Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 32(1): 44-7, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16260112

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate expression of the steroid hormone receptors estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha and -beta, progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) in male breast cancer. METHODS: Specimens from 16 male breast cancers were immunostained for ERalpha, ERbeta, PR and AR. FINDINGS: Eighty-seven percent of tumours expressed ERalpha, 93% PR, 87% ERbeta and 87% AR. Staining for ERalpha and PR was confined exclusively to the nuclei of epithelial cells with some heterogeneity. Nuclear immunoreactivity was also observed with AR. Again this was restricted to epithelial cells but tended to be more uniform. ERbeta was seen in the nuclei of epithelial cells and also in stromal fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Analysis of serial sections revealed a similar pattern of staining with ERbeta and AR in epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to expression of the better known steroid receptors, ERalpha, PR and AR, we have demonstrated a high rate of expression of ERbeta in male breast cancer. This is in keeping with the generally high steroid receptor expression seen in males. However, the abundance of ERbeta expressed in this small series of male breast cancer is in contrast to female breast cancer where ERbeta expression is often reduced.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms, Male/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor beta/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms, Male/pathology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Neoplasm Staging
2.
J Clin Pathol ; 58(1): 69-71, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15623486

ABSTRACT

Male breast cancer is uncommon, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers. Carcinoma metastatic to the male breast is also unusual, with metastatic prostatic carcinoma being among the most common primary sites from which such tumours derive. Metastatic prostatic cancer and primary breast cancer may be histologically indistinguishable without immunohistochemistry because both often infiltrate with a cribriform architecture. Distinguishing between primary and metastatic disease within the breast is important because the treatment options for each are radically different. Following a case in which metastatic prostatic disease was initially wrongly diagnosed as primary breast cancer, a small series of male breast cancers was examined for expression of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase to assess the usefulness of these markers in making this distinction. Focal expression of PSA was found in one of 11 cases of male breast cancer. These results indicate that PSA should be used with caution in this context.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms, Male/secondary , Prostate-Specific Antigen/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged
3.
J Clin Pathol ; 57(2): 193-5, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14747449

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To establish the relation between the amount of breast core needle biopsy (CNB) material examined and agreement between preoperative and postoperative histopathology parameters in invasive breast cancer. METHODS: The CNB and surgical specimen histopathology reports of 113 patients with invasive breast carcinoma were reviewed and the total amount of CNB material examined for each case was determined. Agreement was calculated for tumour type, grade, mitoses, nuclear pleomorphism, and tubule formation. Associations between the amount of CNB material and histopathology agreement before and after surgery were explored using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Tumour type and grade agreed in 65.4% and 61.6% of cases, respectively. The components used to calculate grade--nuclear pleomorphism (57.4%), mitoses (59.4%), and tubule formation (55.6%)--agreed slightly less frequently. The proportion of cases with preoperative and postoperative assessments that agreed did not depend on the number of cores collected or the total amount of material examined. CONCLUSION: Neither tumour type and grade, nor the individual components used to calculate grade agreed consistently between the CNB and surgical specimen. The number of cores collected and the total amount of material reviewed by the pathologist does not influence the likelihood of agreement between preoperative and postoperative histopathology reports.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Mitosis , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Postoperative Care , Preoperative Care/methods , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...