Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Nurs Outlook ; 71(3): 101960, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37004352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited on nurse staffing in maternity units. PURPOSE: To estimate the relationship between hospital characteristics and adherence with Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses nurse staffing guidelines. METHODS: We enrolled 3,471 registered nurses in a cross-sectional survey and obtained hospital characteristics from the 2018 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. We used mixed-effects linear regression models to estimate associations between hospital characteristics and staffing guideline adherence. FINDINGS: Overall, nurses reported strong adherence to AWHONN staffing guidelines (rated frequently or always met by ≥80% of respondents) in their hospitals. Higher birth volume, having a neonatal intensive care unit, teaching status, and higher percentage of births paid by Medicaid were all associated with lower mean guideline adherence scores. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Important gaps in staffing were reported more frequently at hospitals serving patients more likely to have medical or obstetric complications, leaving the most vulnerable patients at risk.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Workforce
2.
J Patient Saf ; 19(3): 166-172, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728161

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the association of nurses' perceptions of patient safety climate with missed nursing care in labor and delivery (L&D) units. METHODS: We recruited nurse respondents via email distribution of an electronic survey between February 2018 and July 2019. Hospitals with L&D units were recruited from states with projected availability of 2018 state inpatient data in the United States. Measures included the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire Safety Climate Subscale and the Perinatal Missed Care Survey. We estimated the relationship between safety climate and missed care using Kruskal-Wallis tests and mixed-effects linear regression. RESULTS: The analytic sample included 3429 L&D registered nurses from 253 hospitals (response rate, 35%). A majority of respondents (65.7%) reported a perception of good safety climate in their units, with a mean score of 4.12 (±0.73) out of 5. The mean number of aspects of care occasionally, frequently, or always missed on respondents' units was 11.04 (±6.99) out of 25. χ2 Tests showed that six mostly commonly missed aspects of care (e.g., timely documentation) and three reasons for missed care (communications, material resources, and labor resources) were associated with safety climate groups ( P < 0.001). The adjusted mixed-effects model identified a significant association between better nurse-perceived safety climate and less missed care ( ß = -2.65; 95% confidence interval, -2.97 to -2.34; P < 0.001) after controlling for years of experience and highest nursing education. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that improving safety climate-for example, through better teamwork and communication-may improve nursing care quality during labor and birth through decreasing missed nursing care. Conversely, it is also possible that strategies to reduce missed care-such as staffing improvements-may improve safety climate.


Subject(s)
Nursing Care , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Humans , Patient Safety , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Nurs Res ; 71(6): 432-440, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36075699

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nursing care is essential to overall quality of healthcare experienced by patients and families-especially during childbearing. However, evidence regarding quality of nursing care during labor and birth is lacking, and established nurse-sensitive outcome indicators have limited applicability to maternity care. Nurse-sensitive outcomes need to be established for maternity care, and prior research suggests that the initiation of human milk feeding during childbirth hospitalization is a potentially nurse-sensitive outcome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between nurse-reported staffing, missed nursing care during labor and birth, and exclusive breast milk feeding during childbirth hospitalization as a nurse-sensitive outcome. METHODS: 2018 Joint Commission PC-05 Exclusive Breast Milk Feeding rates were linked to survey data from labor nurses who worked in a selected sample of hospitals with both PC-05 data and valid 2018 American Hospital Association Annual Survey data. Nurse-reported staffing was measured as the perceived compliance with Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses staffing guidelines by the labor and delivery unit. Data from the nurse survey were aggregated to the hospital level. Bivariate linear regression was used to determine associations between nurse and hospital characteristics and exclusive breast milk feeding rates. Generalized structural equation modeling was used to model relationships between nurse-reported staffing, nurse-reported missed care, and exclusive breast milk feeding at the hospital level. RESULTS: The sample included 184 hospitals in 29 states and 2,691 labor nurses who worked day, night, or evening shifts. Bivariate analyses demonstrated a positive association between nurse-reported staffing and exclusive breast milk feeding and a negative association between missed nursing care and exclusive breast milk feeding. In structural equation models controlling for covariates, missed skin-to-skin mother-baby care and missed breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth mediated the relationship between nurse-reported staffing and exclusive breast milk feeding rates. DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence that hospitals' nurse-reported compliance with Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses staffing guidelines predicts hospital-exclusive breast milk feeding rates and that the rates are a nurse-sensitive outcome.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Infant, Newborn , United States , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Breast Feeding , Milk, Human , Workforce
5.
Nurs Womens Health ; 25(5): 329-336, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34602165

