[Report of the French "conférence nationale de l'échographie obstétricale et fœtale" (CNEOF)-- recommendations for focused prenatal ultrasound]. / Rapport de la conférence nationale de l'échographie obstétricale et fœtale (CNEOF)--recommandations pour l'échographie focalisée.

The conference has among its functions, to promote a quality assurance policy for obstetrics and foetal ultrasound scans by participating in the development of an information strategy for the professionals and the public on the interest and limits of these techniques, and in the development of rules for good practice. Thus, the conference produced in 2005 a good practice's recommendations report concerning the screening of ultrasound scans, with an actualised version in 2015, and has published in 2014 a similar report concerning second line prenatal ultrasound. The conference complements these recommendations by characterizing the third type of ultrasound scan, the "focused ultrasound scan", which is a daily tool for every practitioner in obstetrics.

How singleton breech babies at term are born in France: a survey of data from the AUDIPOG network.

Based on data from the AUDIPOG sentinel network between 1994 and 2010, we can say that the rate of singleton breech presentation at term is 3% and remains unchanged despite an external cephalic version rate of 35%. The total cesarean section rate is currently 75%. This rate increased by nearly 20% after the Hannah publication in 2000, regardless of the type of breech and type of maternity unit. The rate of planned cesarean sections increased in particular, going from 40% to 60%, and even reaching 67% for footling breech presentations. The rate is higher in type I maternity units than in type II or III. This cesarean section rate has been stable since 2005 and has even decreased for the Frank breech. The average rate of external cephalic version remains stable at around 23%. The episiotomy rate is 28%. The rate of babies transferred to neonatology units is higher for breech babies at term than for babies presenting cephalically (3.9% compared to 2.9%), but the newborns most often transferred are those born by cesarean section (4.1% compared to 3.4%).

[Report of the French Comité national technique de l'échographie de dépistage prénatal (CNTEDP)--Recommendations for second line prenatal ultrasound]. / Rapport du Comité national technique de l'échographie de dépistage prénatal (CNTEDP): recommandations pour l'échographie de diagnostic.

OBJECTIVES: The committee has among its functions, to promote a quality assurance policy for obstetrics and foetal ultrasound scans by participating in the development of an information strategy for the professionals and the public on the interest and limits of these techniques, and in the development of rules for good practice. Thus, the committee produced in 2005 a good practice's recommendations report concerning the screening ultrasound scans. It pursued its work with a similar report concerning this time the "diagnostic" prenatal ultrasound or second line prenatal ultrasound. The present report has set its objective to define as precisely as possible the content of a "diagnostic" ultrasound scan and what should be expected from it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of experts from the committee members has functioned as a task team that met on a regular basis. First, in the context of a professional consensus and a review of the literature, it determined the clinical goals in regard to the indication of the "diagnostic" ultrasound scan. After discussing different formats of the scan test procedure, some intuitive hypotheses on the content of the test were developed. Each criteria was validated by the group of experts with a statistics' definition and a diagnosis' capacity. The hypotheses were finally validated or discarded after confrontation with the data of the literature. Finally, the content of the report was discussed during the plenary sessions of the CNTEDP, the National Committee on the Technical aspect for PreNatal Ultrasound Screening. All the items validated in format document have been the subject of a consensus with a right to veto. The preliminary report was reviewed by a group of six readers not members of the CNTEPD. RESULTS: The "diagnostic" ultrasound scan test is organized in two parts: one common part made of the content of the screening test, to which is added the study of the anatomic structures and taking some additional pictures. The sonologist must then do a specific scan study for the organ suspected or diagnosed with an anomaly. Subsequently, a series of ten format documents per anomaly is proposed to guide the examiner (i.e., abdomen, chest, heart, genitourinary, cerebrospinal, skeletal and limbs, IUGR, polyhydramnios, infection, twin pregnancy). These documents suggest a check-list of items to study during the scan, specific pictures to take, and, give some comments on the management plan. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The CPDPN, the Multidisciplinary Committee for PreNatal Diagnosis, since it was established in 1994, has contributed to structure most of the activity of the prenatal diagnosis, but did not answer the question of the quality of the second line prenatal ultrasound. Screening ultrasound, and focused ultrasound scan are not "levels" in the scan procedure, but different and supplementary studies contributing to the quality of the mother and her foetus follow-up. This report of the CNTEDP, in defining the content of this scan test, clarifies the objectives of the diagnostic test compared to the screening test, and subsequently gives the public a better understanding of what is expected or due in regard to our prenatal screening strategy. A reliable second level scan, affordable and consistent, is a label of good quality for our prenatal strategy. The recommendations of the committee should be understood in a large perspective of quality assurance, that includes an initial and a continuous medical education, a quality control system for the echograph, and a procedure to inform the public.

