ABSTRACT
Advanced surface modifications and materials were tested on the same implant geometry. Six types of dental implants were tested for osseointegration after 2, 4 and 8 weeks in a sheep pelvis model. Four titanium implant types were treated with newly developed surface modifications, of which two were chemically and two were pharmacologically modified. One implant was made of zirconia. A sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface was used as reference. The chemically modified implants were plasma-anodized or coated with calcium phosphate. The pharmacological coatings contained either bisphosphonate or collagen type I with chondroitin sulphate. The implants were evaluated using macroscopic, radiographic and histomorphometric methods. All implants were well osseointegrated at the time of death. All titanium implants had similar bone implant contact (BIC) at 2 weeks (57-61%); only zirconia was better (77%). The main BIC increase was between 2 and 4 weeks. The pharmacologically coated implants (78-79%) and the calcium phosphate coating (83%) showed similar results compared with the reference implant (80%) at 8 weeks. There were no significant differences in BIC. Compared with previous studies the results of all implants were comparatively good.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Prosthesis Design , Titanium/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Animals , Bone Remodeling/physiology , Calcium Phosphates/chemistry , Chondroitin Sulfates/chemistry , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/chemistry , Collagen Type I/chemistry , Dental Etching/methods , Diphosphonates/chemistry , Electrochemical Techniques , Fluorescent Dyes , Ilium/pathology , Ilium/surgery , Materials Testing , Models, Animal , Osseointegration/physiology , Sheep , Surface Properties , Time Factors , Wound Healing/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Titanium implants have a tendency for high bone-implant bonding, and, in comparison to stainless steel implants are more difficult to remove. The current study was carried out to evaluate, i) the release strength of three selected anodized titanium surfaces with increased nanohardness and low roughness, and ii) bone-implant bonding in vivo. These modified surfaces were intended to give improved anchorage while facilitating easier removal of temporary implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The new surfaces were referenced to a stainless steel implant and a standard titanium implant surface (TiMAX). In a sheep limb model, healing period was 3 months. Bone-implant bonding was evaluated either biomechanically or histologically. RESULTS: The new surface anodized screws demonstrated similar or slightly higher bone-implant-contact (BIC) and torque release forces than the titanium reference. The BIC of the stainless steel implants was significant lower than two of the anodized surfaces (p = 0.04), but differences between stainless steel and all titanium implants in torque release forces were not significant (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The new anodized titanium surfaces showed good bone-implant bonding despite a smooth surface and increased nanohardness. However, they failed to facilitate implant removal at 3 months.
