ABSTRACT
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment option for Parkinson's Disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and epilepsy in the United States. There are disparities in access to DBS, and clear understanding of the contextual factors driving them is important. Previous studies aimed at understanding these factors have been limited by single indications or small cohort sizes. The aim of this study is to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis of DBS utilization for multiple indications to better understand the factors driving disparities in access. Methods: The United States based National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to analyze the surgical volume and trends of procedures based on indication, using relevant ICD codes. Predictors of DBS use were analyzed using a logistic regression model. DBS-implanted patients in each indication were compared based on the patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables. Findings: Our analysis of 104,356 DBS discharges from 1993 to 2017 revealed that the most frequent indications for DBS were PD (67%), ET (24%), and dystonia (4%). Although the number of DBS procedures has consistently increased over the years, radiofrequency ablation utilization has significantly decreased to only a few patients per year since 2003. Negative predictors for DBS utilization in PD and ET cohorts included age increase and female sex, while African American status was a negative predictor across all cohorts. Significant differences in patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables between DBS indications were also determined. Interpretation: Demographic and socioeconomic-based disparities in DBS use are evident. Although racial disparities are present across all indications, other disparities such as age, sex, wealth, and insurance status are only relevant in certain indications. Funding: This work was supported by Alan & Susan Hudson Cornerstone Chair in Neurosurgery at University Health Network.
ABSTRACT
A 62-year-old woman presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to a ruptured right supraclinoid internal carotid artery blister aneurysm. She was treated in an emergent fashion with two flow diverting pipeline embolization devices (PED) deployed in a telescoping fashion. CT angiography performed for unrelated reasons at 7â months showed successful treatment of the aneurysm without evidence of residual aneurysm. However, a follow-up digital subtraction angiogram performed at 9â months showed a large aneurysm in a modified position compared with the original aneurysm. This is the first case of rapid regrowth of a supraclinoid blister aneurysm after successful treatment with a PED, and demonstrates the need for close follow-up for similar aneurysms treated with this novel device.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured/therapy , Carotid Artery Diseases/therapy , Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Stents , Aneurysm, Ruptured/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A 62-year-old woman presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to a ruptured right supraclinoid internal carotid artery blister aneurysm. She was treated in an emergent fashion with two flow diverting pipeline embolization devices (PED) deployed in a telescoping fashion. CT angiography performed for unrelated reasons at 7â months showed successful treatment of the aneurysm without evidence of residual aneurysm. However, a follow-up digital subtraction angiogram performed at 9â months showed a large aneurysm in a modified position compared with the original aneurysm. This is the first case of rapid regrowth of a supraclinoid blister aneurysm after successful treatment with a PED, and demonstrates the need for close follow-up for similar aneurysms treated with this novel device.