[Frequency, causes and risk factors of postpartum haemorrhage: a population-based study in 106 French maternity units]. / Incidence, étiologies et facteurs de risque de l'hémorragie du post-partum : étude en population dans 106 maternités françaises.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence, to describe the aetiology and to identify the risk factors of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective study conducted in 106 French maternity units of six perinatal networks between December 2004 and November 2006. PPH was defined by a blood loss superior to 500 mL or necessitating an examination of the uterus, or a peripartum haemoglobin drop superior to 2 g/dL. Severe PPH was defined by at least one of these criteria : peripartum haemoglobin drop superior or equal to 4 g/dL, embolization, conservative surgical procedure, hysterectomy, transfusion, transfer to intensive care or death. RESULTS: The incidence of PPH was 6.4% [CI 95% 6.3-6.5] with variations between maternity units from 1.5% to 22.0%; incidence of severe PPH was 1.7% [CI 95% 1.6-1.8] with variations between units from 0% to 4%. Atony was the main aetiology of PPH, whatever the mode of delivery and severity. The risk factors identified were those classically described in the literature. CONCLUSION: In these six French perinatal networks, in 2005-2006, the PPH profile was characterized by an incidence of severe forms higher than previous population-based estimates from other countries. This suggests a more frequent aggravation of PPH and the implication of inadequate PPH management.

[Intervention of psychological and ethical professionals of human science in obstetrical morbidity and mortality conferences]. / L'intervention des sciences humaines en psychologie et en éthique dans les revues de morbi-mortalité en obstétrique.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the defence mechanisms manifested by medical staff which could disturb the decision making, revealed by professionals of human science (PHS) in morbidity and mortality conferences (MMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Application of two methods of psychological intervention in MMC, conducted between March 1st, 2009 and November 30, 2010, in 20 randomized maternity among five perinatal networks: the method of inter-active problem solving targeted at the functioning of the teams and the method for developing professional practice centred on individual. The data collection was realized during analyse of case in MMC, with note-taking by two pair PHS. The oral expressions of RMM' participant were secondarily re-written, analyzed and classed by theme. RESULTS: Fifty-four MMC were performed. The mechanisms of defence have been identified by PHS intervention in MMC: denial of situation, pact of denegation, rift and overprotection. They were be identified by two PHS intervention methods, this consolidates these results. This intervention began staff medical to transformation at different level, in particular to improve the capacity of cooperation. CONCLUSION: The identification of the mechanisms of defence in MMC enables staff medical to improve communication and quality relationship between healthcare professionals. This could constitute an actual factor of practices improvement. However, complementary studies must be performed to confirm this hypothesis.

[Practices for management of grave postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal delivery: a population-based study in 106 French maternity units]. / Prise en charge des hémorragies graves du post-partum après un accouchement par voie basse : étude en population dans 106 maternités françaises.

OBJECTIVES: Describe management of severe postpartum haemorrhages (PPH) and its compliance with national guidelines and identify determinants of non-optimal care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Population-based cohort study of 1379 women with severe PPH due to uterine atony after vaginal delivery, conducted in 106 French maternity units between December 2004 and November 2006. Severe PPH was defined by a peripartum haemoglobin drop of 4g/dL or more, blood loss of 1000 mL or more, hysterectomy, or transfer to intensive care for PPH. The frequency of each recommended procedure for the management of PPH was described. Associations between quality of care and both individual and institutional characteristics were assessed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Management of severe PPH was not optimal in 65.9% of cases. The recommended components that were applied least often were administration of second line uterotonics, and transfusion of patients with a low haemoglobin. After adjustment for individual characteristics, the risk of either non- or suboptimal care was significantly higher in non-university public maternity units (aOR 2.62 [95% CI: 1.49-4.54]) compared with university hospital units, in units with fewer than 2000 annual deliveries (aOR 2.32 [95% CI: 1.49-3.57]), and in units without an obstetrician always present (aOR 1.96 [95% CI: 1.26-3.03]). CONCLUSIONS: Management practices for severe PPH can be improved, to an extent that varies by component of care and type of hospital. A qualitative approach should help to identify the individual and organizational factors explaining why guidelines are not fully applied.

Multifaceted intervention to decrease the rate of severe postpartum haemorrhage: the PITHAGORE6 cluster-randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Decreasing the prevalence of severe postpartum haemorrhages (PPH) is a major obstetrical challenge. These are often considered to be associated with substandard initial care. Strategies to increase the appropriateness of early management of PPH must be assessed. We tested the hypothesis that a multifaceted intervention aimed at increasing the translation into practice of a protocol for early management of PPH, would reduce the incidence of severe PPH. DESIGN: Cluster-randomised trial. POPULATION: 106 maternity units in six French regions. METHODS: Maternity units were randomly assigned to receive the intervention, or to have the protocol passively disseminated. The intervention combined outreach visits to discuss the protocol in each local context, reminders, and peer reviews of severe incidents, and was implemented in each maternity hospital by a team pairing an obstetrician and a midwife. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of severe PPH, defined as a composite of one or more of: transfusion, embolisation, surgical procedure, transfer to intensive care, peripartum haemoglobin decrease of 4 g/dl or more, death. The main secondary outcomes were PPH management practices. RESULTS: The mean rate of severe PPH was 1.64% (SD 0.80) in the intervention units and 1.65% (SD 0.96) in control units; difference not significant. Some elements of PPH management were applied more frequently in intervention units-help from senior staff (P = 0.005), or tended to - second-line pharmacological treatment (P = 0.06), timely blood test (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: This educational intervention did not affect the rate of severe PPH as compared with control units, although it improved some practices.

[In France, prevention of vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection must be improved. A questionnaire survey in Picardie]. / En France, la prévention de la transmission verticale de l'hépatite B est à améliorer! À propos d'une enquête en Picardie.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to study the conditions of practice and professionals' experiences for vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We sent a questionnaire survey to obstetricians and midwifes of all the 18 maternity clinics of the region (22,000 deliveries per year), both public and private. We also collected the protocols. RESULTS: Mean response rate was 66% for obstetricians and 79% for midwifes. When the mother is vaccinated against hepatitis B virus, 82% of obstetricians and 80% of midwifes performed the HBsAg screening. When the HBsAg screening is not available at delivery, the emergency dosage is performed by 86% of obstetricians et 91% of midwifes. Eight out of nine protocols were not in agreement with the guidelines and were poorly convenient; only one was pertinent. Discharges instructions for follow-up must be improved. CONCLUSION: Improvement programs must be implemented in the clinics (teaching sessions and assistance in preparing protocols) on a multidisciplinary basis. A national mobilisation, such as a consensus conference, is needed because even hepatitis B vaccination in France is poorly implemented.

Incidence and management of postpartum haemorrhage following the dissemination of guidelines in a network of 16 maternity units in France.

BACKGROUND: In France obstetric haemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal death. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the management of postpartum haemorrhage at individual maternity units followed guidelines established by the Aurore Network. METHODS: A descriptive study was carried out in 16 maternity units of the Aurore network between October 2004 and September 2005. Cases and data were prospectively identified and collected. RESULTS: Postpartum haemorrhage occurred in 1144 of 21 350 deliveries, an overall incidence of 5.4+/-0.3%. Of these, 316 cases were rated as severe. Diagnosis was clinical in 82.5% of severe cases and 77.5% of non-severe cases; the remainder were detected by postpartum laboratory tests. Uterotonic agents were given prophylactically to 46.7% of the 896 patients following vaginal delivery. In cases in which postpartum haemorrhage was due to uterine atony, 83.1% of women underwent examination of the uterine cavity and 96.3% received oxytocin, which proved therapeutic. Sulprostone was administered to 39.5% cases of persistent postpartum haemorrhage. A uterotonic was given prophylactically to 85.4% of the 247 patients at caesarean delivery. Oxytocin was therapeutic in 94.8% of cases of uterine atony. Sulprostone was administered in 84.4% of cases of persistent postpartum haemorrhage. CONCLUSION: The regional guidelines issued by the Aurore network were only partially followed. More effective guideline dissemination and implementation is required to improve the prevention and management of confirmed haemorrhage.

[Audipog perinatal network 2004-2005. Part 2: assessment of medical practices]. / Réseau Sentinelle Audipog 2004-2005. Partie 2 : évaluation des pratiques professionnelles.