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To solicit advice from members of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) on what to include in an update of nurse staffing standards. DESIGN: Online, single-question survey with thematic analysis of responses. SETTING: Electronic survey link sent via e-mail. PARTICIPANTS: AWHONN members who shared their e-mail with the association and who responded to the survey (n = 1,813). MEASURES: Participants were asked to answer this single question: "The AWHONN (2010) Guidelines for Professional Registered Nurse Staffing for Perinatal Units are being updated. During their initial development, feedback from nearly 900 AWHONN members was extremely helpful in providing specific details for the nurse staffing guidelines. We'd really like to hear from you again. Please give the writing team your input. What should AWHONN consider when updating the AWHONN nurse staffing guidelines?" RESULTS: The e-mail was successfully delivered to 20,463 members; 8,050 opened the e-mail, and 3,050 opened the link to the survey. There were 1,892 responses. After removing duplicate and blank responses, 1,813 responses were available for analysis. They represented all hospital practice settings for maternity and newborn care and included nurses from small-volume and rural hospitals. Primary concerns of respondents centered on two aspects of patient acuity-the increasing complexity of clinical cases and the need to link nurse staffing standards to patient acuity. Other themes included maintaining current nurse-to-patient ratios, needing help with implementation in the context of economic challenges, and changing wording from "guidelines" to "standards" to promote widespread adoption. CONCLUSION: In a single-question survey, AWHONN members offered rich, detailed recommendations that were used in the updating of the AWHONN nurse staffing standards.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Nurses , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Workforce/standards , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Nursing , Nurse-Patient Relations , Parturition , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Pregnancy , Societies, Nursing
6.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs ; 45(5): 280-288, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32496351

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine associations between missed nursing care and nurse staffing during labor and birth, and exclusive breast milk feeding at hospital discharge. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Labor and birth nurses in three states were surveyed about missed nursing care and their maternity units' adherence to the AWHONN (2010) nurse staffing guidelines for care during labor and birth, using the Perinatal Misscare Survey. Nursing responses were aggregated to the hospital level and estimated associations between missed nursing care, nurse staffing, and hospitals' exclusive breast milk feeding rates were measured using The Joint Commission's Perinatal Care Measure (PC-05). RESULTS: Surveys from 512 labor nurses in 36 hospitals were included in the analysis. The mean exclusive breast milk feeding rate was 53% (range 13%-76%). Skin-to-skin care, breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth, and appropriate recovery care were on average occasionally missed (2.33 to 2.46 out of 4; 1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally, 3 = frequently, or 4 = always) and were associated with PC-05 [B(CI) -17.1(-29, -6.3), -17.9(-30.5, -6.2), and -15.4(-28.7, -2.1), respectively]. Adherence with overall staffing guidelines was associated with PC-05 [12.9(3.4, 24.3)]. Missed nursing care was an independent predictor of PC-05 [-14.6(-26.4, -2.7)] in a multilevel model adjusting for staffing guideline adherence, perceived quality, mean age of respondents, and nurse burnout. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Exclusive breast milk feeding is a national quality indicator of inpatient maternity care. Nurses have substantial responsibility for direct support of infant feeding during the childbirth hospitalization. These results support exclusive breast milk feeding (PC-05) as a nurse-sensitive quality indicator.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Labor, Obstetric , Nursing Care/standards , Adult , California , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Michigan , Milk, Human , New Jersey , Nursing Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Qual Health Res ; 30(3): 331-340, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31431141

ABSTRACT

Patient rescue occurs in phases: recognizing the problem, communicating the concern, and treating the complication. To help improve rescue, we sought to understand facilitators and barriers to managing postoperative complications. We used a criterion-based sample from a large academic medical center. Semistructured interviews (n = 57) were conducted, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis and consensus coding was performed using NVivo 11. We used a framework matrix approach to synthesize our coding and identify themes that facilitate or impede rescue. Clinicians identified root causes for delays in care, such as recognizing patient deterioration, knowing whom to contact and when, and reaching the correct decision-making provider. This study identified significant variation in communication processes across providers caring for surgical patients. Targeted interventions aimed at improving and standardizing these aspects of communication may significantly influence the ability to effectively identify and escalate care for postoperative complications.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Clinical Decision-Making , Failure to Rescue, Health Care , Health Personnel/psychology , Time-to-Treatment/organization & administration , Clinical Deterioration , Communication , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Qualitative Research , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Time Factors
8.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 48(4): 456-467, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31194934

