A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Apatorsen or Placebo in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The RAINIER Trial.

LESSONS LEARNED: The addition of the heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27)-targeting antisense oligonucleotide, apatorsen, to a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen did not result in improved survival in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.Findings from this trial hint at the possible prognostic and predictive value of serum Hsp27 that may warrant further investigation. BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blinded, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus either apatorsen, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) mRNA, or placebo in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to Arm A (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus apatorsen) or Arm B (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus placebo). Treatment was administered in 28-day cycles, with restaging every 2 cycles, until progression or intolerable toxicity. Serum Hsp27 levels were analyzed at baseline and on treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled, 66 per arm. Cytopenias and fatigue were the most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events for both arms. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 2.7 and 5.3 months, respectively, for arm A, and 3.8 and 6.9 months, respectively, for arm B. Objective response rate was 18% for both arms. Patients with high serum level of Hsp27 represented a poor-prognosis subgroup who may have derived modest benefit from addition of apatorsen. CONCLUSION: Addition of apatorsen to chemotherapy does not improve outcomes in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in the first-line setting, although a trend toward prolonged PFS and OS in patients with high baseline serum Hsp27 suggests this therapy may warrant further evaluation in this subgroup.

A Phase 2 Study of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Ziv-Aflibercept, and Radiation for the Preoperative and Adjuvant Treatment of Patients with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study combined aflibercept with preoperative chemoradiation for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer, followed by mFOLFOX6/aflibercept. METHODS: Patients received preoperative 5-FU (days 1-43), radiation (weeks 1-6), and aflibercept (days 1-15) each 28 day cycle for 6 weeks. Six weeks following the last aflibercept dose, patients underwent surgical resection. Four cycles of mFOLFOX6 plus aflibercept began 8 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Common treatment-related toxicities included diarrhea, fatigue, and mucositis. The pCR rate was 23%. DISCUSSION: Afilbercept plus 5-FU-based chemoradiation was tolerated in patients with localized rectal cancer and showed a pCR rate within range of historical data.

A Phase-2 Trial of Single Agent Axitinib as Maintenance Therapy Following First-Line Treatment With Modified FOLFOX/Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

This phase-2 trial evaluated the efficacy of axitinib as maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following first-line treatment with FOLFOX/bevacizumab. Patients with mCRC received mFOLFOX/bevacizumab followed by axitinib maintenance after four cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Seventy patients were enrolled. Common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and peripheral neuropathy during FOLFOX/bevacizumab treatment; and fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, and peripheral neuropathy during axitinib treatment. Median PFS was 8.3 months. Treatment with FOLFOX/bevacizumab followed by maintenance axitinib as first-line treatment for mCRC produced a median PFS consistent with historical controls of other first-line regimens.

A Phase 2 Study of the Hsp90 Inhibitor AUY922 as Treatment for Patients with Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

BACKGROUND: AUY922 is an inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). Hsp90 inhibitors induce kit degradation in preclinical gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) models. This trial was designed to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with GIST refractory to or intolerant of imatinib and sunitinib. METHODS: Eligible patients received AUY922 70 mg/mg(2) by intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Between December 2011 and January 2015, 25 patients were enrolled (median age, 63 years; 56% male) and received a median of 2 cycles (range: 1-12) of AUY922 treatment. Thirty-four patients were planned, but enrollment was stopped early due to slow accrual. Median PFS was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.5, 5.3) and median OS was 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.2, 16.7). Radiographic response was evaluated in 21 patients; one patient achieved PR (4%) with another 15 having best response of stable disease (60%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (60% all grades). Reversible ocular toxicities that resulted in drug hold (24%) or reduction (8%) were also observed. CONCLUSION: AUY922 produced a median PFS which compares favorably to historical controls of placebo (6 weeks) for patients refractory to treatment with imatinib. While diarrhea and ocular toxicities were common, the majority of patients received treatment until disease progression.

