Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after failed autologous transplant for lymphoma using TLI and anti-thymocyte globulin conditioning.

We describe 47 patients with lymphoma and failed prior autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) who received TLI-ATG (anti-thymocyte globulin) conditioning followed by allogeneic HCT. Thirty-two patients had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=19), T-cell NHL (n=6), mantle cell lymphoma (n=4) or other B-cell subtypes (n=3)), and 15 had Hodgkin lymphoma. The median follow-up was 4.9 (range, 2.1-11.9) years. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD at day +100 was 12%, and the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GvHD at 1 year was 36%. The 3-year cumulative incidences of overall survival (OS), PFS and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 81%, 44% and 7%, respectively. Fifteen patients died (relapse, n=10; NRM, n=5). Among the 25 patients with relapse after allogeneic HCT, 11 (44%) achieved durable (>1 year) CRs following donor lymphocyte infusion or chemoradiotherapy. The majority of surviving patients (75%; n=24) were able to discontinue all immunosuppression. For patients with relapsed lymphoma after autologous HCT, allogeneic HCT using TLI-ATG conditioning is a well-tolerated, predominantly outpatient therapy with low NRM (7% at 3 years), a low incidence of GvHD, durable disease control and excellent OS (81% at 3 years).

Alternative donors extend transplantation for patients with lymphoma who lack an HLA matched donor.

Alternative donor transplantation is increasingly used for high-risk lymphoma patients. We analyzed 1593 transplant recipients (2000-2010) and compared transplant outcomes in recipients of 8/8 allele HLA-A, -B, -C and DRB1 matched unrelated donors (MUDs; n=1176), 7/8 allele HLA mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs; n=275) and umbilical cord blood donors (1 or 2 units UCB; n=142). Adjusted 3-year non-relapse mortality of MMUD (44%) was higher as compared with MUD (35%; P=0.004), but similar to UCB recipients (37%; P=0.19), although UCB had lower rates of neutrophil and platelet recovery compared with unrelated donor groups. With a median follow-up of 55 months, 3-year adjusted cumulative incidence of relapse was lower after MMUD compared with MUD (25% vs 33%, P=0.003) but similar between UCB and MUD (30% vs 33%; P=0.48). In multivariate analysis, UCB recipients had lower risks of acute and chronic GVHD compared with adult donor groups (UCB vs MUD: hazard ratio (HR)=0.68, P=0.05; HR=0.35; P<0.001). Adjusted 3-year OS was comparable (43% MUD, 37% MMUD and 41% UCB). These data highlight the observation that patients with lymphoma have acceptable survival after alternative donor transplantation. MMUD and UCB can extend the curative potential of allotransplant to patients who lack suitable HLA matched sibling or MUD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome.

We describe outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome (MF/SS). Outcomes of 129 subjects with MF/SS reported to the Center for the International Blood and Marrow Transplant from 2000-2009. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 30 (4-206) months and most subjects were with multiply relapsed/ refractory disease. The majority (64%) received non-myeloablative conditioning (NST) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). NST/RIC recipients were older in age compared with myeloablative recipients (median age 51 vs 44 years, P=0.005) and transplanted in recent years. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 and 5 years was 19% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12-27%) and 22% (95% CI 15-31%), respectively. Risk of disease progression was 50% (95% CI 41-60%) at 1 year and 61% (95% CI 50-71%) at 5 years. PFS at 1 and 5 years was 31% (95% CI 22-40%) and 17% (95% CI 9-26%), respectively. OS at 1 and 5 years was 54% (95% CI 45-63%) and 32% (95% CI 22-44%), respectively. Allogeneic HCT in MF/SS results in 5-year survival in approximately one-third of patients and of those, half remain disease-free.

Palifermin for the reduction of acute GVHD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of palifermin to reduce the incidence of severe (grade 3-4) acute GVHD after myeloablation and allo-SCT. Adults who received allo-SCT for hematologic malignancies received placebo or palifermin 60 µg/kg daily on three consecutive days before conditioning and a single dose of 180 µg/kg after conditioning, but often 1 or 2 days before allo-SCT. Subjects received MTX (plus CYA or tacrolimus) on days 1, 3, 6 and 11. Acute GVHD was evaluated once weekly and oral mucositis was evaluated daily. Subjects were randomly assigned to placebo (n=78) or palifermin (n=77). Conditioning included TBI in approximately half of the subjects (48% placebo, 51% palifermin). The primary efficacy end point, subject incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD, was similar between treatment groups (17% placebo, 16% palifermin). Grade 3-4 oral mucositis (73% placebo, 81% palifermin) and other secondary efficacy end points were similar between treatment groups. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were skin/s.c. events such as rash, pruritus, and erythema. This exploratory study of acute GVHD after myeloablation and allo-SCT did not provide evidence of a treatment effect with this dosing regimen of palifermin.

