Systems changes to prevent severe hyperbilirubinemia and promote breastfeeding: pilot approaches.

Providing safe and effective care requires coordination among the multiple levels of the health care system. These levels comprise the newborn (patient, family and community), nursery or primary care practice (microsystem), hospital or managed care organization (macro-organization) and policy, payment or regulatory issues (environmental context). Contemporary care practices associated with childbirth and early newborn care often reflect disruptions in coordination of these processes and place newborns at risk for poor outcomes. For example, with routine early postpartum discharge, often at less than 48 h after vaginal birth, the peak of serum bilirubin at 3 to 5 days of age typically occurs at home, rather than observed by clinicians in a newborn nursery. In addition, lactation is rarely well established by early discharge and support is often inadequate, increasing the risk of hyperbilirubinemia and discontinuation of breastfeeding. Also, late preterm infants are frequently cared for in the newborn nursery, although they often have difficulty establishing oral feeding and are at substantially higher risk for severe hyperbilirubinemia than infants born at term. Finally, pediatric follow-up is often delayed beyond the first week, after the optimal time for continued assessment of jaundice and lactation. The American Academy of Pediatrics Safe and Healthy Beginnings Initiative, a pilot quality improvement project, will target newborn nurseries, primary care practices and coordination between these sites using a systems-based approach to facilitate implementation of the 2004 guideline for management of hyperbilirubinemia.

Principles of patient safety in pediatrics.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and its members are committed to improving the health care system to provide the best and safest health care for infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. In response to a 1999 Institute of Medicine report on building a safer health system, a set of principles was established to guide the profession in designing a health care system that maximizes quality of care and minimizes medical errors through identification and resolution. This set of principles provides direction on setting up processes to identify and learn from errors, developing performance standards and expectations for safety, and promoting leadership and knowledge.

Institutional policies of U.S. medical schools regarding tenure, promotion, and benefits for part-time faculty.

PURPOSE: To collect data on institutional policies regarding tenure, promotions, and benefits for part-time faculty at U.S. medical schools and determine the extent to which part-time work is a feasible or attractive option for academic physicians. METHOD: In July 1996, the authors sent a 29-item questionnaire regarding tenure, promotions, and benefit policies for part-time faculty to respondents identified by the deans' offices of medical schools in the United States and Puerto Rico. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses. RESULTS: Respondents from 104 of 126 medical schools (83%) completed the questionnaire; 58 responded that their schools had written policies about tenure, promotion, or benefits for part-time faculty. Tenure. Of the 95 medical schools with tenure systems, 25 allowed part-time faculty to get tenure and 76 allowed for extending the time to tenure. Allowable reasons to slow the tenure clock included medical leave (65), maternity leave (65), paternity leave (54), other leave of absence (59). Only 23 allowed part-time status as a reason to slow the tenure clock. Policies written by the dean's office and from schools in the midwest or west were more favorable to part-time faculty's being allowed to get tenure. Promotions. The majority of respondents reported that it was possible for part-time faculty to serve as clinical assistant, assistant, associate, and full professors. Benefits. The majority of schools offered retirement benefits and health, dental, disability, and life insurance to part-time faculty, although in many cases part-time faculty had to buy additional coverage to match that of full-time faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Most medical schools do not have policies that foster tenure for part-time faculty, although many allow for promotion and offer a variety of benefits to part-time faculty.

Internal medicine-pediatrics combined residency graduates: what are they doing now? Results of a survey.

