The African Green Monkey Model of Pneumonic Plague and US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Antimicrobials Under the Animal Rule.

BACKGROUND: Additional treatment options for pneumonic plague, the most severe form of infection by Yersinia pestis, are needed, as past US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals were not based on clinical trials that meet today's standards, and multiple drugs are sought to counter resistance or use in special populations. Due to the sporadic nature of outbreaks and the low number of pneumonic cases of disease, we sought FDA approval of antimicrobials for treatment under the Animal Efficacy Rule, where efficacy can be demonstrated in 1 or more well-characterized animal models that sufficiently represent human disease. METHODS: A model was developed in African green monkeys (AGMs) after challenge with a lethal dose of Y. pestis delivered as an aerosol, in 4 independent studies in 3 laboratories. The primary data points were bacteremia (daily), body temperature and heart rate (continuously monitored by telemetry), and survival. In antimicrobial efficacy studies, human-equivalent doses of gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and doxycycline were administered upon fever onset for 10 days. RESULTS: Disease in AGMs was similar to case reports of human disease. Fever was determined to be a reliable sign of disease and selected as a treatment trigger. Gentamicin was 60%-80% effective depending on the dose given to animals. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were found to be >90% efficacious. These data were submitted to FDA and plague indications were approved. Doxycycline was less effective. CONCLUSIONS: The AGM model of pneumonic plague is reproducible, well-characterized, and mimics human disease. It has been used to support plague indications for fluoroquinolones and to test the efficacy of additional antimicrobials.

Effect of Delaying Treatment on Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in the African Green Monkey Model of Pneumonic Plague.

BACKGROUND: Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, 2 fluoroquinolone antimicrobials, are ≥90% effective for the treatment of inhalational plague when administered within 2-6 hours of fever onset in African green monkeys (AGM). Based on data in the AGM model, these antimicrobials were approved under the Food and Drug Administration's Animal Efficacy Rule. However, that data did not address the issue of how long treatment with these antimicrobials would remain effective after fever onset. METHODS: The AGM model of pneumonic plague was used to explore the effect of delaying treatment with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin on efficacy. In 2 studies, AGMs were challenged with inhaled lethal doses of Yersinia pestis. Treatment with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was initiated from 0 to up to 30 hours after fever onset. RESULTS: Challenged animals all developed fever within 78 hours and were treated with ciprofloxacin (n = 27) or levofloxacin (n = 29) at various predetermined time points postfever. When administered 10 hours after fever onset, 10 days of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin treatment remained very effective (90 or 100%, respectively). The efficacy of both antimicrobials declined as treatment initiation was further delayed. Statistical analyses estimated the treatment delay times at which half of the AGMs were no longer expected to survive as 19.7 hours for ciprofloxacin and 26.5 hours for levofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is a narrow window following fever onset during which ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are fully effective treatment options for pneumonic plague in AGMs. Since the timing of disease is similar in humans and AGMs, these AGM data are reasonably likely to predict response times for treatment in humans.

The Cynomolgus Macaque Natural History Model of Pneumonic Tularemia for Predicting Clinical Efficacy Under the Animal Rule.

Francisella tularensis is a highly infectious Gram-negative bacterium that is the etiologic agent of tularemia in animals and humans and a Tier 1 select agent. The natural incidence of pneumonic tularemia worldwide is very low; therefore, it is not feasible to conduct clinical efficacy testing of tularemia medical countermeasures (MCM) in human populations. Development and licensure of tularemia therapeutics and vaccines need to occur under the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Animal Rule under which efficacy studies are conducted in well-characterized animal models that reflect the pathophysiology of human disease. The Tularemia Animal Model Qualification (AMQ) Working Group is seeking qualification of the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) model of pneumonic tularemia under Drug Development Tools Qualification Programs with the FDA based upon the results of studies described in this manuscript. Analysis of data on survival, average time to death, average time to fever onset, average interval between fever and death, and bacteremia; together with summaries of clinical signs, necropsy findings, and histopathology from the animals exposed to aerosolized F. tularensis Schu S4 in five natural history studies and one antibiotic efficacy study form the basis for the proposed cynomolgus macaque model. Results support the conclusion that signs of pneumonic tularemia in cynomolgus macaques exposed to 300-3,000 colony forming units (cfu) aerosolized F. tularensis Schu S4, under the conditions described herein, and human pneumonic tularemia cases are highly similar. Animal age, weight, and sex of animals challenged with 300-3,000 cfu Schu S4 did not impact fever onset in studies described herein. This study summarizes critical parameters and endpoints of a well-characterized cynomolgus macaque model of pneumonic tularemia and demonstrates this model is appropriate for qualification, and for testing efficacy of tularemia therapeutics under Animal Rule.

A Comparison of the Pathogenesis of Marburg Virus Disease in Humans and Nonhuman Primates and Evaluation of the Suitability of These Animal Models for Predicting Clinical Efficacy under the 'Animal Rule'.

Marburg virus outbreaks are sporadic, infrequent, brief, and relatively small in terms of numbers of subjects affected. In addition, outbreaks most likely will occur in remote regions where clinical trials are not feasible; therefore, definitive, well-controlled human efficacy studies to test the effectiveness of a drug or biologic product are not feasible. Healthy human volunteers cannot ethically be deliberately exposed to a lethal agent such as Marburg virus in order to test the efficacy of a therapy or preventive prior to licensure. When human efficacy studies are neither ethical nor feasible, the US Food and Drug Administration may grant marketing approval of a drug or biologic product under the 'Animal Rule,' through which demonstration of the efficacy of a product can be 'based on adequate and well-controlled animal efficacy studies when the results of those studies establish that the drug is reasonably likely to produce clinical benefit in humans.' This process requires that the pathogenic determinants of the disease in the animal model are similar to those that have been identified in humans. After reviewing primarily English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles, we here summarize the clinical manifestations of Marburg virus disease and the results of studies in NHP showing the characteristics and progression of the disease. We also include a detailed comparison of the characteristics of the human disease relative to those for NHP. This review reveals that the disease characteristics of Marburg virus disease are generally similar for humans and 3 NHP species: cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops).

Shifting the paradigm of coral-reef 'health' assessment.

Coral reefs are in crisis. Globally, our reefs are degrading at an accelerating rate and present methodologies for coral-reef 'health' assessment, although providing important information in describing these global declines, have been unable to halt these declines. These assessments are usually employed with no clear purpose and using uncorrelated methods resulting in a failure to prevent or mitigate coral reef deterioration. If we are to ever successfully intervene, we must move beyond the current paradigm, where assessments and intervention decisions are based primarily on descriptive science and embrace a paradigm that promotes both descriptive and mechanistic science to recognize a problem, and recognize it before it becomes a crisis. The primary methodology in this alternative paradigm is analogous to the clinical and diagnostic methodologies of evidence-based medicine. Adopting this new paradigm can provide the evidence to target management actions on those stressors currently impacting reef ecosystems as well as providing a means for proactive management actions to avert irreversible habitat decline.