OBJECTIVE: To describe specific clinical practices in France in 2004-2005 based on data from the Audipog sentinel network. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The database for 2004 and 2005 covers 71406 pregnancies from 86 maternity units throughout the year. We constructed a random subsample each year by including only the births occurring during a single month for each maternity ward. Our study therefore analyzes 6987 pregnancies in 2004 and 7648 pregnancies in 2005. RESULTS: Among the very preterm (<33 weeks of gestation) infants from multiple pregnancies, 77.4% were born in level 3 hospitals in 2000-2001, and only 44.9% in 2004-2005 (p<0.0001). Among the very preterm infants from singleton pregnancies, the percentage born in level 3 maternity hospitals rose between 1996-1997 and 2004-2005 (55% versus 73%; p=0.001). The rate of corticosteroid therapy before delivery among very preterm infants did not change significantly between 2000 and 2005 (p=0.58). The cesarean rate rose from 14% in 1994 to 20.0% in 2005. The percentage of actively managed third stages of labor increased from 1994-1995 to 2005 (6.2% versus 31.3%). Fewer episiotomies were performed: 56% in 1994-1995 and 41.3% in 2005. Exclusive breast-feeding rose from 51.2% in 2000-2001 to 58.5% in 2005 (p<0.0001). Early discharge increased between 1994-1995 and 2005 (p<0.0001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Indicators monitoring implementation of some of the national clinical practice guidelines have improved slightly over time, although most often before the publication of these guidelines.

[Audipog perinatal network. Part 1: principal perinatal health indicators, 2004-2005]. / Réseau sentinelle Audipog 2004-2005. Partie 1 : résultats des principaux indicateurs périnatals.

OBJECTIVE: To present the principal perinatal indicators for 2004-2005, based on data from the Audipog sentinel network. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The database for 2004 and 2005 covers 71,406 pregnancies from 86 maternity units throughout the year. We constructed a random subsample each year by including only the births occurring during a single month for each maternity ward. Our study therefore analyzes 6987 pregnancies in 2004 and 7648 pregnancies in 2005. RESULTS: The number of women working during pregnancy increased between 2004 and 2005 (62.3% versus 66.3%) (p=0.0008) as did the percentage with a postsecondary education (35.1% versus 41.9%) (p<0.0001). The percentage of amniocenteses declined (10.4% versus 7.9%) (p<0.0001). Use of prenatal care improved: more women had prenatal visits before week 14 (30.5% versus 33.9%) (p=0.0002), and fewer women had no prenatal care at all (1.1% versus 0.4%) (p=0.0003). The percentage of preterm deliveries was 6.4% in 2004 and 7% in 2005 (p=0.14) and the percentage of induced preterm deliveries was 37% in 2004 and 41.2% in 2005 (p=0.18). The cesarean rate was essentially stable (19 and 19.2%) and the rate of instrumental intervention in vaginal deliveries fell from 13.1% in 2004 to 11.2% in 2005 (p=0.0015). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The rates of cesarean and of preterm deliveries remained stable between 2004 and 2005, but the rate of induced preterm deliveries rose. These indicators are consistent with trends that began earlier.

[Prevention and early management of immediate postpartum haemorrhage: policies in six perinatal networks in France]. / Politiques de prévention et de prise en charge précoce de l'hémorragie du post-partum immédiat dans six réseaux de maternités françaises.

OBJECTIVES: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) constitutes the leading cause of maternal deaths in France, and the majority of these deaths are preventable. The objective of this study was to ascertain policies for prevention and early management of PPH in maternity units, and to compare the results with scientific evidence. The survey was part of the Euphrates European project, and was conducted in France in 2003 before national recommendations for clinical practice related to PPH were launched. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional declarative survey was conducted in six perinatal networks representing 132 maternity units. A postal questionnaire was sent to all units. Main outcomes measured were stated policies for prevention, diagnosis and management of PPH. RESULTS: There was no definition of PPH in one out of four units, and no written protocol for PPH management in one out of six. Policies of using preventive uterotonics were widespread, but variation was observed concerning the timing of administration, and association with the other components of active management of the third stage of labour. Policies about drugs used for management of PPH also varied. CONCLUSION: Variations in policies show firstly that evidence-based improvement in practice is possible, and secondly that further research is needed on poorly documented aspects of PPH management.

Application of the French guidelines for preventing neonatal group B streptococcal disease in a university hospital.

This study evaluated the application of the French guidelines for prevention of neonatal group B streptococcus (GBS) infections. The prevalence of GBS vaginal carriage by pregnant women during the study period was 6%. Less than 50% of pregnant women testing positive for GBS were treated with at least two doses of antibiotics during labour, and most received only one dose or no antibiotics. In addition, several neonates were colonised or infected by GBS although their mothers were GBS-negative. These results are consistent with vaginal screening having a poor sensitivity, as suggested by the low prevalence of GBS carriage.