Rheumatoid Arthritis Care Experiences of Black People Living in Canada: A Qualitative Study to Inform Health Service Improvements.

OBJECTIVE: To understand experiences related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care and propose service-level strategies to reduce and mitigate inequities for Black people living in Canada. METHODS: Purposive and respondent driven sampling was used to recruit participants for qualitative interviews to explore population factors relevant to RA care and challenges and facilitators for access to health care services, medications, and enacting preferred treatment plans. Thematic analysis was conducted using the Braun and Clarke method with inductive and deductive coding and critical race theory guiding analysis. RESULTS: Six women and two men with RA, and two women health care professionals, expressed how their racial identity contributed to their understanding of RA, preferences for treatment, and outcome goals. Health care access was influenced by financial limitations and racism, by exclusion, and discrimination, and also by cultural norms in seeking health care and awareness about RA within the Black community. Participants experienced health system fragmentation and were not connected to ancillary supports. Treatment decision-making was influenced by the legacy of oppression and medical experimentation on Black people and the predominance of biomedical approaches emphasized by health care providers. Holistic and cultural approaches, provided in safe, trauma-informed care environments, with flexibility in service models, are desired. Partnerships between arthritis care services and Black community organizations are proposed to promote community awareness and knowledge about arthritis and provide support mechanisms for patients within their community. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights unique considerations based on race and ethnicity and provides suggestions for arthritis care to mitigate inequities for Black people living with arthritis.

Delivering Team-Based Primary Care for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: An Interpretive Description Qualitative Study of Healthcare Provider Perspectives.

Background: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and disabling health issue. Team-based models of primary care are ideally positioned to provide comprehensive care for patients with chronic LBP. A better understanding of primary care team perspectives can inform future efforts to improve how team-based care is provided for patients with chronic LBP in this practice setting. Aims: The aim of this study was to understand health care providers' experiences, perceived barriers and facilitators, and recommendations when providing team-based primary care for the management of chronic LBP. Methods: We conducted an interpretive description qualitative study based on focus group discussions with health care providers from team-based primary care settings in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: We conducted five focus groups with five different primary care teams, including a total of 31 health care providers. We constructed four themes (each with subthemes) related to experiences, perceived barriers and facilitators, and recommendations to providing team-based primary care for the management of chronic LBP, including (1) care pathways and models of service delivery, (2) team processes and organization, (3) team culture and environment, and (4) patient needs and readiness. Conclusions: Primary care teams are implementing diverse care pathways and models of service delivery for the management of patients with chronic LBP, which can be influenced by patient, team, and organizational factors. Results have potential implications for future research and practice innovations to improve how team-based primary care is delivered for patients with chronic LBP.

Contexte: La lombalgie chronique est un probléme de santé répandu et invalidant. Les modéles de soins primaires en équipe sont particuliérement bien placés pour dispenser des soins complets aux patients souffrant de lombalgie chronique. Une meilleure compréhension des perspectives de l'équipe de soins primaires peut éclairer les efforts futurs visant à améliorer la façon dont les soins en équipe sont dispensés aux patients atteints de lombalgie chronique dans ce cadre de pratique.Objectifs: L'objectif de cette étude était de comprendre les expériences des prestataires de soins de santé, les obstacles et les facilitateurs perçus, ainsi que les recommandations pour la prestation de soins primaires en équipe dans le cadre de la prise en charge de la lombalgie chronique.Méthodes: Nous avons mené une étude qualitative de description interprétative basée sur des discussions de groupe avec des prestataires de soins de santé issus de milieux de soins primaires en équipe en Ontario, au Canada. Les données ont été analysées à l'aide d'une analyse thématique.Résultats: Nous avons organisé cinq groupes de discussion avec cinq équipes de soins primaires différentes, auxquels ont participé 31 prestataires de soins de santé. Nous avons construit quatre thémes (chacun avec des sous-thémes) liés aux expériences, aux obstacles et aux facilitateurs perçus, ainsi qu'aux recommandations relatives à la prestation de services primaires en équipe pour la prise en charge de la lombalgie chronique, y compris (1) les parcours de soins et les modéles de prestation de services, (2) les processus et l'organisation de l'équipe, (3) la culture et l'environnement de l'équipe, et (4) les besoins des patients et leur état de préparation.Conclusions: Les équipes de soins primaires mettent en œuvre divers parcours de soins et modéles de prestation de services pour la prise en charge des patients atteints de lombalgie chronique, qui peuvent être influencés par des facteurs liés au patient, à l'équipe et à l'organisation. Les résultats ont des implications potentielles pour la recherche future et les innovations dans la pratique afin d'améliorer la façon dont les soins primaires en équipe sont dispensés aux patients atteints de lombalgie chronique.

Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.

BACKGROUND: The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is a pan-Canadian research network focused on innovating and improving the quality and delivery of pain prevention, assessment, management and research for all Canadians. An important focus of the CPN is to work in collaboration with patient partners. Patient partners, researchers and clinicians work together in all aspects of the research network including on funded research projects and in the governance of the Network. Given this focus, the CPN identified the importance of evaluating their patient engagement work to understand its functioning and impact. METHODS: The objective of this exploratory evaluation case study was to understand the impacts of patient engagement on the CPN. The CPN worked with an external evaluation team which established an arms-length approach to the evaluation. Interviews were conducted with CPN members, including patient partners, leadership, funded researchers and committee co-chairs, at three discrete time points to trace the evolution of the patient engagement program within the Network. Key Network documents were also collected and reviewed. Data were analyzed following each set of interviews using content analysis guided by the principles of constant comparison and qualitative description. A final round of analysis was conducted using the Engage with Impact Toolkit, an impact measurement framework, to identify impacts of engagement. RESULTS: Impacts of patient engagement were identified at the individual, network, funded research project and research community levels. These impacts were observed in the following areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: While not without challenges, the patient engagement efforts of the CPN demonstrates the impact engaging patient partners can have on a national research network and related policy activities. Understanding the approaches to, and impacts of, patient engagement on health research networks can illuminate the value of having patient partners engaged in all aspects of a research network and should serve as encouragement to others who look to take on similar work.

The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is one of a group of research networks that was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to support patient-oriented research in chronic diseases. From the beginning of its work, the CPN has included patients as partners. Patient partners are co-chairs of all Network governance committees, funded projects are required to include patient partners in their work and there is a committee dedicated to engagement, the Patient Engagement (PE) committee. The PE Committee determined that it was important to evaluate how the CPN was engaging with patient partners and collaborated with the Public and Patient Engagement Collaborative (PPEC) to evaluate this work. The PPEC, along with members of the PE Committee, identified understanding the impact of patient engagement as an important part of the evaluation. This paper provides a description of the impacts of patient engagement on the people who were involved in the CPN, on the CPN's work and way of being, and on the broader pain research community. Based on the results from three sets of interviews and review of Network documents, we share impacts identified in seven areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain. This research shows us the impact that engaging patient partners can have on a national research network, and the areas where greater focus could, perhaps, lead to even greater impacts in future networks.

The State of Patient Engagement among Pain Research Trainees in Canada: Results of a National Web-Based Survey.

Background: Patient engagement (PE) in research refers to partnering with people with lived experience (e.g., patients, caregivers, family) as collaborators in the research process. Although PE is increasingly being recognized as an important aspect of health research, the current state of PE among pain research trainees in Canada is unclear. Aims: The aims of this study were to describe perspectives about and experiences with PE among trainees conducting pain research in Canada, to identify perceived barriers and facilitators, and to describe recommendations to improve its implementation. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey (English and French) was administered to trainees at any level conducting pain research at any Canadian academic institution. Results: A total of 128 responses were received; 115 responses were complete and included in the final analysis. The majority of respondents identified as women (90/115; 78.3%), in graduate school (83/115; 72.2%), and conducting clinical pain research (83/115; 72.2%). Most respondents (103/115; 89.6%) indicated that PE is "very" or "extremely" important. Despite this, only a minority of respondents (23/111; 20.7%) indicated that they "often" or "always" implement PE within their own research. The most common barrier identified was lack of knowledge regarding the practical implementation of PE, and understanding its positive value was the most commonly reported facilitator. Recommendations for improving the implementation of PE were diverse. Conclusions: Despite viewing PE as important in research, a minority of pain research trainees regularly implement PE. Results highlight perceived barriers and facilitators to PE and provide insight to inform the development of future training and other enabling initiatives.