ABSTRACT

Missed nursing care is an important measure of nursing care quality that is sensitive to nurse staffing and is associated with patient outcomes in medical-surgical and pediatric inpatient settings. Missed nursing care during labor and birth has not been studied, yet childbirth represents the most common reason for hospitalization in the United States. The Missed Nursing Care (MISSCARE) Survey, a measure of medical-surgical nursing quality with substantial evidence for validity and reliability, was adapted to maternity nursing care using data from focus groups of labor nurses, physicians, and new mothers and an online survey of labor nurses. Content validity was evaluated via participant feedback, and exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify the factor structure of the instrument. The modified version, the Perinatal Missed Care Survey, appears to be a feasible and promising instrument with which to evaluate missed nursing care of women during labor and birth in hospitals.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Maternal-Child Nursing/organization & administration , Neonatal Nursing/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Needs Assessment , Nurse's Role , Pregnancy , Reproducibility of Results , United States
9.
Nurs Womens Health ; 23(3): 217-223, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31054831

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree to which registered nurses perceive their labor and delivery units to be adhering to Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) staffing guidelines. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study via an online survey of labor nurses recruited from hospitals in three states. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: In late 2016 and early 2017, labor nurses in selected hospitals in California, Michigan, and New Jersey were contacted via e-mail invitation to participate in a study about nursing care during labor and birth. Nurse leaders in each hospital facilitated the invitations. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 615 labor nurses from 67 hospitals. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Most nurses reported that the AWHONN nurse staffing guidelines were frequently or always followed in all aspects of care surveyed. Hospitals with annual birth volumes of 500 to 999 range were significantly more likely than hospitals with 2,500 or more annual births to be perceived as compliant with AWHONN staffing guidelines. CONCLUSION: When the AWHONN staffing guidelines were first published in 2010, there was concern among some nurse leaders that they would not be adopted into clinical practice, yet nurses in our sample overwhelmingly perceived their hospitals to be guideline compliant. There remains much more work to be done to determine nurse-sensitive outcomes for maternity care and to ensure that all women in labor in the United States are cared for by nurses who are not overburdened or distracted by being assigned more women than can be safely handled.


Subject(s)
Nurses/psychology , Perception , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/standards , Adult , Aged , California , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , New Jersey , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Nurses/supply & distribution , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
10.
Implement Sci ; 11(1): 147, 2016 11 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27814722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation framework, a National Institutes of Health-sponsored study compared the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention to usual care. A prior paper describes the effectiveness of the Tobacco Tactics intervention. This subsequent paper provides data describing the remaining constructs of the RE-AIM framework. METHODS: This pragmatic study used a mixed methods, quasi-experimental design in five Michigan community hospitals of which three received the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention and two received usual care. Nurses and patients were surveyed pre- and post-intervention. Measures included reach (patient participation rates, characteristics, and receipt of services), adoption (nurse participation rates and characteristics), implementation (pre-to post-training changes in nurses' attitudes, delivery of services, barriers to implementation, opinions about training, documentation of services, and numbers of volunteer follow-up phone calls), and maintenance (continuation of the intervention once the study ended). RESULTS: Reach: Patient participation rates were 71.5 %. Compared to no change in the control sites, there were significant pre- to post-intervention increases in self-reported receipt of print materials in the intervention hospitals (n = 1370, p < 0.001). Adoption: In the intervention hospitals, all targeted units and several non-targeted units participated; 76.0 % (n = 1028) of targeted nurses and 317 additional staff participated in the training, and 92.4 % were extremely or somewhat satisfied with the training. IMPLEMENTATION: Nurses in the intervention hospitals reported increases in providing advice to quit, counseling, medications, handouts, and DVD (all p < 0.05) and reported decreased barriers to implementing smoking cessation services (p < 0.001). Qualitative comments were very positive ("user friendly," "streamlined," or "saves time"), although problems with showing patients the DVD and charting in the electronic medical record were noted. Maintenance: Nurses continued to provide the intervention after the study ended. CONCLUSIONS: Given that nurses represent the largest group of front-line providers, this intervention, which meets Joint Commission guidelines for treating inpatient smokers, has the potential to have a wide reach and to decrease smoking, morbidity, and mortality among inpatient smokers. As we move toward more population-based interventions, the RE-AIM framework is a valuable guide for implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01309217.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking , Nursing Care/methods , Smoking Prevention/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Counseling , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Health Promotion/methods , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Nurses' , Smoking Cessation/methods , Telemedicine/methods
11.
Trials ; 13: 125, 2012 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22852834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this smoking cessation study among hospitalized smokers are to: 1) determine provider and patient receptivity, barriers, and facilitators to implementing the nurse-administered, inpatient Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care using face-to-face feedback and surveys; 2) compare the effectiveness of the nurse-administered, inpatient Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care across hospitals, units, and patient characteristics using thirty-day point prevalence abstinence at thirty days and six months (primary outcome) post-recruitment; and 3) determine the cost-effectiveness of the nurse-administered, inpatient Tobacco Tactics intervention relative to usual care including cost per quitter, cost per life-year saved, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved. METHODS/DESIGN: This effectiveness study will be a quasi-experimental design of six Michigan community hospitals of which three will get the nurse-administered Tobacco Tactics intervention and three will provide their usual care. In both the intervention and usual care sites, research assistants will collect data from patients on their smoking habits and related variables while in the hospital and at thirty days and six months post-recruitment. The intervention will be integrated into the experimental sites by a research nurse who will train Master Trainers at each intervention site. The Master Trainers, in turn, will teach the intervention to all staff nurses. Research nurses will also conduct formative evaluation with nurses to identify barriers and facilitators to dissemination.Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the results of surveys administered to nurses, nurses' participation rates, smokers' receipt of specific cessation services, and satisfaction with services. General estimating equation analyses will be used to determine differences between intervention groups on satisfaction and quit rates, respectively, with adjustment for the clustering of patients within hospital units. Regression analyses will test the moderation of the effects of the interventions by patient characteristics. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed by constructing three ratios including cost per quitter, cost per life-year saved, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved. DISCUSSION: Given that nurses represent the largest group of front-line providers, this intervention, if proven effective, has the potential for having a wide reach and thus decrease smoking, morbidity and mortality among inpatient smokers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dissemination of Tobacco Tactics for Hospitalized Smokers NCT01309217.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols , Nurses , Smoking Cessation/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling , Humans , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Smoking Cessation/economics
12.
J Adv Nurs ; 65(7): 1509-17, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19456994