BACKGROUND: While the number of internal medicine-pediatrics (med/peds) residency training programs has increased considerably in the past decade, questions continue to be raised about career paths of the graduates of these programs. It is uncertain whether med/peds graduates follow a generalist career path and whether they continue to practice both specialties. OBJECTIVE: To determine the career outcomes of graduates of med/peds residency programs. DESIGN: A survey questionnaire of graduates of med/peds residency programs. METHODS: The computer databases of the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Internal Medicine were used to identify 1482 individuals who had completed training in combined med/peds residency programs between 1986 and 1995 and who had applied to either board for certification. The survey questionnaire was mailed to all graduates identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time spent in professional activity (patient care, teaching, administration, and research), site of principal clinical activity, ages of the patient population, types of hospital privileges, practice organization, subspecialty activity, night and weekend coverage arrangements, community size of practice, involvement in teaching, and membership in professional organizations. RESULTS: Of the total group of 1482 graduates, 87.3% are certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine, 91.3% by the American Board of Pediatrics, and 81.6% by both boards. The survey was completed by 1005 graduates (67.8%). The principal activity of almost 70% of the graduates was direct patient care. Most graduates cared for patients of all ages. More than half of all respondents noted that their principal clinical site is a community office practice. Eighty-five percent managed patients who require hospitalization. Approximately 50% of respondents had a medical school appointment. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest survey to date of med/peds graduates, provides strong evidence that most med/peds graduates are practicing generalists who care for adults and children. In addition, the fact that 80% of graduates achieve dual board certification suggests that these physicians are well qualified to care for the spectrum of health care needs of children and adults. Because the changing US health care system mandates a strong primary care base, these physicians will play a small but important role in providing high-quality generalist care.

Linking clinical and public health approaches to improve access to health care for socially disadvantaged mothers and children. A feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of combining home- and office-based interventions to improve access to health care and health outcomes of Medicaid-eligible mothers and infants. DESIGN: Randomized trial in 2 counties in North Carolina (1 rural, 1 urban). Information on health and developmental outcomes was obtained by face-to-face interviews, medical chart abstractions, hospital medical records, and state data tapes. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-three Medicaid-eligible first-time pregnant women in their third trimester and their subsequently born infants, who were followed up until they were 6 months old, and 3 pediatric practices and 1 family practice. INTERVENTIONS: Coordinated home visit and office intervention, office intervention, and usual care. Home visits by 3 public health nurses provided parental education and social support and linked families with needed community resources. Women in the office intervention group were encouraged to seek health care for their infants from one of the primary care practices. Participating offices received assistance with Medicaid billing, help developing a system to improve preventive care, and customized patient education materials. RESULTS: Mothers reported that the nurses helped them in areas related to the content of the program. An office system for prevention was developed and implemented in all 4 practices for study patients. Families in the intervention groups were more likely than control families to have had a prenatal visit with a pediatrician (P = .01, chi 2), a primary care office as the regular source of sick care (P = .02, chi 2), and less waiting time (P = .02, Student t test). They were also more likely to recall receiving patient education materials (P = .007, chi 2). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to link clinical and public health approaches to improve the quality and effectiveness of care for socially disadvantaged children. Such interventions should be tested in defined populations.

The delivery of immunizations and other preventive services in private practices.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the proportion of children cared for in private practices who are fully immunized and have been screened for anemia, tuberculosis (TB), and lead poisoning by 2 years of age. DESIGN: Cross-sectional chart review. SETTING: Fifteen private pediatric practices in central North Carolina (11 chosen randomly). PATIENTS: One thousand thirty-two randomly selected 2-year-old children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of children immunized and screened for anemia, TB and lead poisoning by 24 months of age and immunization and screening rates of the practices. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of the children were fully immunized at 24 months of age; the rates among practices varied widely (38% to 82%). Sixty-eight percent of the children had been screened for anemia, 57% had been screened for TB, and 3% had been screened for lead poisoning. Physicians overestimated the proportions of fully immunized children in their practices by an average of 10% (range, -3% to 17%). The median number of well child visits by 2 years of age was 5 (range, 0 to 14), and only 19% of the entire sample made 8 or more well child visits, the number recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics in the first 18 months of life. The numbers of well child and non-well child visits were the strongest predictors of complete immunization. Practice characteristics associated with being fully immunized included the use of preventive services prompting sheets (eg, flow sheets) in the medical records, not seeing the same physician for all well child care, and having nurses review patients' immunization status during their visits to the office. CONCLUSIONS: Underimmunization and inadequate screening are significant problems in private pediatric practices in North Carolina. Physicians are unaware of the rates of underimmunization in their offices.

The rest of the access-to-care puzzle. Addressing structural and personal barriers to health care for socially disadvantaged children.

