59 % were female. 74 % had sufficient knowledge, correct self reported practice 69 %, positive attitude 87 %. 51 inspected areas, water failure 16 %, working sinks in 28 % of the areas, lack of soap, alcoholic gel or paper towels. 59 % of patient toilet facilities in bad sanitary conditions. Observations of hand hygiene procedures during medical work (100 moments) were only 9 % correct. Inspection of the COVID-19 triage area showed proper alcoholic gel hand hygiene. Hospital inspection (WHO) reported 95 inadequate hygiene points with deficient hand hygiene and promotion. WHO COVID-19 Inspection Form showed infrastructure failures, lack of supplies and availability of PPE and lack of audits. Discussion: Knowledge and practice had moderate scores which require intervention on the continuous medical education. The staff's positive attitude will allow improvement of practices at the workplace whenever infrastructure and supplies are available, especially soap and water or alcoholic gel, for the 5 moment hand hygiene protocol compliance. Conclusion: The hospital requires important infrastructure and supplies improvements for this purpose.

Granulomatous mastitis due to coinfection with Histoplasma sp. and Paracoccidioides sp.: A case report.

A 51 years old female patient with granulomatous mastitis diagnosis, was referred to the Medical Mycology Department "Dr. Dante Borelli" at the Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidad Central de Venezuela (IMT-UCV). Mycological diagnosis demonstrated the presence of intracellular yeast structures suggesting Histoplasma sp. and also multi-budding structures compatible with Paracoccidioides sp. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a granulomatous mastitits due to coinfection of both fungi. 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.