ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence on the practical application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening is needed. METHODS: Consented participants were screened for DR using retinal imaging with AI interpretation from March 2021 to June 2021 at four diabetes clinics in Rwanda. Additionally, images were graded by a UK National Health System-certified retinal image grader. DR grades based on the International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy with a grade of 2.0 or higher were considered referable. The AI system was designed to detect optic nerve and macular anomalies outside of DR. A vertical cup to disc ratio of 0.7 and higher and/or macular anomalies recognised at a cut-off of 60% and higher were also considered referable by AI. RESULTS: Among 827 participants (59.6% women (n=493)) screened by AI, 33.2% (n=275) were referred for follow-up. Satisfaction with AI screening was high (99.5%, n=823), and 63.7% of participants (n=527) preferred AI over human grading. Compared with human grading, the sensitivity of the AI for referable DR was 92% (95% CI 0.863%, 0.968%), with a specificity of 85% (95% CI 0.751%, 0.882%). Of the participants referred by AI: 88 (32.0%) were for DR only, 109 (39.6%) for DR and an anomaly, 65 (23.6%) for an anomaly only and 13 (4.73%) for other reasons. Adherence to referrals was highest for those referred for DR at 53.4%. CONCLUSION: DR screening using AI led to accurate referrals from diabetes clinics in Rwanda and high rates of participant satisfaction, suggesting AI screening for DR is practical and acceptable.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This trial was designed to determine if artificial intelligence (AI)-supported diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening improved referral uptake in Rwanda. Design: The Rwanda Artificial Intelligence for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening (RAIDERS) study was an investigator-masked, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Participants: Patients ≥ 18 years of age with known diabetes who required referral for DR based on AI interpretation. Methods: The RAIDERS study screened for DR using retinal imaging with AI interpretation implemented at 4 facilities from March 2021 through July 2021. Eligible participants were assigned randomly (1:1) to immediate feedback of AI grading (intervention) or communication of referral advice after human grading was completed 3 to 5 days after the initial screening (control). Main Outcome Measures: Difference between study groups in the rate of presentation for referral services within 30 days of being informed of the need for a referral visit. Results: Of the 823 clinic patients who met inclusion criteria, 275 participants (33.4%) showed positive findings for referable DR based on AI screening and were randomized for inclusion in the trial. Study participants (mean age, 50.7 years; 58.2% women) were randomized to the intervention (n = 136 [49.5%]) or control (n = 139 [50.5%]) groups. No significant intergroup differences were found at baseline, and main outcome data were available for analyses for 100% of participants. Referral adherence was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group (70/136 [51.5%]) versus the control group (55/139 [39.6%]; P = 0.048), a 30.1% increase. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.05; P < 0.0001), male sex (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.22-3.51; P = 0.007), rural residence (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.07-3.01; P = 0.027), and intervention group (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.05-2.88; P = 0.031) were statistically significantly associated with acceptance of referral in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Immediate feedback on referral status based on AI-supported screening was associated with statistically significantly higher referral adherence compared with delayed communications of results from human graders. These results provide evidence for an important benefit of AI screening in promoting adherence to prescribed treatment for diabetic eye care in sub-Saharan Africa.
ABSTRACT
Glaucomatous optic neuropathy is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Diagnosis and monitoring of disease involves integrating information from the clinical examination with subjective data from visual field testing and objective biometric data that includes pachymetry, corneal hysteresis, and optic nerve and retinal imaging. This intricate process is further complicated by the lack of clear definitions for the presence and progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, which makes it vulnerable to clinician interpretation error. Artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-enabled workflows have been proposed as a plausible solution. Applications derived from this field of computer science can improve the quality and robustness of insights obtained from clinical data that can enhance the clinician's approach to patient care. This review clarifies key terms and concepts used in AI literature, discusses the current advances of AI in glaucoma, elucidates the clinical advantages and challenges to implementing this technology, and highlights potential future applications.