Panitumumab, Gemcitabine, and Carboplatin as Treatment for Women With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Sarah Cannon Research Institute Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype with poor prognosis, and treatment options are limited to chemotherapy. Because the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in up to 70% of these tumors, this phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin as first- or second-line treatment for metastatic TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult women with metastatic TNBC with a maximum of 1 previous chemotherapy regimen were eligible. Patients received gemcitabine intravenous (I.V.) 1500 mg/m2, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve = 2.5 I.V., and panitumumab 6 mg/kg I.V. every 2 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with disease evaluations every 6 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Archival tissue was collected for correlative analysis, to include phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, p53, phosphatase and tensin homolog, EGFR, and status. RESULTS: Between May 2010 and August 2012, 71 women (median age, 54 years; 14% de novo stage IV) were treated. At a median follow-up of 11 months, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval, 3.2-5.5 months). The objective response rate was 42% (complete response, 1; partial response, 29). Treatment-related toxicity included: rash, 50 patients (70%), fatigue, 37 patients (52%), neutropenia, 32 patients (45%; 2 episodes of febrile neutropenia), and thrombocytopenia, 32 patients (45%). CONCLUSION: Although the addition of panitumumab was feasible, the results of this trial do not support combination of panitumumab with gemcitabine and carboplatin in the treatment of patients with TNBC.

A Phase II Study of the Combination of Bevacizumab, Pertuzumab, and Octreotide LAR for Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Cancers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of bevacizumab, pertuzumab, and octreotide depot for advanced neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: Patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and pertuzumab 420 mg IV q21 days with octreotide depot 30 mg IM q28 days. RESULTS: Toxicities in 43 patients included diarrhea (63%), fatigue (63%), hypertension (44%), and nausea (44%). Reversible G3 hypertension (26%) and LVEF decline (9%) occurred. 7/43 patients achieved objective response (typical carcinoid, 5; pancreatic NET, 2). Median PFS and OS were 6.5 and 26.4 months, respectively. DISCUSSION: Bevacizumab, pertuzumab, and octreotide depot was well-tolerated with a 16% ORR. Results in the well-differentiated carcinoid tumors are thought provoking.

A Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab Followed by Evaluation for Resection in Patients With Metastatic KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases Only.

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for potentially curative resection may become resectable with more aggressive chemotherapy regimens. In this nonrandomized trial, we evaluated folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor panitumumab as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type mCRC with liver-only metastasis. METHODS: Patients received FOLFOXIRI (5-FU, 3,200 mg/m(2), 48-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion; leucovorin, 200 mg/m(2) i.v.; irinotecan, 125 mg/m(2); oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m(2) i.v.) and panitumumab (6 mg/kg i.v.) on day 1 of 14-day cycles. Patients were restaged and evaluated for surgery every four cycles. Planned enrollment was originally 49 patients. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (median age: 55 years; 87% male) received a median 6 cycles of treatment (range: 1-33 cycles); 10 patients (67%) were surgical candidates at baseline. Twelve patients were evaluable for clinical response; 9 (60%) achieved partial response. Ten patients underwent surgery; all were complete resections and pathologic partial response. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea (33%) and rash (20%). Enrollment was halted because of emerging data on expanded KRAS/NRAS mutations beyond the region we initially examined, and the potential for negative interaction with oxaliplatin-based therapy. Eight patients underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis outside exon 2; no additional mutations were found. CONCLUSION: KRAS/NRAS mutations outside the region tested in this study were recently shown to be associated with inferior survival on similar treatment regimens. Therefore, this trial was stopped early. This regimen remains a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC in the KRAS/NRAS wild-type population. Enrollment criteria on future studies should include testing for the newly identified mutations.

A Phase I Study of the Hsp90 Inhibitor AUY922 plus Capecitabine for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 with capecitabine in advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) PO BID was administered with escalating doses of AUY922 IV; the MTD of AUY922 was combined with capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (DL6). RESULTS: 23 patients were treated at 5 dose levels (22 mg/m(2)-70 mg/m(2)). No DLTs were observed until DL6 (grade 3 diarrhea). Reversible vision darkening was seen in 26%. Four patients had partial response; 2 previously progressed on fluorouracil. Eight patients had stable disease (median 25.5 weeks). CONCLUSION: AUY922 plus capecitabine was well-tolerated up to 70 mg/m(2) with encouraging preliminary efficacy.

