Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(6): 945-947, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36451287

ABSTRACT

We detected no correlation between standardized antimicrobial administration ratios (SAARs) and healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) rates in 102 acute-care Veterans Affairs medical centers over 16 months. SAARs may be useful for investigating trends in local antimicrobial use, but no ratio threshold demarcated HO-CDI risk.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Cross Infection , Veterans , Humans , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care
2.
Fed Pract ; 34(5): 40-43, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30766280

ABSTRACT

The use of a fracture risk assessment tool with and without bone mineral density testing effectively predicted the risk of osteoporotic fractures in male veteran patients.

3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 44(2): 249-56, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20103610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is an important marker for clinical outcomes and mortality in hospitalized patients. New national standards have been established emphasizing the importance of improving inpatient glycemic control in individuals with diabetes or new-onset hyperglycemia. Implementation of these new standards is complex and requires a multidisciplinary team approach. A basal-bolus insulin regimen approach has been shown to improve inpatient glycemic control. Few studies have been published regarding basal-bolus insulin protocol outcomes in the non-intensive care unit (ICU) setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a basal-bolus insulin protocol on inpatient glycemic control in a non-ICU setting, as measured by mean blood glucose and number of hypoglycemic episodes per patient admission. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted to compare blood glucose control pre- (October 2006-March 2007) and postprotocol (November 2007-January 2008) implementation. Inclusion criteria consisted of patient admission to a medical or surgical ward for at least 72 hours, with a diagnosis of diabetes, or presentation with 2 blood glucose readings greater than 180 mg/dL. Patients admitted to the ICU or those not admitted to a medical or surgical ward were excluded. RESULTS: Following protocol implementation, the mean +/- SD blood glucose level increased from 174 +/- 88 mg/dL to 188 +/- 95 mg/dL (p < 0.001) and the hypoglycemic incidents significantly decreased, from 1.11 to 0.51 events per patient admission (p < 0.0025). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, implementation of a basal-bolus insulin protocol significantly reduced hypoglycemic events; however, mean blood glucose values increased. These results suggest that a basal-bolus insulin protocol can reduce hypoglycemia; however, factors such as protocol compliance, barriers in overcoming the use of the traditional sliding scale insulin regimens, staff education, and change of work-flow habits can influence the overall efficacy and impact of a basal-bolus insulin protocol on inpatient glycemic control.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/drug effects , Hyperglycemia/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, Veterans , Humans , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Hypoglycemia/epidemiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Insulin/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 39(1): 86-94, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15562139

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy of macrolides and tetracyclines in several chronic inflammatory conditions. DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE (1966-March 2004) and an extensive bibliography search were undertaken. Key terms included acne, blepharitis, cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis, periodontitis, rosacea, and rheumatoid arthritis. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Data were obtained primarily from randomized placebo-controlled trials upon which key recommendations are based. DATA SYNTHESIS: Antibiotics are often prescribed for months or even years for treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions such as acne, blepharitis, cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis, periodontitis, rosacea, and rheumatoid arthritis. Randomized controlled trials have shown that azithromycin is useful in the management of cystic fibrosis and the tetracyclines are beneficial in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, acne, blepharitis, and periodontitis. Several large, randomized controlled trials have failed to show any benefit of macrolides in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. No randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials have been performed to assess the efficacy of macrolides or tetracyclines in patients with rosacea. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tetracyclines and macrolides for rosacea is based primarily on anecdotal reports or open-label trials. Limited clinical trials support the use of tetracyclines or macrolides in acne, blepharitis, periodontitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and cystic fibrosis. Trials to date do not support the use of antibiotics for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapy , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Tetracyclines/therapeutic use , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Blepharitis/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy , Humans , Periodontitis/drug therapy , Rosacea/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...