Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
World J Urol ; 39(11): 4117-4125, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34076753

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes for men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer who were selected for transponder-guided salvage radiotherapy (SRT) to the prostate bed alone by 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA-PET). METHODS: This is a single-arm, prospective study of men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level rising to 0.1-2.5 ng/mL following radical prostatectomy. Patients were staged with 68Ga-PSMA-PET and those with a negative finding, or a positive finding localised to the prostate bed, continued to SRT only to the prostate bed alone with real-time target-tracking using electromagnetic transponders. The primary endpoint was freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR, PSA > 0.2 ng/mL from the post-radiotherapy nadir). Secondary endpoints were time to biochemical relapse, toxicity and patient-reported quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (median PSA of 0.18 ng/ml, IQR 0.12-0.36), were screened with 68Ga-PSMA-PET and metastatic disease was found in 20 (21.7%) patients. Sixty-nine of 72 non-metastatic patients elected to proceed with SRT. At the interim (3-year) analysis, 32 (46.4%) patients (95% CI 34.3-58.8%) were FFBR. The median time to biochemical relapse was 16.1 months. The rate of FFBR was 82.4% for ISUP grade-group 2 patients. Rates of grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were 0% and 15.2%, respectively. General health and disease-specific QoL remained stable. CONCLUSION: Pre-SRT 68Ga-PSMA-PET scans detect metastatic disease in a proportion of patients at low PSA levels but fail to improve FFBR. Transponder-guided SRT to the prostate bed alone is associated with a favourable toxicity profile and preserved QoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615001183572, 03/11/2015, retrospectively registered.


Subject(s)
Gallium Isotopes , Gallium Radioisotopes , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiopharmaceuticals , Salvage Therapy/methods , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Prospective Studies , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
2.
World J Urol ; 35(8): 1199-1203, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27987032

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the rate of hospital admissions for infection after transperineal biopsy of prostate (TPB) with single-dose cephazolin prophylaxis using a prospective database. METHOD: Between April 2013 and February 2016, 577 patients undergoing TPB had 2 g of cephazolin given intravenously at induction of anaesthesia. Data collected from these patients included age, PSA, prostate volume, number of cores taken and post-operative complications. RESULTS: No patients were readmitted to hospital with infection post-TPB. Seven patients developed acute urinary retention, and one patient developed clinical prostatitis that was treated with oral antibiotics in the community. CONCLUSION: It is safe to use single-dose cephazolin only as antibiotic prophylaxis prior to TPB, negating the need for quinolones. This study supports Australia's current Therapeutic Guidelines recommendation for TPB prophylaxis and the existing evidence that sepsis post-TPB is a rare complication. Whether any antibiotic prophylaxis is needed at all for TPB is the subject of a future study.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Sepsis/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Databases, Factual , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Perineum , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
3.
ANZ J Surg ; 85(7-8): 529-34, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24820851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The adoption of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasing in Australia; however, to date no Australian RAPN series has been reported. This paper describes a single-surgeon initial experience with RAPN and evaluates perioperative, pathological and oncological outcomes. METHODS: Data on the first 50 consecutive patients to undergo RAPN by a single surgeon were reviewed. Demographic, perioperative, tumour characteristics and Clavien complications were collected in addition to oncological follow-up and renal function monitoring. RESULTS: Mean age was 58.2 ± 10.4 years, body mass index was 28.8 ± 4.5 kg/m(2) and Charlson Co-morbidity Index was 4.6 ± 1.2. Tumour diameter was 31 ± 13 mm and RENAL score was 6.8 ± 1.5. Average total operative time was 151 ± 32.7 min, estimated blood loss was 171.1 ± 185.8 mL, warm ischaemia time was 17.8 ± 6.7 min and length of hospital stay was 3 ± 0.9 days. There were seven Clavien complications and no deaths. Estimated glomerular filtration rate did not decrease significantly post-operatively (P = 0.8); and there was 14.6% upstaging of chronic kidney disease scoring although no patient required dialysis. There were no positive malignant surgical margins, and to date no patient has evidence of disease recurrence. Of 50 patients, 54% had a minimum follow-up of 6 months and 28% had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. CONCLUSION: We report the largest RAPN study in Australia or New Zealand to date. Initial results suggest that RAPN can be safely introduced into the Australian public and private health systems, and has been effective in oncologic control and renal function preservation.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Victoria/epidemiology , Warm Ischemia
4.
BJU Int ; 115(6): 884-91, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24989062