Tandem chemo-mobilization followed by high-dose melphalan and carmustine with single autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Single autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) with high-dose melphalan prolongs survival in patients with multiple myeloma but is not curative. We conducted a study of intensive single AHCT using tandem chemo-mobilization with CY and etoposide followed by high-dose conditioning with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) plus carmustine 15 mg/kg. One hundred and eighteen patients in first consolidation (CON1) and 58 patients in relapse (REL) were transplanted using this intensified approach. Disease response improved from 32% very good PR (VGPR)+CR pre-mobilization to 76% VGPR+CR post transplant in CON1. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the median EFS was 2.8 years, and the median OS was 5.1 years in CON1. OS from time of transplant was significantly shorter for REL (3.4 years) compared with CON1 (5.1 years; P=0.02). However, OS from time of diagnosis was similar in REL (6.1 years) and CON1 (6.0 years; P=0.80). The 100-day non-relapse mortality in the CON1 and REL groups was 0% and 7%, respectively. In summary, intensified single AHCT with tandem chemo-mobilization and augmented high-dose therapy is feasible in multiple myeloma and leads to high-quality response rates.

Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as GVHD prophylaxis in myeloablative, matched-related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We investigated sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis in patients with advanced hematological malignancies receiving myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-identical sibling donors. On the basis of pre-study stopping rules, the trial was closed to accrual after enrollment of 11 adult patients. In all, 7 of the 11 patients received BU-containing preparative regimens. Sirolimus was discontinued in three patients because of the toxicity-related events of severe sinusoidal obstructive syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, altered mental status and in one patient because of the risk of poor wound healing. In all, 6 of the 11 patients developed grade II-IV acute GVHD (AGVHD) a median of 15.5 days post HCT. Two of three patients with grade IV AGVHD had sirolimus discontinued by 9 days post HCT. All patients responded to AGVHD therapy without GVHD-related deaths. There were two non-relapse- and two relapse-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 38 months (2-47 months), 7 of 11 patients were alive without disease. MMF and sirolimus GVHD prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of AGVHD, however, there were no GVHD-related deaths. The severe toxicities in the patients receiving the BU-containing preparative regimens limited the continued use of sirolimus and MMF for the prevention of AGVHD.

Long-term outcomes in patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies following matched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning of BU, etoposide and CY.

Patients with high-risk or advanced myeloid malignancies have limited effective treatment options. These include high-dose therapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We report a single-institution, long-term follow-up of 96 patients, median age 50 (range, 20-60) years, who received HLA-matched related HCT between 1992 and 2007. All patients were treated with a uniform preparatory regimen intended to enhance the widely used regimen of BU and CY that included: BU 16.0 mg/kg (days -8 to -5), etoposide 60 mg/kg (day -4), CY 60 mg/kg (day -2) with GVHD prophylaxis of CsA or FK506 and prednisone. Disease status at transplantation was high-risk AML (n=41), CML in second chronic phase or blast crisis (n=8), myelofibrosis and myeloproliferative disorders (n=8), and myelodysplasia (n=39). Thirty-six percent (n=35) of patients received BM whereas 64% (n=61) received G-CSF-mobilized PBPC. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years (range, 1.6-14.6 years) actuarial 5-year OS was 32% (95% CI 22-42) and 5-year EFS was 31% (95% CI 21-41). Relapse rate was 24% (95% CI 15-33) at 2 and 5 years. Nonrelapse mortality was 29% (95% CI 20-38) at day 100 and 38% (95% CI 29-47) at 1 year. Cumulative incidence of acute (grade II-IV) and extensive chronic GVHD was 27% (95% CI 18-36) and 29% (95% CI 18-40), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS (31 vs 32%, P=0.89) or relapse rates (17 vs 28%, P=0.22) for recipients of BM vs PBPC, respectively. These results confirm that patients with high-risk or advanced myeloid malignancies can achieve long-term survival following myeloablative allogeneic HCT with aggressive conditioning.

