The role of pulsatile and static intracranial pressure measurements in the management of children with craniosynostosis-an institutional experience from 49 patients.

BACKGROUND: Although measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) has occasionally been utilized in children with craniosynostosis (CSS), data on parameters of pulsatile ICP in CSS are still lacking, and the role of pulsatile ICP measurements in the management of CSS is not well established. METHODS: From our department's database, we retrieved the data from children in whom the measurement of static and pulsatile ICP was a part of the diagnostic work-up in different clinical situations related to CSS. Both clinical and ICP data were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 49 children with CSS, median age 4.4 years (range 0.2-18.9), in whom a total of 67 diagnostic ICP measurements were undertaken between 2002 and 2014. The CSS was syndromal in 23 cases. The rationale for ICP measurement was a question of indication for cranial vault expansion surgery (CVES) in 12 patients (Group 1), of its timing in 10 patients (Group 2), of suspected abnormally elevated ICP or hydrocephalus in 11 patients (Group 3), of indication for repeated CVES in 13 patients (Group 4), or shunt dysfunction in three patients (Group 5). The average mean ICP for the whole cohort was 15.1 ± 5.5 mmHg and mean wave amplitude (MWA) 5.3 ± 2.2 mmHg. There was no significant difference in ICP parameters when compared between Groups 1-5. Fundoscopy revealed papilledema in five out of 32 children (15.6%). There were significantly higher parameters of pulsatile ICP (MWA) in patients with papilledema, but no statistically significant difference in parameters of static ICP. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of pediatric patients with CSS presenting with various diagnostic challenges, we found the diagnostic measurement of static and pulsatile ICP useful in selecting the optimal treatment modality and timing of surgery. Papilledema was associated with elevated pulsatile ICP, a parameter that in previous studies has been shown to correlate with impaired intracranial compliance.

Intracranial volume versus static and pulsatile intracranial pressure values in children with craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVE: Reduced intracranial volume (ICV) and raised intracranial pressure (ICP) are assumed to be principal pathophysiological mechanisms in childhood craniosynostosis. This study examined the association between ICV and ICP and whether ICV can be used to estimate the ICP. METHODS: The authors analyzed ICV and ICP measurements from children with craniosynostosis without concurrent hydrocephalus and from age-matched individuals without craniosynostosis who underwent diagnostic ICP measurement. RESULTS: The study included 19 children with craniosynostosis (mean age 2.2 ± 1.9 years) and 12 reference individuals without craniosynostosis (mean age 2.5 ± 1.6 years). There was no difference in ICV between the patient and reference cohorts. Both mean ICP (17.1 ± 5.6 mm Hg) and mean wave amplitude (5.9 ± 2.6 mm Hg) were higher in the patient cohort. The results disclosed no significant association between ICV and ICP values in the patient or reference cohorts, and no association was seen between change in ICV and ICP values after cranial vault expansion surgery (CVES) in 5 children in whom ICV and ICP were measured before and after CVES. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of children with craniosynostosis, there was no significant association between ICV and ICP values prior to CVES and no significant association between change in ICV and ICP values after CVES in a subset of patients. Therefore, ICV could not reliably estimate the ICP values. The authors suggest that intracranial hypertension in childhood craniosynostosis may not be caused by reduced ICV alone but rather by a distorted relationship between ICV and the volume of intracranial content (brain tissue, CSF, and blood).