ABSTRACT
Hepatic metastases due to colorectal carcinoma have often been felt to preclude pulmonary metastasectomy. With the recent advances in surgical options, should patients with both liver and lung metastases be considered for surgical resection? The current study reviews the impact of such aggressive management on disease-free and overall survival (OS). The clinical course of 63 patients presenting with colorectal metastasis to the lung alone (group 1, n = 45) or combined hepatic and lung metastases (group 2, n = 18) were reviewed. All patients underwent complete resection of their lung metastases. Surgical control of hepatic tumor burden was achieved by tumor ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and/or resection. All patients in group 1 and group 2 were available for a mean follow-up of 27 and 24 months, respectively. The presence of hepatic metastases, the resectability of hepatic tumor burden, and the disease-free interval after pulmonary metastasectomy did not significantly influence survival. These findings demonstrate that aggressive surgical management of pulmonary metastases in the presence of liver metastases offers a similar benefit as compared to patients with pulmonary metastases alone. Therefore, hepatic metastatic disease does not preclude an attempt at pulmonary metastasectomy if hepatic metastases can be resected or remains responsive to therapy. Such an approach achieves comparable OS and mean survival when compared to pulmonary metastasectomy alone.
