Associations of sleep duration and daytime sleepiness with plasma amyloid beta and cognitive performance in cognitively unimpaired, middle-aged and older African Americans.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Given the established racial disparities in both sleep health and dementia risk for African American populations, we assess cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of self-report sleep duration (SRSD) and daytime sleepiness with plasma amyloid beta (Aß) and cognition in an African American (AA) cohort. METHODS: In a cognitively unimpaired sample drawn from the African Americans Fighting Alzheimer's in Midlife (AA-FAiM) study, data on SRSD, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, demographics, and cognitive performance were analyzed. Aß40, Aß42, and the Aß42/40 ratio were quantified from plasma samples. Cross-sectional analyses explored associations between baseline predictors and outcome measures. Linear mixed-effect regression models estimated associations of SRSD and daytime sleepiness with plasma Aß and cognitive performance levels and change over time. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven participants comprised the cross-sectional sample. Baseline age was 63.2 ±â€…8.51 years. 69.6% self-identified as female. SRSD was 6.4 ±â€…1.1 hours and 22.4% reported excessive daytime sleepiness. The longitudinal dataset included 57 participants. In fully adjusted models, neither SRSD nor daytime sleepiness is associated with cross-sectional or longitudinal Aß. Associations with level and trajectory of cognitive test performance varied by measure of sleep health. CONCLUSIONS: SRSD was below National Sleep Foundation recommendations and daytime sleepiness was prevalent in this cohort. In the absence of observed associations with plasma Aß, poorer self-reported sleep health broadly predicted poorer cognitive function but not accelerated decline. Future research is necessary to understand and address modifiable sleep mechanisms as they relate to cognitive aging in AA at disproportionate risk for dementia. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: Not applicable.

Validity Evidence for the Research Category, "Cognitively Unimpaired - Declining," as a Risk Marker for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.

While clinically significant cognitive impairment is the key feature of the symptomatic stages of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum, subtle cognitive decline is now known to occur years before a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to AD is made. The primary aim of this study was to examine criterion validity evidence for an operational definition of "cognitively unimpaired-declining" (CU-D) in the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP), a longitudinal cohort study following cognition and risk factors from mid-life and on. Cognitive status was determined for each visit using a consensus review process that incorporated internal norms and published norms; a multi-disciplinary panel reviewed cases first to determine whether MCI or dementia was present, and subsequently whether CU-D was present, The CU-D group differed from CU-stable (CU-S) and MCI on concurrent measures of cognition, demonstrating concurrent validity. Participants who changed from CU-S to CU-D at the next study visit demonstrated greater declines than those who stayed CU-S. In addition, those who were CU-D were more likely to progress to MCI or dementia than those who were CU-S (predictive validity). In a subsample with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, the CU-D group also differed from the CU-S and MCI/Dementia groups on measures of amyloid and tau burden, indicating that biomarker evidence of AD was elevated in those showing sub-clinical (CU-D) decline. Together, the results corroborate other studies showing that cognitive decline begins long before a dementia diagnosis and indicate that operational criteria can detect subclinical decline that may signal AD or other dementia risk.