Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 77(4): 1545-1558, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32894241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The widespread incidence and prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has prompted an urgent call for research to validate early detection cognitive screening and assessment. OBJECTIVE: Our primary research aim was to determine if selected MemTrax performance metrics and relevant demographics and health profile characteristics can be effectively utilized in predictive models developed with machine learning to classify cognitive health (normal versus MCI), as would be indicated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 259 neurology, memory clinic, and internal medicine adult patients recruited from two hospitals in China. Each patient was given the Chinese-language MoCA and self-administered the continuous recognition MemTrax online episodic memory test on the same day. Predictive classification models were built using machine learning with 10-fold cross validation, and model performance was measured using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Models were built using two MemTrax performance metrics (percent correct, response time), along with the eight common demographic and personal history features. RESULTS: Comparing the learners across selected combinations of MoCA scores and thresholds, Naïve Bayes was generally the top-performing learner with an overall classification performance of 0.9093. Further, among the top three learners, MemTrax-based classification performance overall was superior using just the top-ranked four features (0.9119) compared to using all 10 common features (0.8999). CONCLUSION: MemTrax performance can be effectively utilized in a machine learning classification predictive model screening application for detecting early stage cognitive impairment.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/classification , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Machine Learning/classification , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Models, Psychological , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Machine Learning/standards , Male , Mental Status and Dementia Tests/standards , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests/standards
2.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 70(1): 277-286, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31177223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Memory dysfunction is characteristic of aging and often attributed to Alzheimer's disease (AD). An easily administered tool for preliminary assessment of memory function and early AD detection would be integral in improving patient management. OBJECTIVE: Our primary aim was to utilize machine learning in determining initial viable models to serve as complementary instruments in demonstrating efficacy of the MemTrax online Continuous Recognition Tasks (M-CRT) test for episodic-memory screening and assessing cognitive impairment. METHODS: We used an existing dataset subset (n = 18,395) of demographic information, general health screening questions (addressing memory, sleep quality, medications, and medical conditions affecting thinking), and test results from a convenience sample of adults who took the M-CRT test. M-CRT performance and participant features were used as independent attributes: true positive/negative, percent responses/correct, response time, age, sex, and recent alcohol consumption. For predictive modeling, we used demographic information and test scores to predict binary classification of the health-related questions (yes/no) and general health status (healthy/unhealthy), based on the screening questions. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed significant differences among HealthQScore groups for response time true positive (p = 0.000) and true positive (p = 0.020), but none for true negative (p = 0.0551). Both % responses and % correct had significant differences (p = 0.026 and p = 0.037, respectively). Logistic regression was generally the top-performing learner with moderately robust prediction performance (AUC) for HealthQScore (0.648-0.680) and selected general health questions (0.713-0.769). CONCLUSION: Our novel application of supervised machine learning and predictive modeling helps to demonstrate and validate cross-sectional utility of MemTrax in assessing early-stage cognitive impairment and general screening for AD.


Subject(s)
Aging/psychology , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Cognition/physiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Dementia/diagnosis , Machine Learning , Memory, Episodic , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Databases, Factual , Dementia/psychology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Models, Psychological , Neuropsychological Tests
3.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 51(7): 1362-1371, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694980

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Concussion prevalence in sport is well recognized, so too is the challenge of clinical and return-to-play management for an injury with an inherent indeterminant time course of resolve. A clear, valid insight into the anticipated resolution time could assist in planning treatment intervention. PURPOSE: This study implemented a supervised machine learning-based approach in modeling estimated symptom resolve time in high school athletes who incurred a concussion during sport activity. METHODS: We examined the efficacy of 10 classification algorithms using machine learning for the prediction of symptom resolution time (within 7, 14, or 28 d), with a data set representing 3 yr of concussions suffered by high school student-athletes in football (most concussion incidents) and other contact sports. RESULTS: The most prevalent sport-related concussion reported symptom was headache (94.9%), followed by dizziness (74.3%) and difficulty concentrating (61.1%). For all three category thresholds of predicted symptom resolution time, single-factor ANOVA revealed statistically significant performance differences across the 10 classification models for all learners at a 95% confidence interval (P = 0.000). Naïve Bayes and Random Forest with either 100 or 500 trees were the top-performing learners with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve performance ranging between 0.656 and 0.742 (0.0-1.0 scale). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the limitations of these data specific to symptom presentation and resolve, supervised machine learning demonstrated efficacy, while warranting further exploration, in developing symptom-based prediction models for practical estimation of sport-related concussion recovery in enhancing clinical decision support.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Machine Learning , Adolescent , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Attention/physiology , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Clinical Decision-Making , Dizziness/etiology , Football/injuries , Headache/etiology , Humans , Return to Sport , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...