ABSTRACT

AIM: This paper is a report of the analysis of the concept of missed nursing care. BACKGROUND: According to patient safety literature, missed nursing care is an error of omission. This concept has been conspicuously absent in quality and patient safety literature, with individual aspects of nursing care left undone given only occasional mention. METHOD: An 8-step method of concept analysis - select concept, determine purpose, identify uses, define attributes, identify model case, describe related and contrary cases, identify antecedents and consequences and define empirical referents - was used to examine the concept of missed nursing care. The sources for the analysis were identified by systematic searches of the World Wide Web, MEDLINE, CINAHL and reference lists of related journal articles with a timeline of 1970 to April 2008. FINDINGS: Missed nursing care, conceptualized within the Missed Nursing Care Model, is defined as any aspect of required patient care that is omitted (either in part or in whole) or delayed. Various attribute categories reported by nurses in acute care settings contribute to missed nursing care: (1) antecedents that catalyse the need for a decision about priorities; (2) elements of the nursing process and (3) internal perceptions and values of the nurse. Multiple elements in the nursing environment and internal to nurses influence whether needed nursing care is provided. CONCLUSION: Missed care as conceptualized within the Missed Care Model is a universal phenomenon. The concept is expected to occur across all cultures and countries, thus being international in scope.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Nursing Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Safety Management/standards , Decision Making , Humans
13.
Lippincotts Case Manag ; 9(1): 21-6, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15076834

ABSTRACT

This study focused on case management by examining the relationships between congestive heart failure patient outcomes and nurse structure and process variables. A correlational design with retrospective analysis of data from 175 randomly selected acute care patients was used. The amount of education provided by the nurses on the unit was positively correlated with the degree of pathway completion (r=.32, p =.000) and negatively correlated with the readmissions (r = -.27, p =.000). The degree of completion of the clinical pathway had no effect on length of stay (LOS) but was negatively correlated to readmission rate (r =-.53, p =.000) and positively correlated to hospital days (r =.21, p =.000). Case Management was positively correlated with LOS (r =.41, p =.000) but negatively correlated with hospital days and readmissions, (r = -22, p =.000; r = -.29, p =.000, respectively). No relationships were found between RN hours and LOS or readmissions. The implications of these findings for case managers and nurse administrators are discussed.


Subject(s)
Case Management/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Acute Disease , Heart Failure , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Models, Organizational , Nurse's Role , Nursing Assessment/organization & administration , Nursing Evaluation Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies , Workload
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...