Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Blood ; 105(2): 767-74, 2005 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15454483

ABSTRACT

Resistance to fludarabine is observed in the clinic, and molecular predictive assays for benefit from chemotherapy are required. Our objective was to determine if expression of nucleoside transport and metabolism genes was associated with response to fludarabine therapy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). CLL cells from 56 patients were collected prior to treatment with fludarabine. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on sample RNA to determine the relative levels of mRNA of 3 nucleoside transporters that mediate fludarabine uptake (human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 [hENT1], human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 2 [hENT2], and human concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 [hCNT3]), deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), and 3 5'-nucleotidases (ecto-5'nucleotidase [CD73], deoxynucleotidase-1 [dNT-1], and cytoplasmic high-Km 5-nucleotidase [CN-II]). Two-dimensional hierarchical cluster analysis of gene expression identified 2 distinct populations of CLL. Cluster 2 patients experienced a 3.4-fold higher risk of disease progression than cluster 1 patients (P = .0058, log-rank analysis). Furthermore, independent analysis of the individual genes of interest revealed statistically significant differences for risk of disease progression (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs]) with underexpression of dNT-1 (HR = 0.45; P = .042), CD73 (HR = 0.40; P = .022), and dCK (HR = 0.0.48; P = .035), and overexpression of hCNT3 (HR = 4.7; P = .0007) genes. Subjects with elevated hCNT3 expression experienced a lower complete response rate to fludarabine therapy (11% vs 69%; P = .002). No hCNT3-mediated plasma membrane nucleoside transport was detected in CLL samples expressing hCNT3 message, and hCNT3 protein was localized to the cytoplasm with immunohistochemical and confocal microscopy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/physiopathology , Nucleoside Transport Proteins/genetics , Nucleoside Transport Proteins/metabolism , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Vidarabine/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/metabolism , Male , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Mol Pharmacol ; 65(4): 925-33, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15044622

ABSTRACT

Pharmacologically important drugs were examined as potential inhibitors or permeants of human concentrative nucleoside transporters 1 (hCNT1)- and 2 (hCNT2)-producing stable transfectants by assessing their abilities to inhibit uridine transport. hCNT1 exhibited high affinities for uridine analogs (5-fluorouridine, 2'-deoxyuridine, 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, and 5-fluoro-5'-deoxyuridine) with K(i) values of 22 to 33 microM, whereas hCNT2 exhibited moderate affinities for 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, high affinities for 2'-deoxyuridine and 5-fluorouridine, and low affinity for 5-fluoro-5'-deoxyuridine. The uridine analogs were transported at 2-fold higher rates (at 10 microM) by hCNT1 than by hCNT2. Enantiomeric configuration and the 3'-hydroxyl group of the ribose ring were important determinants for interaction with hCNTs, whereas the 2'-hydroxyl group was less important. Both transporters bound N(6)-(p-aminobenzyl)adenosine with affinities similar to those of adenosine (K(i) = 28-39 microM). Other adenosine receptor ligands, including caffeine, bound better to hCNT1 than to hCNT2 (K(i) = 46 versus 103 microM, respectively), whereas 2-chloroadenosine bound better to hCNT2 than to hCNT1 (K(i) = 37 and 101 microM, respectively). There was a greater than 3-fold difference in binding affinities between hCNT1 and hCNT2 for nicotine (K(i) = 63 versus 227 microM). However, direct measurements of nicotine and caffeine uptake rates (10 microM) failed to demonstrate mediated uptake by either transporter. Although hCNT1 bound several adenosine analogs relatively well, it did not transport 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (cladribine) or 2-fluoro-9-beta-d-arabinofuranosyladenine (fludarabine), whereas hCNT2 transported both, albeit with low activities. The results indicated that although hCNT1 and hCNT2 possess some overlap in transport of several uridine and adenosine analogs, they also exhibit distinct differences in capacity to interact with some adenosine receptor ligands, adenosine-based drugs, and nicotine.


Subject(s)
Caffeine/pharmacology , Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Nicotine/pharmacology , Uridine/pharmacology , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine/pharmacology , Biological Transport/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Floxuridine/pharmacology , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Transfection , Tritium , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Uridine/analogs & derivatives
3.
Mol Pharmacol ; 64(6): 1512-20, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14645682

ABSTRACT

An extensive series of structural analogs of uridine that differed in substituents in the sugar and/or base moieties were subjected to inhibitor-sensitivity assays in a yeast expression system to define uridine structural determinants for inhibitors of human concentrative nucleoside transporters 1 and 3 (hCNT1 and hCNT3). The production of recombinant hCNT1 and hCNT3 in a nucleoside-transporter deficient strain of yeast was confirmed by immunoblotting, and uridine transport parameters (Km, Vmax) were determined by defining the concentration dependence of initial rates of uptake of [3H]uridine by intact yeast. The Ki values of uridine analogs were obtained from inhibitory-effect curves and converted to binding energies. hCNT1 and hCNT3 recognized uridine through distinguishable binding motifs. hCNT1 was sensitive to modifications at C(3), less sensitive at C(5') or N(3), and much less sensitive at C(2'). hCNT3 was sensitive to modifications at C(3'), but much less sensitive at N(3), C(5') or C(2'). The changes of binding energy between transporter proteins and different uridine analogs suggested that hCNT1 formed hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) with C(3')-OH, C(5')-OH, or N(3)-H of uridine, but not with C(2')-OH, whereas hCNT3 formed H-bonds to C(3')-OH, but not to N(3)-H, C(5')-OH, and C(2')-OH. Both transporters barely tolerated modifications at C(3') or inversion of configurations at C(2')orC(3'). The binding profiles identified in this study can be used to predict the potential transportability of nucleoside analogs, including anticancer or antiviral nucleoside drugs, by hCNT1 and hCNT3.


Subject(s)
Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Uridine/metabolism , Binding Sites , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Nucleoside Transport Proteins/metabolism , Protein Binding , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Uridine/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...