A phase 1 study of the sachet formulation of the oral dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 given twice daily (BID) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Introduction The PI3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is a commonly dysregulated pathway in cancers and is an attractive target for antitumor therapy. BEZ235 is a potent, highly specific and selective dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor. Methods Patients were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BEZ235 when administered twice-daily as an oral sachet. For intrapatient PK comparison, patients were to receive a lead in of the total daily dose in a QD schedule for the first 8 days of the initial 28 day cycle. Patients continued treatment until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. Results Thirty-three patients received BEZ235. Initial dose levels of 200 and 400 mg BID had no DLTs. At the 600 mg BID dose level with 1200 mg QD lead in dose two DLTs of grade 3 mucositis occurred early in the first treatment cycle, the lead-in QD dosing was eliminated. Fatigue and mucositis limited dosing at 600 mg BID in subsequent patients. The 400 mg BID dose level was re-explored, with DLTs of grade 3 hyperglycemia, dehydration, fatigue, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Twelve patients were enrolled at an intermediate dose of 300 mg BID; a grade 3 mucositis DLT was reported in 1 patient, and this dose was declared the MTD. Preliminary PK data demonstrate a consistent increase in PK parameters (Cmax and AUC) with dose level compared to QD dosing. Fifteen patients experienced stable disease as their best response, including 10 (colorectal [4 patients], endometrial [3 patients], carcinoid NOS, pancreas, and melanoma) who had disease control for ≥16 weeks. Conclusions The recommended dose of BEZ235 administered BID as an oral sachet formulation is 300 mg BID. Toxicities seen have been reported for other dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors.

A phase Ib study of linsitinib (OSI-906), a dual inhibitor of IGF-1R and IR tyrosine kinase, in combination with everolimus as treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of linsitinib (OSI-906), a dual inhibitor of IGFR and IR tyrosine kinase activity, and everolimus as treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Eligible adult patients with refractory mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate end-organ function received escalating doses of OSI-906 and everolimus in a 3 + 3 design. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with response evaluations every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with metastatic CRC were treated. There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first dose level (DL, OSI-906 50 mg BID; everolimus 5 mg QD). At DL2 (OSI-906 100 mg BID; everolimus 10 mg QD, n =6), three patients had DLTs considered related to everolimus (grade 3 mucositis, 2; grade 3 thrombocytopenia, 1). An amendment introduced DL2a (OSI-906 100 mg BID; everolimus 5 mg QD, n =5); DLTs were seen in two patients (one patient each: grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; inability to receive 75 % of doses due to neutropenia/thrombocytopenia). DL1 was the MTD; a total of 7 patients were treated at this dose. Common adverse events across all DLs included grade 1/2 fatigue (50 %) and anorexia (50 %). There were no objective responses to treatment; median time of study treatment was 7.6 weeks (range: 3.9-53 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of OSI-906 and everolimus was 50 mg BID and 5 mg QD, respectively. No indications of clinical activity were observed in refractory mCRC patients.

Lenalidomide in combination with gemcitabine as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas: a Sarah Cannon Research Institute phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 6-mo overall survival, safety and tolerability of lenalidomide in combination with standard gemcitabine as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Eligibility included: previously untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with metastases incurable by surgery/radiation therapy; ECOG PS 0-2; adequate organ function; prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Patients received lenalidomide 25 mg PO (days 1-21) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m ( 2) IV (days 1, 8 and 15) each 28-day cycle, with response evaluations every eight weeks. RESULTS: Between 5/2009-4/2010, 72 patients (median age 64 years; 68% male; 42% ECOG PS 0) were enrolled in this multicenter, community-based study. Six-month OS was 37% (95% CI 26-48%). Median PFS and OS were 2.3 (95% CI 1.9-3.5) and 4.7 (95% CI 3.4-5.7) months, respectively. Eight partial responses (11%) were documented. Thirty-nine patients (54%) experienced thrombocytopenia (2 patients, 3% grade 4). Hematologic toxicities resulted in dose modifications for the majority of patients. Twenty patients (28%) developed VTEs during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The observed 6-month OS (37%) of lenalidomide with gemcitabine does not suggest improvement compared with historical results with gemcitabine alone. Toxicities and dose modifications likely limited dose intensity. Further development of this regimen in pancreas cancer is not recommended.

A drug interaction study evaluating the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of sorafenib in combination with capecitabine.

