Detection of the human Parvovirus B19 in nonimmune hydrops fetalis using immunohistochemistry and nested-PCR in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded placenta and fetal tissues.

The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is an association between Parvovirus B19 infection and hydrops fetalis setting in fetus and neonate. Twenty-nine samples were analyzed by three methods. Each sample was histologically examined for viral nuclear inclusions in fetal organs and placenta, then immunohistochemical study using Parvovirus B19 antibody that recognized the VP2 protein of the Parvovirus B19 capsid was done in tissue embedded in paraffin (lungs, liver, thymus, kidneys, heart and placenta). Nested-PCR analysis was done after DNA extraction from paraffin blocks and using specific primers of the Parvovirus B19 VP1 gene. Apparent causes of hydrops were eliminated such as metabolic diseases, cardiac failure or malformation. The standard histological study objects viral inclusion in one case (lung tissue). However, the immunohistochemical study was negative in all cases. Nested-PCR demonstrates the presence of the viral DNA in five cases. Our study demonstrates that the implication of Parvovirus B19 in hydrops fetalis must be affirmed by the use of more than one method. Nested-PCR is the most sensitive method in our study and can be easily used for the detection of Parvovirus B19 in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

[Antihistones antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus, comparison of three assays: Elisa, dot blot and immunoblot]. / Anticorps antihistones au cours du lupus érythémateux systémique, comparaison entre trois techniques: Elisa, dot blot et immunotransfert.

AIMS: The purpose of our study is to determine and compare the sensitivity of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a dot blot assay and an immunoblot assay for the detection of the IgG class antihistones antibodies in a population of systemic lupus erythematosus. The correlation between antihistones antibodies and the main clinical features of SLE or between antihistones antibodies and the presence of anti-double-stranded-DNA antibodies were analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum samples from 126 systemic lupus erythematosus patients, classified according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology, were analysed for the presence of antihistones antibodies using a dot blot assay and an ELISA. Antihistones subfractions antibodies were assessed using the immunoblot technique on 88 out of the 126 sera. Serum samples from 50 blood-donors were analyzed as negative controls. RESULTS: The sensitivity of antihistones antibodies assessed by dot blot assay and ELISA was 69% and 54% respectively, and was lower than that of anti-double-stranded-DNA antibodies (83%). The sensitivity of the immunoblot assay for the detection of antihistones antibodies was 72%. Incidence of autoantibodies against histones H1, H2 A, H2B, H3 and H4 was 60%, 53%, 48%, 36% and 29.5% respectively. We found a correlation between the presence of antihistones antibodies, detected by the dot blot assay and ELISA, and the presence of anti-double-stranded-DNA antibodies. Antihistones antibodies detected by ELISA were correlated with renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus; they showed a specificity, a positive and a negative predictive value for renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus higher than those of anti-double-stranded-DNA antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the dot blot assay for the detection of antihistones antibodies is better than that of ELISA, but the latter technique could detect some cases negative by ELISA. Antihistones antibodies detected by ELISA have an important predictive value in the renal complications in systemic lupus erythematosus, better than that of AdsDNA. Antibodies to histone H1 were the most frequent antihistones autoandibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus and they were highly correlated with anti-double-stranded-DNA antibodies and renal disease.

Celiac disease in Tunisia: serological screening in healthy blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Recent epidemiological studies in Europe and in USA using antigliadin antibodies and antiendomysium antibodies for initial screening have shown that the overall prevalence of celiac disease (CD) is about 1:200 (0.5%). AIM: To screen for CD in healthy blood donors in Tunisia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sera from 2500 healthy blood donors (median age: 21 years, 70% men and 30% women) were screened for IgG-antigliadin antibodies and IgA-antigliadin antibodies with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All sera with positive antigliadin antibodies were tested for antiendomysium antibodies using human umbilical cord cryosections as substrate. RESULTS: Seven healthy blood donors (median age: 21 years; four men, three women) have antiendomysium antibodies. The prevalence of antiendomysium antibodies in healthy blood donors in Tunisia is 1:355 (0.28%). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a high specificity of the antiendomysium antibodies, it is likely that the seven blood donors identified in this study have CD. These data suggest that CD is frequent in Tunisia.

Tissue transglutaminase antibodies in celiac disease, comparison of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and a dot blot assay.

AIMS: The purpose of our study is to determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a dot blot assay for the detection of IgA class anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (IgA-AtTGA) and to compare these results with those of IgA class anti-endomysium antibodies (IgA-AEA), IgA class anti-reticulin antibodies (IgA-ARA) and IgA class anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA-AGA). PATIENTS: Serum samples from 143 patients (97 children, 46 adults) with untreated celiac disease (CD) confirmed by intestinal biopsy and 74 disease controls (64 children, 10 adults) were studied. Methods. - The anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies were detected by dot blot assay and an ELISA using guinea pig tissue transglutaminase (gp-tTG) as antigen. The anti-endomysium antibodies were detected by an indirect immunofluorescence technique on cryostat sections of human umbilical cord. The anti-reticulin antibodies were also investigated by indirect immunofluorescence on cryostat sections of kidney, liver and stomach of rat. The anti-gliadin antibodies were determined by an ELISA. RESULTS: The sensitivity of an ELISA for the detection of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies was 86% in children and 87% in adults and the sensitivity of dot blot assay was 57% in children and 54% in adults. The specificity of an ELISA and dot blot for the detection for anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies was, respectively, 96% and 88% lower than that of anti-endomysium antibodies (100%). The sensitivity of anti-gliadin antibodies was 97% in children and 91% in adults and their specificity was 85%. The sensitivity of anti-reticulin antibodies was 94% in children and 87% in adults. Their specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of an ELISA for the detection of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies were better than that of dot blot assay. However, this dot blot assay could screen four celiac patients who have not had anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies by an ELISA. The sensitivity of anti-endomysium antibodies was better than that of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, anti-reticulin antibodies and anti-gliadin antibodies but in children aged less than 2 years, the sensitivity of anti-gliadin antibodies was better than that of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies.