Unintentional root fragment retention in proximity to dental implants: a series of six human case reports.

There has been renewed interest in intentionally placing dental implants in proximity to or in contact with tooth root fragments. In clinical practice, human teeth are usually extracted due to nonrestorable caries, vertical or horizontal root fractures, periodontal disease, or endodontic failure, which is commonly accompanied by inflammation and bacterial contamination. The aim of this case series is to present the adverse effects in humans of clinically undetected root-to-implant contact (CURIC), where implants were unintentionally placed in proximity to undetected retained root fragments. The adverse effects of small (3 to 5 mm) root fragments were detectible 6 to 48 months post implant placement. Three out of seven implants in six patients were removed due to severe coronal bone loss. This differs from retrograde peri-implantitis, where only the apical area of the implant is affected and the coronal portion remains integrated. The detrimental effect of root fragment-to-implant contact is described along with its clinical management. Based on the review of currently relevant data, mixed results have been documented regarding the success of dental implants in proximity to tooth-root fragments. Careful evaluation of long-term, postloading results in humans where hopeless teeth have been extracted due to infection and significant bone loss are required before intentional root fragment retention is considered a safe and reliable clinical option for implant placement.

Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage Procedures: Practical Applications From the AAP Regeneration Workshop.

Focused Clinical Question: How should gingival recession (GR) defects be managed based on current evidence? Summary: The purpose of this practical application is to illustrate the management of GR defects with a primary outcome goal of complete root coverage. The consensus in dental literature and among expert clinicians is that root coverage may be attained through the application of different procedures and that outcomes are generally measured by reduced defect depth, gain in clinical attachment, and an increase in keratinized tissue (KT). These procedures may include the use of: 1) subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG); 2) coronally advanced flap; 3) free gingival graft; and 4) soft tissue graft substitutes (acellular dermal matrix and xenogeneic collagen matrix materials) and biologics (recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor and enamel matrix derivative). The variability in these techniques revolves around the inclusion or avoidance of a palatal donor graft. The decision as to how to approach a specific clinical GR-type defect should be a combination of considerations relative to the clinician's surgical goals and the patient's understanding of the anticipated outcome. The associated systematic review (Chambrone and Tatakis, J Periodontol 2015;86(Suppl.):S8-S51) provides clear evidence that SCTG-based procedures provide the best outcome for mean and complete root coverage, as well as an increase in KT. Patient-reported outcomes, a topic that needs additional research, should be considered in the decision-making process. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence and the illustrated cases included in this practical application, root coverage can be predictably achieved and a successful clinical outcome can be maintained long term.

Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop.

BACKGROUND: Management of gingival recession defects, a common periodontal condition, using root coverage procedures is an important aspect of periodontal regenerative therapy. The goal of the periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures group was to develop a consensus report based on the accompanying systematic review of root coverage procedures, including priorities for future research and identification of the best evidence available to manage different clinical scenarios. METHODS: The group reviewed and discussed the accompanying systematic review, which covered treatment of single-tooth recession defects, multiple-tooth recession defects, and additional focused questions on relevant clinical topics. The consensus group members submitted additional material for consideration by the group in advance and at the time of the meeting. The group also identified priorities for future research. RESULTS: All reviewed root coverage procedures provide significant reduction in recession depth, especially for Miller Class I and II recession defects. Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) procedures provide the best root coverage outcomes. Acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) or enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in conjunction with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) can serve as alternatives to autogenous donor tissue. Additional research is needed to do the following: 1) assess the treatment outcomes for multiple-tooth recession defects, oral sites other than maxillary canine and premolar teeth, and Miller Class III and IV defects; 2) assess the role of patient- and site-specific factors on procedure outcomes; and 3) obtain evidence on patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Predictable root coverage is possible for single-tooth and multiple-tooth recession defects, with SCTG procedures providing the best root coverage outcomes. Alternatives to SCTG are supported by evidence of varying strength. Additional research is needed on treatment outcomes for specific oral sites. Clinical Recommendation: For Miller Class I and II single-tooth recession defects, SCTG procedures provide the best outcomes, whereas ADMG or EMD in conjunction with CAF may be used as an alternative.

Planned labial plate advancement with simultaneous single implant placement for narrow anterior ridges followed by reentry confirmation.

This article reports on the efficacy of a technique involving expansion of edentulous ridges of less than 3 mm in width by means of a planned green stick fracture of the labial plate and simultaneous implant placement without the need for membranes. This retrospective case series includes long-term results from 21 patients with 36 sites and 37 implants with a mean follow-up of 4 years, 5 months from the date of restoration. Freeze-dried bone allograft was used in 22 sites (61%) to augment the ridge. Reentry at stage-two surgery confirmed the preservation of the displaced labial plate after implant integration. Three implants were removed prior to the planned uncovering because of incomplete healing of the overlying gingival tissue; therefore, the survival rate of the labial advancement was 92%. No implants failed after definitive prosthetic loading; therefore, the cumulative survival rate of loaded implants was 100%. No significant bone loss was detected at the final follow-up visit. Follow-up after loading ranged from 9 to 148 months. Advancement of the labial plate with simultaneous implant placement to gain horizontal ridge width dimension was shown to be a reliable and practical procedure for single-tooth sites where other grafting methods are often difficult.

The segmental down fracture for vertical bone augmentation: case report.

The aim of this singular case report is to describe correction of a severe vertical bone and soft tissue deficiency in the maxillary esthetic zone. The defect was corrected by using a single stage segmental down fracture technique. Treatment results were followed for 9 years, revealing stable bone, soft tissue, and bone levels adjacent to the dental implants.

Vertical ridge augmentation procedure using guided bone regeneration, demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, and miniscrews: 4- to 13-year observations on loaded implants.

This retrospective case series presents results from eight patients treated with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft particles and barrier membranes using either miniscrews or implants to support the membrane in seven patients. In all patients, the amount of vertical bone regeneration enabled placement of one or more implants in the graft sites, followed by loading with definitive prostheses at least 5.5 months after implant placement. Marginal bone heights around the implants have remained stable throughout 4 to 13 years of follow-up.

Complete-arch maxillary rehabilitation using a custom-designed and manufactured titanium framework: a clinical report.

Fabrication of a passive framework when restoring multiple implants in an edentulous maxilla may be an important requisite for long-term implant survival. The development of computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques for fabricating custom 1-piece titanium frameworks can simplify that challenge. This article reports on a treatment in which a custom-milled titanium complete-arch maxillary framework was used to restore a compromised maxillary arch. A 4-year follow-up demonstrated a steady state of bone and no prosthodontic complications.

A study of 275 retrieved Brånemark oral implants.

The aim of this report was to describe the bone tissue response to Brånemark oral implants retrieved from patients. The material consisted of consecutively received Brånemark threaded oral implants and related patient data provided by clinicians. The implant samples were processed into undecalcified sections for evaluation under the light microscope. The analysis demonstrated a lower percentage of bone-to-implant contact for the unloaded implants as compared to the loaded implants. When the threads were divided into four different regions, the loaded implants had a lower percentage of bone-contacting length at the thread top as compared to the other three regions.