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess, in men undergoing active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer, whether saturation or transperineal biopsy altered oncological outcomes, compared with standard transrectal biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from two cohorts with localised prostate cancer (1998-2012) undergoing AS. Prostate cancer-specific, metastasis-free and treatment-free survival, unfavourable disease and significant cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP) were compared for standard (<12 core, median 10) vs saturation (>12 core, median 16), and transrectal vs transperineal biopsy, using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In all, 650 men were included in the analysis with a median (mean) follow-up of 55 (67) months. Prostate cancer-specific, metastasis-free and biochemical recurrence-free survival were 100%, 100% and 99% respectively. Radical treatment-free survival at 5 and 10 years were 57% and 45% respectively (median time to treatment 7.5 years). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, saturation biopsy was associated with increased objective biopsy progression requiring treatment (log-rank P = 0.01). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, saturation biopsy (hazard ratio 1.68, P < 0.01) but not transperineal approach (P = 0.89) was associated with increased objective biopsy progression requiring treatment. On logistic regression analysis of 179 men who underwent RP for objective progression, transperineal biopsy was associated with lower likelihood of unfavourable RP pathology (odds ratio 0.42, P = 0.03) but saturation biopsy did not alter the likelihood (P = 0.25). Neither transperineal nor saturation biopsy altered the likelihood of significant vs insignificant cancer at RP (P = 0.19 and P = 0.41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: AS achieved satisfactory oncological outcomes. Saturation biopsy increased progression to treatment on AS; longer follow-up is needed to determine if this represents beneficial earlier detection of significant disease or over-treatment. Transperineal biopsy reduced the likelihood of unfavourable disease at RP, possibly due to earlier detection of anterior tumours.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
BJU Int ; 114 Suppl 1: 29-33, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24825396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the recovery of urinary continence (UC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men aged ≥70 and <70 years at 1-year follow-up and to assess for preoperative predictors of UC recovery, as older, healthy men with localised prostate cancer are often denied curative surgical treatment on the grounds of worse UC recovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 262 patients with prostate cancer having undergone RARP between May 2008 and September 2012, under the care of two consultant urological surgeons at three Melbourne hospitals, were identified. Patients were categorised based on their age ≥70 and <70 years and compared with regards to two endpoints; percentage fully continent and mean pads/day at 4-6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after RARP. RESULTS: Of the 262 men, 9% (24) were aged ≥70 years. Older men had higher PSA levels (P = 0.007) and clinical stages (P < 0.001) compared with the younger cohort. There were more non-nerve sparing procedures in the older group (P = 0.009) and a shorter mean operative time (P = 0.004). At 4-6 weeks after RARP, the number of pads used per day was greater in older men (P = 0.03) and there was a trend towards fewer older men being fully continent (P = 0.08) than their younger counterparts; however, by 3 months and all time-points thereafter there was no difference. The 12-month UC rates were 89% and 92% for men aged <70 and ≥70 years, respectively. Neither age, body mass index, D'Amico risk group, nerve sparing nor use of Rocco suture were predictors of time to UC recovery. CONCLUSION: UC recovery after RARP in men aged ≥70 years appears comparable to younger men and therefore not a reason to deny older men with a reasonable life-expectancy curative surgical treatment of localised prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Recovery of Function/physiology , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Australia , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Robotics , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...