Monitoring the exposure of rats to 2-acetylaminofluorene by the estimation of mutagenic activity in excreta, sister-chromatid exchanges in peripheral blood cells and DNA adducts in peripheral blood, liver and spleen.

The sensitivity of various methods suitable for biomonitoring the exposure to genotoxicants was compared in an animal model. The results were related to the presence of genotoxic effects in the target organ. Groups of male Wistar rats were given one oral dose of 0, 0.1, 10 or 200 mg 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF)/5 ml dimethyl sulphoxide/kg body weight. Peripheral blood cells, excreta, liver and spleen were collected at different time intervals after dosing. Mutagenicity in urine and extracts of faeces was determined using the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium TA98 with and without S9 and with and without beta-glucuronidase. Genotoxic effects were studied by measuring DNA-adduct formation in lymphocytes, liver and spleen, and sister-chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in lymphocytes. DNA adducts were measured with immunochemical techniques and postlabelling methods. Mutagenicity in urine and faeces, collected during the first 24 h after treatment, was detected at 2-AAF doses of 1 mg/kg b.w. and higher. At these doses DNA adducts also became apparent in the liver, the main target organ for tumour induction by 2-AAF. The adduct detected appeared to be the N-(deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-2-AAF adduct. There was no evidence of the presence of any other types of DNA adducts. At doses of 1 and 10 mg/kg b.w. no mutagenicity was detected in excreta collected during the second and third day after dosing. The DNA-adduct level in liver cells of the 1 mg/kg b.w. group was maximal 24 h after dosing. At 200 mg/kg b.w. a delay in excretion of mutagenicity with urine and faeces was seen and at 10 and 200 mg/kg b.w. the amount of DNA adducts continued to increase with time after dosing. At 24 and 48 h after treatment with 10 mg, the adduct levels were of the same order of magnitude as those found after the 20-fold higher dose. This points to overloading of the metabolizing system which in combination with the enterohepatic circulation, may lead to an increased retention of 2-AAF in the body. A slightly increased incidence of SCEs of doubtful significance was seen in lymphocytes, but only at the very high dose of 200 mg/kg b.w. No DNA adducts could be detected in blood lymphocytes or spleen cells at any of the dose levels applied, either with the immunochemical or with the postlabelling method.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Use of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against DNA adducts for the detection of DNA lesions in isolated DNA and in single cells.

Interaction of genotoxic chemicals with their intracellular target, i.e., DNA, may result in the formation of covalent adducts. Various methods have been developed to estimate exposure to genotoxic chemicals by means of molecular dosimetry of DNA adducts. Such experiments have generally been carried out with radiolabeled genotoxicants administered in vitro to cultured cells or in vivo to laboratory animals. Biomonitoring of human exposure to genotoxic chemicals requires methods to detect very small quantities of nonradioactive DNA adducts in limited amounts of sample. Attention has been devoted to the development of immunochemical techniques in which specific DNA adducts can be detected with antibodies. The level of sensitivity achieved in these experiments renders these methods applicable for human biomonitoring. When suitable antibodies are available, the immunochemical approach enables one to analyze various types of adducts separately, and to discriminate between irrelevant (e.g., quickly repairable) and relevant lesions (key lesions) with respect to biological end points such as mutation induction and cancer. Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies were used for the detection of DNA adducts in animal and human tissue. Adducts were measured in DNA from various organs of rats treated with the liver carcinogen 2-AAF. Human exposure to genotoxic agents was studied by the measurement of DNA adducts in blood cells from patients treated with the genotoxic cytostatic cisplatin. Also, the development is described of a system to detect and quantitate DNA adducts at the single-cell level by means of immunofluorescence microscopy, which allows the analysis of small samples of human tissue with preservation of cell morphology.

The organ-specific induction of DNA adducts in 2-acetylaminofluorene-treated rats, studied by means of a sensitive immunochemical method.

Exposure of cells to chemical carcinogens and mutagens may result in the formation of DNA adducts, which can give rise to mutations in the genome and to cellular transformation. Methods to measure DNA-adduct formation may be useful for 'biomonitoring', to establish exposure of laboratory animals or humans to DNA-damaging agents. For such purposes, immunochemical methods appear to be suitable, because they allow sensitive detection and quantification of DNA adducts in small amounts of sample in a non-radiolabelled form. We have worked out optimal conditions for the detection of DNA adducts by means of competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This technique involves interaction of soluble antigen, immobilized antigen and antibody. It appeared that the sensitivity of the competitive assay can be improved by lowering the amount of immobilized antigen, adsorbed to the wall of the plastic reaction vessel. On the basis of these observations, suitable conditions were selected for a sensitive quantitative assay of adducts in DNA isolated from various organs of rats, treated (p.o.) with the liver carcinogen 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF). Under the conditions of these experiments, the available rabbit antiserum recognizes the guanosine-AAF adduct with high specificity. A time- and dose-dependent induction of AAF adducts could be measured in liver DNA from exposed rats, whereas the amount of adducts in DNA from spleen and nucleated blood cells remained below the detection limit (1 adduct/10(8) nucleotides). The implications of these findings with respect to the relevance of blood cell biomonitoring for target cell exposure are discussed.