PURPOSE: To address tolerability and a possible pharmacologic interaction of capecitabine with sorafenib. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors (ECOG PS 0-1) were included. Cohort A received capecitabine 750 mg/m(2) BID and Cohort B received capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) BID, both for 14 days of a 21-day cycle. Steady-state PK was obtained for capecitabine alone, sorafenib alone, and in combination. Cohort C explored an alternate schedule of 7-day on/7-day off flat dose capecitabine 1,000 mg BID with continuous dosing of sorafenib 400 mg BID. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled between February 08 and April 09. Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) was the primary toxicity with 16 (50%) of the 32 patients experiencing grade 3 events (75% occurring during cycles 1-2). Grade 3 HFSR defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Cohort C at 1,000 mg BID flat dose of capecitabine. Other grade 3/4 toxicities were rare (diarrhea 6%, mucositis 3%, and fatigue 3%). Capecitabine did not change the C (max) or AUC((0-12)) of sorafenib. Co-administration of sorafenib with capecitabine 750 mg/m(2) (n = 6 patients) increased capecitabine AUC((0-12)) 15% and produced no change in the 5FU AUC((0-12)). At the capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) dose level (n = 12 pts), there was a 16% increase in capecitabine AUC((0-12)) and an 8% increase in 5FU AUC((0-12)). However, these trends were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of sorafenib resulted in a mild increase in capecitabine AUC, although not statistically significant. Capecitabine did not affect the exposure of sorafenib. The rate of grade 3 HFSR is concerning and limits the feasibility of prolonged dosing of sorafenib with capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on the 21-day schedule.

Phase II trial of FOLFOX6, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine FOLFOX/bevacizumab/cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). DESIGN: Randomized phase II trial aimed at achieving a 60% objective response rate (ORR). Due to frequent cetuximab-related hypersensitivity reactions the trial was amended to a single-arm design. Eligibility: Previously untreated mCRC, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0-1. TREATMENT: Modified FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 350 mg, and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² bolus; 2.4 g/m² infusion, 46 h) day 1; bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on day 1; cetuximab 400 mg/m² on day 1, then 250 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, every 14 days (1 cycle) until progressive disease (PD); restaging occurred every 4 cycles. RESULTS: With emerging negative progression-free survival (PFS) data from a similarly designed trial, this trial closed early. Enrollment (N=31) was from August 2005-June 2008. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Median age was 55 years (29-78); 58% were male; 71% were ECOG-PS 0. Ten cycles (median) were completed (range 2-62). The ORR was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36-73%); 11 patients (35%) had stable disease; 1 patient (3%) had PD; 2 patients (6%) were unevaluable. Median PFS was 9 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.2 months); median overall survival was 25.7 months (95% CI, 15.4-27.6 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities (>1 patient) included neutropenia (25%), rash (23%; grade 2 events, 45%), diarrhea (19%), fatigue (16%), pain (16%), anemia (13%), sensory neuropathy (13%), deep-vein thrombosis (10%), nausea (10%), pulmonary embolism (7%), anorexia (6%), and vomiting (6%). CONCLUSION: In this limited trial, it is unclear whether cetuximab contributed to FOLFOX/bevacizumab efficacy, although the response rate, PFS, and overall survival were high. The regimen was generally well-tolerated, with expected skin effects; thromboembolic rates should be assessed in larger analyses. Cetuximab's role in first-line mCRC treatment is likely best guided by K-RAS testing in future clinical trials.

A phase II trial of dose-dense neoadjuvant gemcitabine, epirubicin, and albumin-bound paclitaxel with pegfilgrastim in the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane combinations, with or without gemcitabine, produce pathologic complete responses (pCRs) in 15%-25% of patients. In this multicenter phase II study, we attempted to increase efficacy and decrease toxicity of a 3-drug gemcitabine-containing neoadjuvant regimen by administering dose-dense therapy with pegfilgrastim, and including albumin-bound paclitaxel as the taxane. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 123 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated with 6 doses of neoadjuvant gemcitabine 2000 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, and albumin-bound paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously administered at 14-day intervals. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients underwent either mastectomy or breast conservation surgery; pathologic response to treatment was assessed. Postoperatively, patients received 4 doses of gemcitabine 2000 mg/m2 with albumin-bound paclitaxel 220 mg/m2 at 14-day intervals. Pegfilgrastim 6 mg was administered subcutaneously on day 2 following each dose of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (95%) completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had subsequent surgical resection. Twenty-three patients (20%) had a pCR. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 48% and 86%, respectively. Neoadjuvant treatment was well tolerated; only 11% of the patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, with 1 episode of neutropenic fever. Other grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in < 10% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant biweekly chemotherapy with gemcitabine/epirubicin/albumin-bound paclitaxel with pegfilgrastim is feasible and well tolerated. The pCR rate of 20% and the 3-year PFS rate of 48% are similar to results achieved with other commonly used neoadjuvant regimens.