Long-term follow-up of patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving purged autografts after induction failure.

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who do not achieve a complete response to front-line combination chemotherapy are often offered high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). However, the efficacy of this therapy in this patient population has been addressed in only a few published reports. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with a diagnosis of de novo DLBCL who underwent AHCT at our center between 1988 and 2002, and identified 43 consecutive patients who had not achieved a CR before AHCT, although most showed at least a partial response (PR) to either induction or subsequent salvage chemotherapy. A total of 15 patients received a conditioning regimen that included high-dose chemotherapy with fractionated TBI (FTBI), whereas 28 patients received high-dose chemotherapy only. All autografts were treated ex vivo with MoAbs and complement in an effort to remove any residual malignant B cells. A total of 33 (77%) patients achieved a CR after AHCT. With a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the 5-year OS was 69% and EFS was 59%. Four patients died from non-relapse mortality. By univariate analyses, the following characteristics did not significantly impact OS: disease stage at diagnosis, age-adjusted IPI (International Prognostic Index) score, age > or =40 years, earlier radiotherapy and the use of FTBI in the conditioning regimen. These results confirm the long-term efficacy of AHCT for patients with DLBCL after induction failure.

Allogeneic cell therapy for patients who relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic donor leukocytes can be used after nonmyeloablative conditioning to exploit their graft-versus-tumor (GVT) activity in the setting of reduced conditioning-regimen toxicity. This approach may be particularly useful for patients who relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, GVT activity, toxicity, and ability to establish mixed chimerism may differ in patients who were heavily pretreated prior to SCT compared with patients treated earlier in the course of their disease. We have performed a series of studies of nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation and present data on the subset of 14 patients treated for relapse after autologous SCT: 4 patients received no conditioning and unstimulated donor leukocyte infusions (DLI), 10 patients received conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by unstimulated or granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), 4 patients received no graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and 10 patients received cyclosporine GVHD prophylaxis. All but 1 patient had sustained donor chimerism at least 30 days after allogeneic cell therapy (ACT), and 8 patients had more than 80% donor chimerism after ACT. Acute GVHD developed in 11 patients (grade III-IV, n = 6). Aplasia was more frequent in the patients receiving unstimulated PBSCs, despite the development of mixed chimerism. There were 6 complete responses and 4 partial responses; response was independent of conditioning and growth-factor stimulation of the donor graft. Five patients died of treatment-related causes and 4 patients died from progressive disease. Four patients remained alive 27 to 194 weeks (median, 66 weeks) after ACT. Prior autologous SCT may define a subset of patients at particularly high risk for GVHD and other toxicity after ACT. However, these data show that ACT with either DLI or G-CSF-stimulated blood cells results in direct GVT activity in some patients with Hodgkin's disease, myeloma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, even after relapse from autologous SCT. Most patients developed donor chimerism with minimal conditioning. Alternative prophylactic regimens that control GVHD while maintaining GVT are needed to improve outcomes in these heavily pretreated patients.

A phase II trial of docetaxel for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for patients with breast cancer and ovarian cancer.

As docetaxel is known to have significant antineoplastic activity against breast and ovarian cancer, we explored its application as a peripheral blood stem cell mobilizing agent in 33 women with stage lll-IV ovarian carcinoma (n = 10) or stage ll-lV breast cancer (n = 23) who were in preparation for high-dose chemotherapy. Eleven patients had bone and/or bone marrow involvement with their disease. The median number of prior regimens received before mobilization was two (range 1-3). The three dose levels administered were 100 mg/m(2), 110 mg/m(2) and 120 mg/m(2). Patients received one dose of docetaxel in the outpatient setting followed by G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) starting 4 days after docetaxel administration. Leukapheresis commenced when WBC >1.0 x 10(9)/l or when the WBC began to rise after reaching a nadir. Ninety-seven percent of patients began leukapheresis within 7-9 days after receiving docetaxel (range 7-10 days). The collection goal was >/=2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Twenty-seven (82%) patients reached this goal in a median of 2 leukapheresis days (range 1-3). No grade 2-4 nonhematologic toxicities were noted. Thirteen patients (55%) showed a WBC nadir >1.0 x 10(9)/l. None of the patients experienced neutropenic fever or required blood or platelet transfusion support. In conclusion, docetaxel + G-CSF is an effective, well-tolerated regimen for PBPC mobilization which can be safely administered in the outpatient setting with minimal toxicity.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor concentration as a biochemical indicator for acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