A mother brings her 2-year-old child to the office at 4:30 Friday afternoon. The child has been seen only once in the practice for an episode of otitis media. The child missed her follow-up appointment. When the receptionist asks why the child is here, the mother responds that she was able to get a ride today with a neighbor who has an appointment with another physician in the practice. The child is not covered by health insurance. The mother did not bring her immunization record and is not certain what preventive care the child has received in the past.

Parents' behavior and attitudes toward screening children for high serum cholesterol levels.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, concerned that pediatric cholesterol screening may lead to mislabeling and overly restrictive diets, stresses laboratory confirmation and nutritional follow-up for children with elevated cholesterol levels. Parents' behavior and attitudes toward screening children for high cholesterol were studied. During an 8-week period in summer of 1989 all children 2 through 15 years of age seen for well-child examinations at a community pediatric group practice were offered cholesterol screening by finger-stick method. Most parents were well-educated and white. Of 439 children screened, 134 (31%) had cholesterol levels above the recommended cutoff point of 175 mg/dL (75th percentile). Only 63 children returned for confirmatory lipid panels; parents of children who did not return were interviewed. Reasons for noncompliance included "not sure test machine was accurate" (67%); "child too traumatized by finger stick" (47%); and "will try low-cholesterol diet before recheck" (40%). A third of these parents believed that confirmation of an elevated cholesterol level "would make the child worry too much." Only 29% of these parents talked with a dietician. In this middle-class, well-educated population, a large proportion of children had elevated screening cholesterol values, but few complied with American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. As a result, many children may be mislabeled as hypercholesterolemic and may not benefit from screening.

Factors associated with pediatricians' participation in Medicaid in North Carolina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relative importance of factors influencing pediatricians' participation in Medicaid in North Carolina. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nonacademic primary care pediatricians in direct patient care at least 50% of the time; 332 (85%) of the 389 eligible pediatricians responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of pediatricians who restricted Medicaid patients' access to their practices. The association between restricting access and the following factors was assessed: Medicaid reimbursement, pediatricians' demographic characteristics, knowledge of the Medicaid program, attitudes toward Medicaid patients and the Medicaid program, and beliefs about whether other physicians were available to care for Medicaid patients. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of pediatricians restricted Medicaid patients' access to their practices. The proportion of pediatricians restricting access was 62% in cities, 13% in medium-sized towns, and 12% in small towns (P less than .001), but the proportion of pediatricians in cities who restricted access varied from 87% to 22%. Pediatricians who received a higher proportion of their usual fee were less likely to restrict Medicaid patients' access. The relationship between Medicaid payment and restricted access was substantially weakened after controlling for the following factors: (1) the size of the community, (2) pediatricians' attitudes toward Medicaid payment, (3) their perceptions that they were too busy to care for Medicaid patients, and (4) whether there were other resources for the care of Medicaid patients. At comparable levels of payment, rural pediatricians were about six times less likely than urban pediatricians to restrict access. Pediatricians who knew less about Medicaid reimbursement also restricted access more often. Whether or not they restricted access to new Medicaid patients, pediatricians provided acute, preventive, hospital, and emergency care to the Medicaid patients who were already in their practices. CONCLUSIONS: Existing resources for the care of Medicaid patients, pediatricians' economic dependence on Medicaid, and the local norms of practice may be important factors in pediatricians' decision to participate in Medicaid. Increasing reimbursement will have only modest effects on Medicaid participation. Strategies to improve participation should also address pediatricians' knowledge of the Medicaid program and enlist the support of community physicians.

Screening for hypercholesterolemia in children: the missing links.

A useful screening program depends on a serious and prevalent disease, an acceptable, valid, and reliable test, and an efficacious and cost-effective intervention in the population of interest. Although coronary heart disease is still the leading cause of death in the United States, screening children's lipids to detect those at high risk is problematic. Long-term studies starting in childhood have so far revealed less than optimal accuracy of a child's serum cholesterol to predict an adult level. Information regarding reliability of lipid measurements that could improve accuracy is sparse. No interventions have proven beneficial compared to current practice, and the costs of an extensive screening program, including misclassification, side effects, labeling, and treatment, are likely to be high. Until more information regarding these factors is available, widespread screening of serum cholesterol in children cannot be recommended.