Phase II trial of vinflunine in relapsed small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vinflunine is a new microtubule inhibitor with preclinical activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this phase II trial, we evaluated vinflunine in patients with relapse-sensitive and refractory SCLC. METHODS: This trial aimed to achieve a 20% objective response rate (ORR) in platinum-sensitive patients. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2 and measurable disease received vinflunine (320 mg/m(2) IV) every 21 days (< or =6 cycles; response evaluation every 6 weeks). RESULTS: Patient characteristics (N = 51): median age 63 years (range, 37-85 years); male, 55%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2, 16%; relapse-sensitive SCLC, 53%. The overall ORR was 19.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10-33%). Twelve (23.5%) patients had stable disease; 18 (35.3%) patients had progressive disease. Among relapse-sensitive patients, ORR was 22.2% (95% CI 9-42%). Among relapse-refractory patients, ORR was 16.7% (95% CI 5-37%). Median follow-up was 15 months (range, 12-18 months); median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.6 months (95% CI 1.3-3.9 months); median overall survival (OS) was 4.9 months (95% CI 3.2- 6.5 months). Among relapse-sensitive patients, PFS and OS were 1.6 and 4.9 months, respectively. Among relapsed-refractory patients, PFS and OS were 1.4 and 4.0 months, respectively. In general, vinflunine was well tolerated, although neutropenia was a notable toxicity. Grade 3/4 toxicities (>5%): neutropenia (32%), arthralgia/myalgia (16%), fatigue (16%), hyponatremia (12%), leukopenia (12%), nausea/vomiting (12%), constipation (6%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). The rates of toxicities were relatively well balanced among relapse-sensitive and refractory patients; one patient died of sepsis that was possibly treatment related. CONCLUSIONS: Vinflunine has activity in relapsed SCLC, including refractory relapsed patients. Neutropenia was common but associated with rare febrile episodes. Additional study in relapse-refractory SCLC is indicated.

Bevacizumab and everolimus in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: a phase 2 trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium.

BACKGROUND: In this phase 2 study, the activity and tolerability of the combination of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of angiogenesis, and everolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), was evaluated in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Patients with metastatic melanoma who had received up to 2 previous systemic regimens (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy) were eligible. Previous treatment with angiogenesis or mTOR inhibitors was not allowed. All patients received bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days and everolimus at a dose of 10 mg orally daily. Patients were re-evaluated every 6 weeks; those with an objective response or stable disease (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) continued therapy until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with metastatic melanoma received a median of 4 treatment cycles (range, 1-14+ cycles). Seven patients (12%) achieved major responses, whereas 33 patients (58%) were found to have stable disease at the time of first evaluation. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 4 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Approximately 43% of patients were alive after 12 months of follow-up. The treatment regimen was well tolerated by the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of bevacizumab and everolimus was found to have moderate activity and was well tolerated in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Further exploration of agents with these mechanisms of action is indicated, perhaps in combination with inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.

Phase II study of cetuximab, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Targeting epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) has been a novel strategy in treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This multicenter, community-based trial was designed to examine the role of cetuximab in combination with a nonplatinum regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria were newly diagnosed unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC, all histologies, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2. Treatment premedication included dexamethasone 20 mg orally 12 and 6 hours before treatment, and 4 mg 12 hours following treatment; diphenhydramine 50 mg intravenously (I.V.) and cimetidine 300 mg I.V. before cetuximab. Treatment medication included docetaxel 30 mg/m2 I.V. days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 I.V. days 1 and 8; and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 I.V. day 1, then 250 mg/m2 I.V. weekly. Patients received up to 6 cycles with restaging every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was an overall response rate (ORR) > or = 25%. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients enrolled from July 2005 to October 2007. Patients had a median age of 69 years; 70% were male and 30% were female; ECOG PS was 0 in 42%, 1 in 51%, and 2 in 7%; patients had adenocarcinoma (42%), squamous cell (30%), large cell (6%), mixed (1%), and not otherwise specified (20%) disease. The ORR was 17% (95% CI, 9%-29%). Thirty-five patients (54%) had stable disease; 14 patients (22%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 17.8 months, the median progression-free and overall survivals were 4 months and 9.4 months, respectively. The most common (> 10%) grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (25%), rash (22%), and fatigue (12%). Accrual in our middle Tennessee offices was temporarily suspended and ultimately stopped because of a higher-than-anticipated rate of cetuximab-related severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in 4 patients among the first 12 enrolled, including 1 fatal event. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab/docetaxel/gemcitabine was relatively well-tolerated and associated with efficacy similar to chemotherapy alone. Additional study with cetuximab/chemotherapy in NSCLC should focus on new potentially predictive biomarkers. Also, additional study is needed to better understand and prevent the severe HSRs that appear to be endemic to specific regions of the United States.