Contexte: L'engagement des patients dans la recherche fait référence au partenariat avec des personnes ayant une expérience vécue (p. ex. des patients, des soignants ou des membres de la famille) en tant que collaborateurs dans le processus de recherche. Bien que l'engagement des patients soit de plus en plus reconnu comme un aspect important de la recherche en santé, son état actuel chez les stagiaires en recherche sur la douleur au Canada n'est pas clair.Objectif: Les objectifs de cette étude étaient de décrire les points de vue et les expériences sur l'engagement des patients chez les stagiaires menant des études sur la douleur au Canada, de recenser les obstacles et les facilitateurs perçus et de formuler des recommandations pour améliorer sa mise en œuvre.Méthodes: Une enquête transversale sur le Web (en anglais et en français) a été menée auprès des stagiaires de tout niveau menant des études sur la douleur dans n'importe quel établissement universitaire canadien.Résultats: Au total, 128 réponses ont été reçues; 115 réponses étaient complètes et ont été incluses dans l'analyse finale. La majorité des répondants ont indiqué qu'elles étaient des femmes (90/115; 78,3 %), qu'elles étaient inscrites aux cycles supérieures (83/115 ; 72,2 %) et qu'elles effectuaient des études cliniques sur la douleur (83/115 ; 72,2 %). La plupart des répondants (103/115 ; 89,6 %) ont indiqué que l'engagement était « très ¼ ou « extrêmement ¼ important. Malgré cela, seule une minorité de répondants (23/111; 20,7 %) ont indiqué qu'ils mettaient en œuvre l'engagement des patients « souvent ¼ ou « toujours ¼ dans leur propre recherche. L'obstacle le plus fréquemment énoncé était le manque de connaissances concernant la mise en œuvre pratique de l'engagement des patients, et la compréhension de sa valeur positive était le facilitateur le plus souvent signalé. Les recommandations visant à améliorer la mise en œuvre de l'engagement des patients étaient diverses.Conclusions: Bien que l'engagement des patients soit considéré comme important dans la recherche, une minorité de stagiaires en recherche sur la douleur le mettent régulièrement en œuvre. Les résultats mettent en évidence les obstacles et les facilitateurs perçus pour l'engagement des patients et fournissent un aperçu pour éclairer l'élaboration de la formation future et d'autres initiatives habilitantes.

Best Practices for Virtual Care: A Consensus Statement From the Canadian Rheumatology Association.

OBJECTIVE: To develop best practice statements for the provision of virtual care in adult and pediatric rheumatology for the Canadian Rheumatology Association's (CRA) Telehealth Working Group (TWG). METHODS: Four members of the TWG representing adult, pediatric, university-based, and community rheumatology practices defined the scope of the project. A rapid literature review of existing systematic reviews, policy documents, and published literature and abstracts on the topic was conducted between April and May 2021. The review informed a candidate set of 7 statements and a supporting document. The statements were submitted to a 3-round (R) modified Delphi process with 22 panelists recruited through the CRA and patient advocacy organizations. Panelists rated the importance and feasibility of the statements on a Likert scale of 1-9. Statements with final median ratings between 7-9 with no disagreement were retained in the final set. RESULTS: Twenty-one (95%) panelists participated in R1, 15 (71%) in R2, and 18 (82%) in R3. All but 1 statement met inclusion criteria during R1. Revisions were made to 5/7 statements following R2 and an additional statement was added. All statements met inclusion criteria following R3. The statements addressed the following themes in the provision of virtual care: adherence to existing standards and regulations, appropriateness, consent, physical examination, patient-reported outcomes, use in addition to in-person visits, and complex comanagement of disease. CONCLUSION: The best practice statements represent a starting point for advancing virtual care in rheumatology. Future educational efforts to help implement these best practices and research to address identified knowledge gaps are planned.

Guidance on authorship with and acknowledgement of patient partners in patient-oriented research.

The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Chronic Pain Network was founded in 2016 and is a patient-oriented research network funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The Network incorporates patient partners throughout its governance and operations meaning that patient partners may contribute to research projects in ways that warrant scientific authorship as defined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The Network did a brief informal review of guidance on patient authorship in 2019, but could not find any practical documentation to guide its members on this topic. Note the term patient partner here refers to a patient (or caregiver or other person with lived experience) who is a partner or collaborator on a research team. This guidance does not address patients as participants in a research study. This guidance has been co-written by a group of researchers and patient partners of the Chronic Pain Network in an effort to address this gap. It is intended for both researchers and patient partner audiences. This guidance is meant to facilitate conversations between researchers and patient partners about authorship and/or acknowledgement regarding research projects on which they collaborate. While the overall principles of academic authorship and acknowledgement remain unchanged, nuances for interpreting these principles through the lens of patient engagement or patient-oriented research is provided. Teams that carry out patient-oriented research projects will require different preparation to empower all team members (researchers and patient partners) to discuss authorship and acknowledgement. To facilitate these conversations, we have included an overview of the scientific publishing process, explanation of some common terms, and sets of considerations are provided for both patient partners and researchers in determining the range of team member contribution from acknowledgement to authorship. Conversations about authorship can be difficult, even for established research teams. This guidance, and the resources discussed within it, are provided with the intention of making these conversations easier and more thoughtful.