Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 50(3): 273-279, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36967327

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the use of a three-dimensional (3D) printed device enhances the success rate of orotracheal intubation in rabbits. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, crossover randomized controlled trial. ANIMALS: A total of six mixed-breed rabbits. METHODS: A device to guide the endotracheal tube was designed based on computed tomography images and then manufactured using 3D printing. Rabbits were randomly assigned for intubation by two inexperienced veterinarians using the blind (BLI), borescope- (BOR) or device- (DEV) guided techniques. Success rate, number of attempts, time to success, injury scores and propofol dose were recorded and compared. Significance was considered when p < 0.05. RESULTS: Success rate was higher in DEV (58.3%) than in BLI (8.3%) (p < 0.023), but not different from that in BOR (41.6%). Total time until successful intubation was lower in DEV (45 ± 23 seconds) and BOR (85 ± 62 seconds) than in BLI (290 seconds; p < 0.006). Time for the successful attempt was lower for DEV (35 ± 10 seconds) and BOR (74 ± 43 seconds) than in BLI (290 seconds; p < 0.0001). The propofol dose required was lower for DEV (2.3 ± 1.2 mg kg-1) than for BLI (3.4 ± 1.6 mg kg-1) (p < 0.031), but not different from BOR (2.4 ± 0.9 mg kg-1). Number of attempts and oxygen desaturation events were not different among techniques (p < 0.051 and p < 0.326, respectively). Injury scores [median (range)] before and after attempts were different in BLI [0 versus 1 (0-3), p < 0.005] and BOR [0 (0-1) versus 1 (0-3), p < 0.002] but not in DEV [0 (0-2) versus 0 (0-3), p < 0.109]. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The device facilitated orotracheal intubation with a time similar to the borescope-guided technique but faster than the traditional blind technique.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Propofol , Animals , Rabbits , Equipment Design/veterinary , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/veterinary , Prospective Studies
2.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 47(6): 797-802, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32900618

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare, versus a control, the sensory, sympathetic and motor blockade of lidocaine 1% and 2% administered epidurally in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 24 mixed-breed intact female dogs. METHODS: All dogs were administered dexmedetomidine, tramadol and meloxicam prior to general anesthesia with midazolam-propofol and isoflurane. Animals were randomly assigned for an epidural injection of lidocaine 1% (0.4 mL kg-1; group L1), lidocaine 2% (0.4 mL kg-1; group L2) or no injection (group CONTROL). Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2), and invasive systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were recorded every 5 minutes. Increases in physiological variables were treated with fentanyl (3 µg kg-1) intravenously (IV). Phenylephrine (1 µg kg-1) was administered IV when MAP was <60 mmHg. Postoperative pain [Glasgow Composite Pain Score - Short Form (GCPS-SF)] and return of normal ambulation were recorded at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours after extubation. RESULTS: There were no differences over time or among groups for HR, fR, Pe'CO2 and SAP. MAP and DAP were lower in epidural groups than in CONTROL (p = 0.0146 and 0.0047, respectively). There was no difference in the use of phenylephrine boluses. More fentanyl was administered in CONTROL than in L1 and L2 (p = 0.011). GCPS-SF was lower for L2 than for CONTROL, and lower in L1 than in both other groups (p = 0.001). Time to ambulation was 2 (1-2) hours in L1 and 3 (2-4) hours in L2 (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Epidural administration of lidocaine (0.4 mL kg-1) reduced fentanyl requirements and lowered MAP and DAP. Time to ambulation decreased and postoperative pain scores were improved by use of 1% lidocaine compared with 2% lidocaine.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural/veterinary , Hysterectomy/veterinary , Lidocaine/pharmacology , Motor Activity/drug effects , Ovariectomy/veterinary , Sympathetic Nervous System/drug effects , Animals , Dogs , Female , Lidocaine/administration & dosage
3.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 47(5): 676-680, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32718709

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To design and construct an affordable simulator of the cat larynx for training intubation maneuvers and to share the designs for its fabrication. STUDY DESIGN: Research and development study. ANIMALS: A domestic cat. METHODS: The cadaver of a cat, dead by natural causes, was frozen in sternal recumbency with the neck extended and the mouth wide open. A computed tomography image was acquired and used to construct a digital three-dimensional (3D) model of the pharynx and trachea. A digitally adapted model was 3D-printed and used to generate a silicone model of these structures, which was placed within a wooden container. The quality of the simulator was assessed by 46 veterinary anesthesiologists and veterinarians with experience in tracheal intubation maneuvers, and their opinions were obtained through an anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: Several preliminary prototypes were assessed regarding stability, texture and cost. Finally, a silicone model of a cat larynx (LaryngoCUBE) was produced and encased in a wooden container. Results from the questionnaire showed high scores regarding anatomy, tissue texture and intubation maneuver realism, compared with the real procedure. CONCLUSIONS: and clinical relevance Use of LaryngoCUBE as a training tool may improve the skills of students and reduce the use of animals for teaching endotracheal intubation. Blueprints and computational models are provided online so that the simulator can be fully reproduced.


Subject(s)
Cats , Education, Veterinary , Intubation, Intratracheal/veterinary , Larynx/anatomy & histology , Models, Anatomic , Animals , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Veterinarians
4.
J Feline Med Surg ; 22(2): 108-113, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744474

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the sedative and some physiological effects of tiletamine-zolazepam following buccal administration (BA) in cats. METHODS: Seven healthy spayed European shorthair cats (three males, four females) were studied twice in this randomized, blinded, crossover study. Each cat received two doses of tiletamine-zolazepam by BA: the low-dose (LD) group consisted of 5 mg/kg of each drug, and the high-dose (HD) group consisted of 7.5 mg/kg of each. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and a sedation score were recorded prior to administration of each treatment. The same variables plus the percentage of hemoglobin saturated with oxygen as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) were recorded at predefined intervals for the next 2 h. RESULTS: All cats completed the study. No retching or vomiting were observed. Hypersalivation was observed in 0/7 and 3/7 for LD and HD groups, respectively (P = 0.2). There were significant changes in scores over time for posture, response to clippers and response to manual restraint for both groups, without differences between groups. RR, HR and SAP changed significantly over time. SAP and RR were significantly lower for the HD than for the LD group. No values for hemoglobin saturation <95% were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: BA of tiletamine-zolazepam at the doses studied here is a simple and effective method for chemical restraint in cats, where the LD group had a lower impact on SAP and RR than the HD group.


Subject(s)
Heart Rate/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Respiratory Rate/drug effects , Tiletamine , Zolazepam , Administration, Buccal , Animals , Cats , Conscious Sedation/methods , Conscious Sedation/veterinary , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Combinations , Female , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Male , Tiletamine/administration & dosage , Tiletamine/pharmacology , Zolazepam/administration & dosage , Zolazepam/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...