When interleukin-2 (IL-2) binds to the IL-2 receptor (IL2-R) on activated T cells, a soluble portion of the receptor (sIL2-R) is released. After allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), the serum concentration of sIL2-R may, therefore, be a useful surrogate marker for T cell activation that results in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). To determine if the sIL2-R concentration is a useful marker to help establish a diagnosis of aGVHD, serial sIL2-R concentrations were measured weekly for 4 weeks in 43 patients after allogeneic BMT. Grafts were from HLA-matched siblings (n = 33), 5/6 HLA-matched siblings (n = 3) or matched unrelated donors (n = 7). GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporine A (CSA)/methotrexate (MTX) (n = 25), solumedrol/CSA (n = 15), or T cell depletion (n = 3). Twenty-three patients developed aGVHD (Grade I, 7; Grade II, 12; Grade III, 4) a median of 28 days after transplant. There was a significant association between a clinical diagnosis of aGVHD and an increase in the sIL2-R concentration (p < 0.001). The mean percent increase (+/-SE) over baseline for patients with a clinical diagnosis of aGVHD was 294% (+/-57%) by week 2 (n = 12), 431% (+/-116%) by week 3 (n = 14), and 650% (+/-315%) by week 4 (n = 9) after BMT. For each 100% increase over baseline, the likelihood of having aGVHD increased by 18%. Six of 20 patients without aGVHD became critically ill and exhibited marked increases in sIL2-R concentrations, similar to patients with a clinical diagnosis of aGVHD who never became critically ill. Fourteen patients without aGVHD who did not become critically ill exhibited negligible increases of sIL2-R in 2- to 4-week period after BMT. These data suggest that serial measurements sIL2-R concentration are helpful in establishing the diagnosis of aGVHD, but are not useful in the most acutely ill patients.

A dose escalation study of total body irradiation followed by high-dose etoposide and allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of advanced hematologic malignancies.

Since approximately 30% of leukemia patients relapse after allogeneic BMT using total body irradiation (TBI)-based preparative regimens, treatment intensity may be suboptimal. The killing of leukemia cells is proportional to the radiation absorbed dose. We studied the feasibility and toxicity of escalating the doses of fractionated TBI above our previous prescription of 13.5 Gy. Sixteen evaluable patients with advanced hematologic malignancies were treated with twice daily TBI using a high-energy source (18-24 MV). The first patient cohort (n = 11) received a total dose of 14.4 Gy in nine fractions, and the second cohort (n = 5) received doses escalated to 15.3 Gy. All patients received high-dose etoposide (60 mg/kg) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation following the TBI. All patients had HLA-identical sibling donors. The median times for neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 13.5 and 12 days, respectively, and did not differ between the two cohorts. All but one patient developed treatment-related grade 3 or 4 mucositis. There were three cases of grade 4 pulmonary toxicity and three cases of grade 4 hepatic toxicity among the 14.4 Gy cohort, and one case each of grade 4 pulmonary and hepatic toxicities among the 15.3 Gy cohort. In most cases comorbid conditions contributed to these toxicities. Two patients had significant GVHD of the GI tract. Six relapses occurred, five (45%) in the 14.4 Gy cohort and one (20%) in the 15.3 Gy cohort. The 100-day treatment-related mortality rates were 9% and 20% for the 14.4 Gy and 15.3 Gy cohorts, respectively, and the median survivals were 226 and 201 days, respectively. We conclude that TBI dose escalation above the previously used 13.5 Gy dose is feasible using a high-energy source and high-dose etoposide. Acute and chronic toxicities were primarily related to GVHD, infection and relapse rather than to TBI.

