Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med J Aust ; 198(6): 320-3, 2013 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23545030

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of transmission of measles associated with infectious people who travelled on aeroplane flights to or within Australia. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Data were obtained from state and territory health authorities on all measles notifications from January 2007 to June 2011 for people who were likely to have been infectious or infected while travelling on aeroplanes in Australia. RESULTS: Forty-five infectious people travelled on aeroplanes. Twenty secondary infections occurred in people on seven of 49 flights (14%; 95% CI, 6%-29%), comprising 19% (95% CI, 8%-40%) of the 36 international flights and none of 13 (95% CI, 0-28%) domestic flights that carried infectious people. Secondary infections occurred in nine people who were seated within two rows of the index case and in 11 people who were seated outside of two rows. Secondary transmission was more likely to occur with younger index cases (P = 0.025) and when there were multiple infectious people travelling (P = 0.018). About a third(15/49) of flight manifests were available to health authorities within 5 days oftravel. CONCLUSION: Despite secondary measles transmission occurring on 19% of international flights carrying infectious people, risk was not clearly related to seating proximity, and contact tracing was ineffective, especially given delays in diagnosis, notification and accessing flight manifests. We recommend that direct contact tracing to identify susceptible people exposed to people infected with measles on aeroplane flights should not be undertaken routinely, and other strategies should be considered.


Subject(s)
Aircraft , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/transmission , Adolescent , Australia/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Risk , Travel
2.
Med J Aust ; 177(11-12): 599-603, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12463976

ABSTRACT

There are many contaminated soil sites in Australia. Contamination may be from human activities (eg, smelters, industrial waste dumps, old gasworks) or from naturally occurring sources (eg, surface mineralisation). Concentrations of contaminants may vary markedly across a site. Their distribution may be localised or quite extensive. Common contaminants include lead, arsenic, cadmium, petrol and diesel products, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. People living on or near a contaminated site will often be concerned about potential effects on their health. Assessing their exposure potential and/or measuring levels of biological markers often allays concerns, but occasionally confirms them (eg, elevated blood lead levels and subtle cognitive effects have been found in some people living near the Port Pirie lead smelter).


Subject(s)
Environmental Health , Soil Pollutants , Australia , Biomarkers/analysis , Child , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure/standards , Hazardous Substances , Humans , Industrial Waste , Male , Soil Pollutants/adverse effects , Soil Pollutants/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...