Does CTAP prior to hepatic resection improve patient survival rates?

The purpose of our study was to compare survival rates of colon carcinoma patients who had undergone attempted curative hepatic resection based on liver staging by computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or portography (CTAP) with previously reported survival rates of patients who underwent similar surgery without preoperative CTAP evaluations. A total of 404 CTAP studies performed at three institutions were reviewed. Of this group, 197 had colon carcinoma. Sixty-nine of the colon patients went to surgery. Actuarial adjusted yearly survival rates were calculated for the prior CTAP colon group and compared to historical controls. The control survival data were taken from reports published prior to the CTAP era. Our study demonstrated no difference in the 1-year survival data between the groups. However, the CTAP patients had greater survival in years 2-4. This greater survival may be multifactorial but in part due to better surgical selection caused by CTAP.

Preoperative determination of the resectability of hepatic tumors: efficacy of CT during arterial portography.

OBJECTIVE: A multiinstitutional study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of CT during arterial portography for determining the resectability of hepatic tumors. The impact of findings from CT during arterial portography on patients' treatment (i.e., surgical vs nonsurgical) was assessed. In patients considered to have resectable tumors, the accuracy of CT during arterial portography for predicting surgical findings was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was done of 404 patients from three institutions who had CT during arterial portography during the period 1985-1991 as part of preoperative staging to determine the resectability of hepatic tumors. The tumors included metastases from colorectal carcinoma in 197 patients (49%); other hepatic metastases, mostly from adenocarcinoma of the stomach, pancreas, and biliary tree in 123 (30%); and primary hepatocellular carcinoma in 84 (21%). Imaging results were correlated with results of percutaneous biopsy of at least one hepatic lesion in patients whose tumors were considered unresectable. In patients whose tumors were considered resectable, results were correlated with preoperative percutaneous biopsy (obtained in almost all cases) and pathologic examination of a surgical specimen (all cases). Although each case was considered individually, four criteria were used for resectability: (1) accessibility of all lesions to lobar or wedge resection that would yield clear margins, (2) anticipation that residual liver tissue after resection would provide sufficient function, (3) the absence of invasion of central hepatic vascular or biliary structures, and (4) the absence of extrahepatic disease. No specific restriction was made with respect to the number of hepatic lesions present. The accuracy of findings by CT during arterial portography for predicting resectability was assessed in the 146 patients who had tumors that were considered resectable on the basis of imaging findings and had surgery. RESULTS: Of 404 patients, only 146 (36%) were thought to be candidates for resection on the basis of findings from CT during arterial portography. Of these, 122 (84%) actually had resection. The 24 patients who did not have resection included 22 patients with disease understaged or overstaged by CT during arterial portography, one with true-negative findings by CT during arterial portography, and one who died during surgery. The accuracy of findings by CT during arterial portography for predicting results at surgery was 85% for all patients and 91% for the subset of patients who had primary colorectal tumors with hepatic metastases. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that CT during arterial portography is a useful procedure for assessing the resectability of hepatic tumors. In our study, 64% of patients were spared unnecessary surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparison of MR imaging after barium administration with CT in pelvic disease.

The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for evaluating the abdomen and pelvis has been limited by the lack of a suitable contrast agent. The purpose of this study was to compare axial MR imaging after rectal barium administration with computed tomography (CT) for delineation of normal anatomy and lesions of the pelvis. MR images and CT scans of 11 patients were studied retrospectively and independently by four radiologists. No substantial differences in the visualization of normal bowel, iliac vessels, lymph nodes, bladder, prostate, seminal vesicles, uterus, and cervix and in detection of abnormalities were seen between CT scans and axial MR images obtained after barium administration. This preliminary study suggests that axial MR imaging with rectal barium is a useful alternative to CT in evaluating pelvic disease.

Preliminary results of MR imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide in pancreatic and retroperitoneal disorders.

The authors conducted a preliminary evaluation of the potential of superparamagnetic iron oxide as contrast material for delineation of the bowel. Ten patients with various pancreatic diseases and 18 patients with suspected retroperitoneal disease underwent T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging before and after contrast material was administered. Two radiologists reviewed randomized images and scored them for depiction of anatomic structures and abnormalities. In most patients, postcontrast T1-weighted images showed improved delineation of the retroperitoneal small bowel (duodenum), stomach, and pancreas. Postcontrast T2-weighted images showed improved delineation of retroperitoneal small bowel, para-aortic region, peripancreatic fat, and renal veins. There was no improvement in delineation of retroperitoneal diseases, except for lymphadenopathy, which was better seen on both T1- and T2-weighted postcontrast images. Preliminary results suggest that superparamagnetic iron oxide is a useful contrast agent for delineating some normal retroperitoneal structures, lymphadenopathy, and pancreatic disease and that it is less useful in evaluating other retroperitoneal masses.