ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Infusion reactions have been associated with infliximab therapy, but no study has assessed how physicians treat and manage this common adverse event. GOALS: To determine how gastroenterologists manage infusion reactions, identify prophylactic pretreatment protocols, and determine infliximab treatment persistence in the presence of infusion reactions. METHOD: This retrospective multicenter chart review analyzed data from adults younger than 90 years at the time of their first infliximab infusion from 9 academic or community-based gastroenterology practices. Infusion reaction rates were compared using a Chi-square test with Yates' correction. Kaplan-Meier methods assessed infliximab treatment persistency. RESULTS: Among 6,468 infusions with known infusion reaction status administered to 447 patients, 3.5% (226/6,468) of infusions resulted in an infusion reaction, and less than 0.1% (2/6,468) were associated with a serious infusion reaction. Among all patients, 19.7% (88/447) experienced at least 1 infusion reaction, whereas 0.4% (2/447) experienced a serious infusion reaction. Patients receiving concomitant immunosuppressives had fewer infusion reactions compared to patients not receiving them (57/322 patients, 17.7% vs 31/125 patients, 24.8%; P=.118). The cumulative proportion of patients continuing infliximab therapy at 2, 4, and 5 years was 73%, 58%, and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of serious infusion reactions was low. In the overall experience observed in this clinical practice retrospective cohort, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of specific infusion reaction prophylactic measures. In spite of infusion reactions, the long-term infliximab treatment persistence rate was high.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Parenteral iron therapy is an accepted adjunctive management of anaemia in kidney disease. Newer agents may have fewer severe hypersensitivity adverse events (AE) compared with iron dextrans (ID). The rate of type 1 AE to iron sucrose (IS) and sodium ferric gluconate (SFG) relative to ID is unclear. We used the US Food and Drug Administration's Freedom of Information (FOI) surveillance database to compare the type 1 AE profiles for the three intravenous iron preparations available in the United States. METHODS: We tabulated reports received by the FOI database between January 1997 and September 2002, and calculated 100 mg dose equivalents for the treated population for each agent. We developed four clinical categories describing hypersensitivity AE (anaphylaxis, anaphylactoid reaction, urticaria and angioedema) and an algorithm describing anaphylaxis, for specific analyses. RESULTS: All-event reporting rates were 29.2, 10.5 and 4.2 reports/million 100 mg dose equivalents, while all-fatal-event reporting rates were 1.4, 0.6 and 0.0 reports/million 100 mg dose equivalents for ID, SFG and IS, respectively. ID had the highest reporting rates in all four clinical categories and the anaphylaxis algorithm. SFG had intermediate reporting rates for urticaria, anaphylactoid reaction and the anaphylaxis algorithm, and a zero reporting rate for the anaphylaxis clinical category. IS had either the lowest or a zero reporting rate in all clinical categories/algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm a higher risk for AE, especially serious type 1 reactions, with ID therapy than with newer intravenous iron products and also suggest that IS carries the lowest risk for hypersensitivity reactions.
