Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) ; 91(1-2): 11-8, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17217386

ABSTRACT

We have recently suggested that feeding the C18 polyunsaturated fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), instead of linoleic acid (LA) reduced body fat in mice. However, the difference in body fat did not reach statistical significance, which prompted us to carry out this study using more animals and diets with higher contents of ALA and LA so that the contrast would be greater. The diets contained either 12% (w/w) LA and 3% ALA or 12% ALA and 4% LA. A low-fat diet was used as control. The diets were fed for 35 days. The proportion of body fat was not influenced by the type of dietary fatty acid. Plasma total cholesterol and phospholipids were significantly lower in ALA-fed mice than in mice fed LA. Activities of enzymes in the fatty acid oxidation pathway were significantly raised by these two diets when compared with the control diet. alpha-Linolenic acid vs. LA did not affect fatty acid oxidation enzymes. In mice fed the diet with LA activities of enzymes of de novo fatty acid synthesis were significantly decreased when compared with mice fed the control diet. alpha-Linolenic acid vs. LA feeding did not influence lipogenic enzymes. It is concluded that feeding mice for 35 days with diets either rich in LA or ALA did not significantly influence body composition.


Subject(s)
Body Composition/drug effects , Linoleic Acid/administration & dosage , Liver/enzymology , alpha-Linolenic Acid/administration & dosage , Animals , Cholesterol/blood , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Linoleic Acid/metabolism , Lipids/biosynthesis , Lipogenesis , Liver/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Oxidation-Reduction , Phospholipids/blood , Random Allocation , Weaning , alpha-Linolenic Acid/metabolism
2.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) ; 89(9-10): 337-41, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16138864

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present experiment was to investigate whether deoxycholate and cholate would differ in their effectiveness of counteracting the inhibitory effect of calcium on fat digestibility in rats. Rats were fed one of four experimental diets, a diet low in calcium, high in calcium or high in calcium with either 0.5% sodium cholate or 0.5% sodium deoxycholate. Both deoxycholate and cholate supplementation of the high-calcium diet reduced feed intake and body-weight gain. Low-calcium intake increased fat digestibility. Supplemental bile acids partially counteracted the calcium-induced inhibition of fat digestion, cholate being more effective than deoxycholate. The outcome is explained by the suggestion that cholate is bound to the calcium phosphate sediment in the small intestinal lumen with less affinity than deoxycholate. As a result, more cholate than deoxycholate would be available to support the process of fat digestion. Rats fed cholate had higher liver and serum cholesterol concentrations than did the rats fed deoxycholate.


Subject(s)
Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Calcium/antagonists & inhibitors , Cholates/pharmacology , Deoxycholic Acid/pharmacology , Dietary Fats/metabolism , Digestion/drug effects , Animals , Cholesterol/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Weight Gain/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...