Phase I/II trial of preoperative oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is a primary treatment option for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Combination regimens using newer agents may improve patient outcomes. This multicenter community-based phase I/II trial examined a modern triplet regimen comprised of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine (ODC) combined with radiation therapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary end point was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Eligibility criteria included resectable stage I to III cancer of the mid-/distal-esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1. Treatment included oxaliplatin 40 mg/m(2), docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) (intravenous, weekly x 5); capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1 to 7, 15 to 21, and 29 to 35; and concurrent RT (45 Gy). Resection was performed during weeks 9 to 12. ODC and RT safety was determined in a phase I portion (n = 10) preceding phase II. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled (September 2005 to February 2008; phase I/cohort 1, 10 patients; phase I/cohort 2/phase II, 49 patients). Baseline characteristics included median age of 63 years; 84% male; ECOG PS 0 and 1, 51% and 49%, respectively; adenocarcinoma and squamous cell, 69% and 18%, respectively; stage I, II, and III, 12%, 41%, and 45%, respectively. Phase I revealed no dose-limiting toxicity. Responses: pCR rate, 49%; objective response rate, 61% (24 complete and six partial responses); stable disease, 6%; and progressive disease, 2%. Sixty-nine percent of patients underwent surgery. Survival: median follow-up, 116 weeks; median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.3 and 24.1 months, respectively. Two-year DFS and OS were 45.1% and 52.2%, respectively. Most common (>or= 5%) grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were anorexia (20%), dehydration (16%), diarrhea (8%), dysphagia (10%), esophagitis (20%), fatigue (12%), hyperglycemia (6%), nausea (16%), pulmonary symptoms (14%), sepsis (6%), and vomiting (16%). All other grade 3 to 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon (< 5%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative ODC plus RT is active and relatively safe in patients with locoregional esophageal cancer. Importantly, this therapy can be administered within 8 weeks. This regimen warrants additional study in this setting and in combination with newer biologic agents.

Paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide versus gemcitabine/irinotecan in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a randomized, phase III Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of empiric first-line therapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide (PCE) versus gemcitabine/irinotecan, both followed by single-agent gefitinib, in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated carcinoma of unknown primary site were randomized to receive either PCE or gemcitabine/irinotecan. Responding and stable patients continued treatment for 4 to 6 cycles. Patients with no evidence of tumor progression at that time received single-agent gefitinib until tumor progression. The trial was designed to detect an improvement in the 2-year survival rate from 20% to 30%. RESULTS: Between September 2003 and July 2008, 198 patients entered this multicenter, community-based trial. Because of slow accrual, the trial was stopped short of its target accrual of 320 patients. Clinical characteristics were comparable for patients receiving PCE (N = 93) and gemcitabine/irinotecan (N = 105). PCE and gemcitabine/irinotecan produced similar 2-year survival (15% vs. 18%), median survival (7.4 months vs. 8.5 months), median progression-free survival (3.3 months vs. 5.3 months), and response rate (18% vs. 18%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and red blood cells transfusions were more common with PCE; diarrhea was more common with gemcitabine/irinotecan. The median duration of gefitinib maintenance was 3 months, suggesting no role as a maintenance therapy in this setting. DISCUSSION: The PCE and gemcitabine/irinotecan regimens have comparable efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Gemcitabine/irinotecan is the preferable regimen, due to its favorable toxicity profile. However, the moderate efficacy of both regimens underscores the need for novel treatment approaches in this patient population.

Single agent vinflunine in the salvage treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a phase II trial of the Sarah Cannon research consortium.

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer resistant to hormones and docetaxel were treated with vinflunine (320 mg/m(2) every 21 days), a new vinca alkaloid with improved preclinical activity. Only 1 of 36 patients (3%) had partial response; the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months. Treatment was well tolerated, with myelosuppression as the only frequent toxicity. Vinflunine has a low level of activity in the treatment of refractory metastatic prostate cancer, and should not be further developed for this indication.