Value of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) without histological proof of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion: Results of a two-year continuous retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) conization has been associated with adverse obstetrical outcomes. In an approach to reduce the number of performed LLETZ procedures, we conducted this study to evaluate whether "diagnostic" LLETZ should still be performed, by analyzing their yield in terms of detection (and treatment) of real high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). METHODS: During a two-year study period, all patients who underwent a LLETZ procedure in our institution were retrospectively included. Study participants were divided into two groups according to LLETZ indication: a biopsy-proven HSIL group, and a non-biopsy-proven HSIL group. The results of the final histological examination were recorded, as well as excision margin status and specimen dimensions. RESULTS: During the two-year study period, 396 LLETZs were performed, 283 (71%) of which were indicated by biopsy-proven HSIL. In the non-biopsy-proven group, final histology showed 50 cases of HSIL (44%) and 4 cases of carcinoma (3.6%), versus respectively, in the biopsy-proven group, 221 (78%) HSIL and 28 (9.9%) carcinoma (p<0.001). Regarding margin status and specimen dimensions, no intergroup difference was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: So called "diagnostic" LLETZ allowed the detection of severe cervical lesions in almost half of cases, without increasing specimen dimensions in comparison with classical conization indications. Moreover, they also allowed an efficient treatment as showed by similar margins status. Our results therefore strengthen the idea that "diagnostic" LLETZ, when specific indications are respected, should not be overlooked as a major part of our therapeutic arsenal.

Risk factors for unsatisfactory colposcopy after large loop excision of the transformation zone: The results of a four-year multicenter prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Not being able to completely examine the cervical squamocolummar junction (SCJ) in colposcopy after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is an important issue regarding surveillance, as high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia recurrence risk is high. This study was conducted in order to identify risk factors for post-LLETZ unsatisfactory colposcopy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study was performed in nine French University hospitals, with inclusions running from December 2013 to December 2017. All patients scheduled for LLETZ were included and were divided into two groups after the two to four months post-procedure colposcopic examination: a satisfactory and an unsatisfactory post-LLETZ colposcopy group. RESULTS: In total, 601 cases were analyzed and 71 post-LLETZ colposcopies (12%) were described as unsatisfactory (including 19 cervical stenosis). In a univariate analysis, we only observed a statistically significant increase of the following parameters in the unsatisfactory post-LLETZ group in comparison with the satisfactory post-LLETZ group: parity (2.11 [±1.55] and 1.49 [±1.24] respectively, p < .01), depth of the LLETZ specimen (10.9 mm [±3.37] and 9.76 [±3.79] respectively, p < .01), age (45.9 years [±11.7] and 37.9 [±9.42] respectively, p < .001) and an unsatisfactory pre-LLETZ colposcopy (43 satisfactory pre-LLETZ colposcopies [61%] and 456 [86%] respectively, p < .001). In a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis, only the two latter parameters were found to be independently associated with unsatisfactory post-LLETZ colposcopies. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should consider other therapeutic strategies when contemplating iterative diagnosis-LLETZ in older women with initially invisible SCJ, as an appropriate post-LLETZ surveillance is at higher risk of being impossible to achieve.

A predictive neonatal mortality score for women with premature rupture of membranes after 22-27 weeks of gestation.

OBJECTIVE: Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity. The objectives of the present study were to analyze the outcomes of pregnancies complicated by PROM between 22 and 27+6 weeks of gestation (WG) and to study antepartum risk factors that might predict neonatal death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and seven pregnancies were analyzed over a 3-year period in a tertiary maternity hospital. The collected maternal and neonatal data were used to model and predict the outcome of PROM. RESULTS: Prevalence of PROM (for live births) was 1.08%, and the overall survival rate was 59.8%. From preselected candidate variables, gestational age (GA) at PROM (p = .0002), a positive vaginal culture for pathogenic bacteria (p = .01), primiparity (p = .02), and the quantity of amniotic fluid (p = .03) were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The corresponding adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence interval] were, respectively, 0.91 [0.87-0.96], 11.08 [1.65-74.42], 0.55 [0.33-0.91], and 0.97 [0.95-0.99]. These parameters were used to build a predictive score for neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate after PROM at 22-27+6 weeks of gestation was 59.8%. Our predictive model (built using multivariable logistic regression) may be of value for obstetricians and neonatologists counseling couples after PROM.