Psychosocial risk factors for depressive symptoms after the AZF chemical factory explosion in Toulouse, France.

BACKGROUND: On 21 September 2001, a huge explosion occurred in a chemical plant in Toulouse. The hypothesis of the study was that the level of depressive symptoms after an industrial disaster would be related to the intensity of exposure and the characteristics of the exposed population, as well as to the consequences of the disaster during the following months. METHODS: A random sample of the population living close to the plant at the time of the explosion was included in a cross-sectional study, and 811 persons aged > 18 years were interviewed at home. The depressive symptoms score was analysed by gender in relation to characteristics of the population before the explosion, immediate exposure to the explosion and post-trauma factors. RESULTS: The mean depressive symptoms scores (± SD) 18 months after the explosion were 17.8 (± 1) in women and 13.5 (± 1) in men. Age > 45 years and psychiatric treatment in the previous year; high immediate exposure (proximity to the site at the time of the explosion < 2500 m); and post-trauma factors such as financial difficulties or physical sequelae during the months after the disaster were related to a higher depressive symptoms score in both men and women. CONCLUSION: In the population living near the site of an industrial explosion, individual vulnerability, exposure and post-trauma factors were associated with depressive symptoms. All three sets of factors need to be taken into account when planning a response to a disaster and reducing the psychological aftermath.

Hearing status after an industrial explosion: experience of the AZF explosion, 21 September 2001, France.

OBJECTIVES: Following the explosion of a chemical plant in France, a study was conducted to analyse the relationship between hearing thresholds and distance from the explosion based on post- and pre-blast audiometric data, and to describe the functional symptoms and visits for hearing problems. METHODS: Audiometric tests with standard procedure of 511 workers of a company located near the explosion were proposed and conducted by the occupational medicine department after the explosion. Past occupational noise exposure, past medical history of ear problems, distance from the explosion, functional symptoms and visits for hearing problems following explosion and results of past audiometric tests if available were collected. Workers were classified as "exposed" or "less exposed" according to the distance from the explosion. Mean decibel threshold shifts for each ear were analysed by frequency with Student's t test and by multiple linear regression taking into account confounding factors. RESULTS: Of a total of 425 (83%) of the firm's workers who participated in the study, 49% had received an audiometric test before the explosion. Hearing shift between pre- and post-explosion audiograms was significantly greater for the "exposed" group than for the "less exposed" one at 2,000 and 4,000 Hz (P < 0.05, P < 0.001, respectively) and borderline at 6,000 Hz (P = 0.09) for the right ear and at 2,000 (P < 0.01), 6,000 and 8,000 Hz (P < 0.05) for the left ear. Among those of the "exposed" workers who reported any functional symptom following the explosion, 45% did not visit an ENT specialist despite these signs. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated statistically significant hearing shift from 2,000 to 6,000 Hz in relation with distance from the explosion and showed that even when functional symptoms were present, people did not necessarily seek medical advice. Screening for hearing loss should be recommended for people most exposed to excess acoustic pressure, in order to offer them prevention advice.

Assessing post-disaster consequences for health at the population level: experience from the AZF factory explosion in Toulouse.

BACKGROUND: A major explosion occurred in the AZF chemical factory in Toulouse in September 2001. A comprehensive programme of epidemiological surveillance was set up. OBJECTIVES: To present an overview of the programme and discuss the methods and potential utility of post-disaster epidemiology. The programme had three objectives: (1) to analyse comprehensively the short-term and long-term effects of air, water and secondary soil pollution on health; (2) to identify health problems needing special attention; and (3) to investigate the long-term direct and indirect effects on the population's health. METHODS: The programme was organised through three committees: (1) a scientific committee, (2) an executive programme committee and (3) an institutional committee which aimed to facilitate exchanges between the epidemiologists, the regional authorities, the population and the media. As the catastrophe was an industrial disaster that had a major effect on workers and companies, and also caused severe damage to many schools and buildings all over the city, routine and ad hoc surveillance systems were used and three specific ad hoc questionnaire surveys in workers, schoolchildren and the general population were planned. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the routine surveillance systems had limitations, several sources provided useful information for public health decisions and were found to be concordant with ad hoc epidemiological studies. Defining a victim was central to the choice of a programme design based on an approach either to victims of the disaster or to the entire population in the surrounding region. Anticipation and preparation for such disasters are thus required.