ABSTRACT
The accuracy of the new SNAP index with the Bispectral index (BIS) to distinguish different states of propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia was compared in 19 female patients who were undergoing minor gynaecological surgery. Comparisons of the SNAP index, BIS, spectral edge frequency, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were performed. The ability of all parameters to distinguish between the steps of anaesthesia -awake vs. loss of response, awake vs. anaesthesia, anaesthesia vs. first reaction and anaesthesia vs. extubation - were analysed with the prediction probability. The prediction probability to differentiate between two interesting nuances of anaesthetic states -loss of response vs. first reaction - was calculated. Only the BIS showed no overlap between the investigated steps of anaesthesia. Both the SNAP index and BIS failed to differentiate the nuances of anaesthesia. The SNAP index and BIS were superior to mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate and spectral edge frequency in distinguishing between different steps of anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and provided useful additional information.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Combined/pharmacology , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Piperidines/pharmacology , Propofol/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Electroencephalography/methods , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Middle Aged , RemifentanilABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Measurement of "depth of anesthesia" is of enormous interest to the anesthesiologist. New monitor systems, based on the electroencephalogram (EEG) were developed. The aim of the present study was to compare the SNAP index and the Bispectral index during induction of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. METHODS: After IRB approval and written informed consent we investigated 19 female patients during minor gynecologic surgery. Target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol was increased in a step-by-step mode (0.5 micro g/kg) every 1 min until the patients lost response to the modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (MOAAS). 5 min after the patient lost response remifentanil 0.4 micro g/kg/min was started. Every 20 s SNAP index, BIS, spectral edge frequency, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate and MOASS were recorded. Prediction probability ( P(K)) was used to analyze the relationship of MOAAS, TCI propofol, and all investigated parameters. Changes after start of remifentanil were analyzed with Friedman and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: SNAP index ( P(K) = 0.91) and BIS ( P(K) = 1.0) were able to distinguish reliably between MOAAS = 5 and MOAAS = 0. Start of remifentanil infusion resulted in statistically significant changes for all parameters except the SNAP index (p > 0,05). CONCLUSIONS: SNAP index and BIS were reliable parameters to distinguish different levels of sedation, but SNAP index was not able to reflect the analgesic potency of remifentanil during propofol infusion.