Transplantation with low-density autologous PBSC prepared with BDS60 for women with Stage II, III and IV breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: DS60 is a novel buoyant density solution, whose density has been adjusted to enrich PBSC from subjects who have been mobilized with cytokines alone, or cytokines plus chemotherapy. This report describes the use of BDS60 to enrich autologous PBSC that were used for hematological reconstitution after myeloablative chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients with high-risk Stage II or III breast cancer or chemotherapy-sensitive Stage IV breast cancer were enrolled. Forty-seven completed treatment and were evaluable. After mobilization with cyclophosphamide (4.0 g/m(2) i.v. once) and filgrastim (10 microg/kg/day), the patients underwent leukapheresis and the products were enriched with BDS60 using the DACS300 Kit. Myeloablative chemotherapy, given on Day -5 through Day -2, consisted of cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/m(2)/day), thiotepa (150 mg/m(2)/day) and carboplatin (200 mg/m(2)/day). RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent a single leukapheresis procedure to achieve the target number of BDS60-enriched CD34+ cells for transplantation (> or = 2 x 10(6)/kg). Five of the other six patients had less than the target number of cells in the leukapheresis product and thus required 2-4 leukapheresis procedures. Median cell recovery was 76.8% for CD34+ cells, 39.1% for nucleated cells, and 17.7% for platelets. Erythrocyte contamination of the final product was negligible. The median time to sustained neutrophil count > 500/mm(3) was 9 days (range: 8-12) and the median time to platelet count > 20 000/mm(3), without transfusion support, was also 9 days (range: 6-15). There were no late graft failures. Infusion-related adverse events were mild and no adverse events were attributed to the use of BDS60 to enrich CD34+ cells. DISCUSSION: BDS60 is an effective, rapid method for enrichment of CD34+ cells by buoyant density centrifugation and the resulting cell product is safe and effective for engraftment after myeloablative therapy.

The role of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Many patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) can be cured today with combination chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. However, for patients with suboptimal responses to initial therapy or for patients with refractory or relapsed disease, salvage therapy alone is usually inadequate to achieve long-term survival. High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with stem cell rescue has emerged as the treatment of choice for such patients as long-term disease-free survival can be obtained in a significant number of these patients. Dose-intensive treatment has been equivocally shown effective for certain patients with Hodgkin's and NHL, whether or not chemosensitivity is shown before transplant. However, HDC has yet to consistently yield durable responses in patients with indolent NHL. Additionally, perhaps the International Prognostic Index can now help identify "high-risk" NHL patients who may benefit from investigative approaches such as frontline HDC.

High-dose chemotherapy consolidation with autologous stem cell rescue in metastatic breast cancer: a 10-year experience.

One hundred women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) underwent high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue at our institution beginning in 1986. The patients underwent induction chemotherapy from June 1986 to December 1993. Patients who showed stable or responsive disease underwent HDC with cyclophosphamide (CY) at 7.5 g/m2 and thiotepa (TPA) at 675 mg/m2 or the same doses of CY and TPA with carmustine at 450 mg/m2. The source of stem cell rescue was either BM alone, BM and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) or PBPC alone if patients had BM involvement with MBC. With a median follow-up of 62 months (range 1-109 months), median survival from reinfusion was 16 months with a 5-year survival of 19+/-4%. The median event-free survival (EFS) was 8 months with a 5-year EFS of 11+/-3%. Patients achieving a complete response to induction therapy showed a higher 5-year EFS from reinfusion of 31+/-8% in contrast to 3+/-3% (P = 0.006) for patients who achieved a partial response to induction therapy prior to HDC. Marrow involvement or source of stem cell rescue did not affect outcome. Our mature results confirm that high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue can confer a prolonged DFS in a subset of women with MBC. However, the high rate of relapse remains a universally disturbing problem in this patient population.

Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has served as a model for the cure of neoplasia by chemotherapy. Current treatment results in complete remissions in 80% to 90% of cases with long-term survival of 30% to 40%. Mature B cell and T cell ALL cases that previously had a poor prognosis are now viewed as favorable subgroups. Treatment regimens have evolved empirically into complex schemes, although few of the individual components have been rigorously tested in randomized trials. Maintenance therapy is a standard component of pediatric ALL, but its benefit has not been completely established in adults, although two trials which omitted maintenance are notable for short disease-free survival. Optimal consolidation and intensification therapy remains controversial with numerous trials suggesting benefit, but several randomized trials fail to confirm improved disease-free survival. Central nervous system prophylaxis is an integral step in treatment. Identification of subtypes of ALL with different prognosis and treatment requirements offers the potential to improve management and survival in ALL.