Superiority of anthracycline-free treatment in standard-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia: A systematic review and comparative epidemiological analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML) have seen unprecedented improvements in patient outcomes. However, such rapid growth in understanding often leads to uncertainty regarding superiority among candidate treatment regimens, especially when further scrutinized from an epidemiological perspective. AIMS: The aim of this systematic review with epidemiological analysis was to identify and compare commonly utilized protocols for standard-risk APML with a particular focus on complete remission (CR), overall/disease-free survival (DFS), and reported adverse events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL were interrogated to identify studies utilizing all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in addition to arsenic trioxide (ATO) and/or anthracyclines such as idarubicin (IDA) in the treatment of de-novo APML. After collation of studies, an epidemiological analysis was subsequently performed to compare protocols with regards to outcomes of interest using number needed to benefit (NNB) and number needed to harm (NNH) measures. Seventeen articles, describing 12 distinct trials, were included in the analysis. These trials made use of three unique protocols; CR rates were 94%-100% for ATO/ATRA regimens, 95%-96% for ATO/ATRA/anthracycline regimens, and 89%-94% for ATRA/anthracycline regimens. Epidemiological analysis demonstrated NNB for CR was 9.09 (ATO/ATRA vs. ATRA/IDA) and 20.00 (ATO/ATRA vs. ATO/ATRA/IDA), NNH for neutropenia was -3.45 (ATO/ATRA vs. ATRA/IDA), and NNH for infection was -3.13 (ATO/ATRA vs. ATRA/IDA) and -1.89 (ATO/ATRA vs. ATO/ATRA/IDA). CONCLUSION: The ATO/ATRA regimen is superior to chemotherapy-containing protocols at inducing remission and promoting survival in patients with APML. The regimen is better tolerated than the proposed alternatives with fewer adverse events. Future research opportunities include quantifying APML epidemiology and pursuing oral arsenic as an option for simplification of therapeutic protocols.

Na-AIP-1 secreted by human hookworms suppresses collagen-induced arthritis.

Proteins from helminths have been posed as new immunomodulatory agents with exciting potential in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study we assess the effects of a helminthic excretory/secretory (ES) protein Na-AIP-1 as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in the well-described collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) model of RA. CIA was induced in DBA/1 J mice which were treated after the onset of arthritis with Na-AIP-1 monotherapy, MTX or Na-AIP-1 + MTX. The clinical scores for weight, arthritis and paw width were recorded along with joint histology as outcome measures. For the clinical parameters of weight, paw score and paw width, none of the Na-AIP-1 monotherapy, MTX therapy or Na-AIP-1 + MTX combination therapy groups displayed any significant difference when compared to the arthritis control. However, a significant reduction in histological score was identified after both monotherapy (Na-AIP-1: 0.83 ± 0.24 vs Arthritis control: 5.58 ± 1.49, p = 0.0277) and combination therapy (Na-AIP-1 + MTX: 0.55 ± 0.28 vs Arthritis control: 5.58 ± 1.49, p = 0.0233) when compared to arthritis control. Furthermore, Na-AIP-1 as both monotherapy (Na-AIP-1: 0.83 ± 0.24 vs MTX: 5.73 ± 1.82 p = 0.0261) and combination therapy (Na-AIP-1 + MTX: 0.55 ± 0.28 vs MTX: 5.73 ± 1.82, p = 0.0221) also significantly reduced histological score when compared to MTX monotherapy. Na-AIP-1 significantly reduced joint pathology in CIA. The hookworm protein Na-AIP-1 seems to be effective in the treatment of RA as monotherapy and when dosed together with MTX, constituting a potential new candidate for drug development. Research should focus on elucidating the mechanism of Na-AIP-1 action as a means to identify novel targets for therapeutics and to further our current understanding of immunobiology in RA.

Helminth-based therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Proteins from parasitic worms have been posed as novel therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other auto-inflammatory diseases. However, with so many potential therapeutics, it is important that drug discovery be based on the specific phyla or species which show the most promising effects. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the reported effects of helminthic secretory proteins and derivative therapy on RA in an animal model. METHODS: Medline, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to identify studies evaluating helminthic therapy in the collagen-induced arthritis model of RA. A meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the overall effect of the proteins. Subgroup analyses were also undertaken to investigate individual treatments. RESULTS: Seven articles were included in the analysis. Overall, helminthic therapy significantly reduced arthritis score (SMD -1.193, 95% CI -1.525, -0.860). Subgroup analyses found a significant reduction in arthritis score following treatment with helminth protein ES-62 (SMD -1.186, 95% CI -1.633, -0.738) and phosphorylcholine-based treatment (SMD -0.997, 95% CI -1.423, -0.571). Subgroup analyses found ES-62 treatment significantly decreased IFN-γ levels (SMD -1.611, 95% CI -2.734, -0.487) and significantly increased levels of IL-10 (SMD 0.946, 95% CI 0.127, 1.765). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutics from parasitic worms are a promising avenue for drug discovery, especially with all included studies reporting a significant improvement in arthritis score. Based on pooled data presented in this study, the nematode Acanthocheilonema viteae seems to be of particular interest for therapeutics.

Regulatory T-cell dynamics with abatacept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.

The progressive damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been linked to an increase in inflammatory Th1/Th17 cells and a decrease in number or function of immunomodulatory regulatory T cells (Tregs). Many therapies that are effective in RA are shown to affect Th1/Th17 cells and/or Tregs. One such therapy, abatacept, utilizes a physiologic immunomodulatory molecule called cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) which causes contact-dependent inhibition of inflammatory T-cell activation. Recent advances in CTLA-4 research has uncovered the method by which this occurs physiologically but the actions of the CTLA-4Ig fusion protein are still not fully understood. The reported effects of the drug on Treg population number and suppressor function have been very mixed. In this review, we will discuss the current literature surrounding the effects of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis and explore potential explanations for the differences in results. Future opportunities in this area include contributions to a unified definition for different immune cell populations, LAG3+ Tregs which may pose an avenue for further study or the stratification of patients with regards to their specific disease characteristics, resulting in optimized treatment for disease remission.